Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:10:20.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The development of “modern” palaeontological laboratory methods: a century of progress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2013

Matthew A. Brown*
Affiliation:
Vertebrate Paleontology Laboratory, The University of Texas at Austin, 10100 Burnet Rd, R7600, Austin, TX 78758, USA. Email: matthewbrown@utexas.edu School of Museum Studies, University of Leicester, Museum Studies Building, 19 University Road, Leicester LE1 7RF, UK

Abstract

Vertebrate fossils have been converted from natural history objects into research specimens through the act of preparation for over 200 years. All of the basic techniques applied to specimens in the 21st Century were already in use in palaeontological laboratories by the first decade of the 1900s. It behoves any worker in the field to be intimately familiar with processes for treatment of specimens, as these procedures almost always permanently alter material available for interpretation. Historic treatments also complicate attempts to re-treat or re-prepare specimens. Sometimes this results in damage to fossils and loss of information, and often in wasted resources. Most palaeontologists are unaware of the historical evolution of laboratory methods through this time; much of the documentation of this process is considered to be obscure. However, there is in fact a robust body of literature that chronicles the development of procedures for the preparation of fossils. Awareness of the past development of methods is crucial to guiding future directions in the palaeontological laboratory. Regular reporting of laboratory methods in the technical literature at a pace matching that of other analytical methods is integral to the function of palaeontology as a science.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

6. References

Appelbaum, B. 2007. Conservation Treatment Methodology. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier. 437 pp.Google Scholar
Bather, F. 1908. The Preparation and Preservation of Fossils. The Museums Journal 8, 7690.Google Scholar
Bergwall, L. 2001. Preparing for acid preparation by embedding in resin – solving the problem of silvering. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 21(Suppl. to 3), 33A.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. M. 1894. On the Application of the Sand-Blast for the Development of Trilobites. Geological Magazine (Decade IV) 1, 553–57.Google Scholar
Bewer, F. 2010. A Laboratory for Art: Harvard's Fogg Museum and the Emergence of Conservation in America, 1900–1950. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. 365 pp.Google Scholar
Brinkman, P. 2009. Dinosaurs, museums and the modernization of American fossil preparation at the turn of the 20th century. In Brown, M. A., Kane, J. F. & Parker, W. G. (eds) Methods in Fossil Preparation: Proceedings of the First Annual Fossil Preparation and Collections Symposium, 2134. Petrified Forest, Arizona.Google Scholar
Brinkman, P. 2010. The Second Jurassic Dinosaur Rush. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press. 345 pp.Google Scholar
Brown, M. 2009. Preliminary report on professional development in vertebrate fossil preparation. In Cavigelli, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th Annual Tate Conference, Fossil Preparation and Collections Symposium June 5–7, Tate Geological Museum, Casper College, Casper, 5257. Casper, Wyoming.Google Scholar
Brown, M., Kane, J. & Parker, W. (eds) 2009. Methods in Fossil Preparation: Proceedings of the First Annual Fossil Preparation and Collections Symposium. Petrified Forest, AZ. 142 pp.Google Scholar
Brown, M. A. & Kane, J. F. 2008. Evaluation and certification of fossil preparators: ideas for the future. First Annual Fossil Preparation and Collections Symposium, Abstracts of Papers 1, 8. Petrified Forest, Arizona.Google Scholar
Brühl, L. 1896. Über Verwendung von Rontgenschen X-Strahlen zu palaeontologischen-diagnostischen Zwecken. Verh. Berliner physiol. Ges., Arch. Anat. Physiol. (physiol. Theil), 547–50.Google Scholar
Buckland, F. 1866. Curiosities of Natural History. 2nd Series. London: Bentley.Google Scholar
Camp, C. & Hanna, D. 1937. Methods in Paleontology. Berkeley: University of California Press. 153 pp.Google Scholar
Case, E. 1925. The Use of Bakelite in the Preservation of Fossil Material. Science 61(1586), 543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavigelli, J. P. 2009. Micropreparation … one sand grain at a time. In Brown, M. A., Kane, J. F. & Parker, W. G. (eds) Methods In Fossil Preparation: Proceedings of the First Annual Fossil Preparation and Collections Symposium, 4152. Petrified Forest, AZ.Google Scholar
Cavin, J. 2011. Vacuum molding and casting for bubble free fossil replicas. In Olstad, T. & Aase, A. (eds) Proceedings of the fourth fossil preparation and collections symposium. Brigham Young University Geology Studies. 49(B), 1.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. 1903. Report of the State Paleontologist. New York State Museum Bulletin 69, 8511294.Google Scholar
Collins, C. 1995. Documentation in geological specimen conservation. In Collins, C. (ed.) The Care and Conservation of Palaeontological Material, 1520. London: Butterworth-Heinman. 140 pp.Google Scholar
Converse, H. Jr. 1984. Handbook of paleo-preparation techniques. Gainesville: Florida State Museum. 125 pp.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1804. Mémoire sur le Squelette Presque Entier d'un Petit Quadrupede du Genre Sarigues, Trouve dans Ie Pierre à Platre des Environs de Paris. Annales du Muséum d'histoire Naturelle 5, 277–92.Google Scholar
Damiani, R. & Hancox, P. J. 2003. New Mastodonsaurid Temnospondyls from the Cynognathus Assemblage Zone (Upper Beaufort Group; Karoo Basin) of South Africa. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23(1), 5466.Google Scholar
Efremov, I. A., & Kuzmin, F. M. 1931. Preparation of the remains of the oldest Tetrapoda in hard stones. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo instituta 1(1), 223–34.Google Scholar
Evander, R. 2009. Armature damage to a mounted specimen. www.vertpaleo.org/AM/documents/Evander_2009.pdf (accessed 1 Jan 2012).Google Scholar
Feldman, R., Chapman, R. & Hannibal, J. 1989. Paleotechniques. The Paleontological Society Special Publication 4. 358 pp.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, G. R. 1988. Documentation guidelines for the preparation and conservation of paleontological and geological specimens. Collection Forum 4(2), 38–15.Google Scholar
Hermann, A. 1908. Modern methods of excavating, preparing and mounting fossil skeletons. The American Naturalist 42(493), 4347.Google Scholar
Hermann, A. 1909. Modern laboratory methods in vertebrate paleontology. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 26, 283331.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, M. 1968. Anatomical Preparations. Berkeley: University of California Press. 100 pp.Google Scholar
Hill, F. C. 1875. Mucilage for minerals, etc. American Journal of Pharmacy 1–2. Philadelphia, PA: College of Pharmacy and Science.Google Scholar
Hill, F. 1886. On the Mounting of Fossils. The American Naturalist 20(4) 353–59.Google Scholar
Holm, G. 1890. Gotlands graptoliter. Bih. K. svenska VetenskAkad Handl. 16(4, No. 7), 34.Google Scholar
Horie, C. 2010. Materials for Conservation: Organic Consolidants, Adhesives, and Coatings. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. 489 pp.Google Scholar
Howie, F. 1984. Materials used for conserving fossil specimens since 1930: a review. Adhesives and Consolidants, Preprints of the Contributions to the Paris Congress 102, 9298.Google Scholar
Howie, F. 1986. Conserving and mounting fossils: a historical review. Curator 29(1), 524.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1880. On the Method of Zadig: Retrospective prophecy as a function of science. Popular Science Monthly 17. New York: D Appleton & Company.Google Scholar
Kummel, B. & Raup, D. (eds) 1965. Handbook of Paleontological Techniques. San Francisco and London: W. H. Freeman and Company 852 pp.Google Scholar
Leiggi, P. & May, P. (eds) 1994. Vertebrate Paleontological Techniques 1, 113–29. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lemoine, M. 1896. De I'application des rayon de Rontgen à la Paléontologie. Comptes Rendus Académie des Sciences 3, 163–67.Google Scholar
López-Polín, L. 2011. Possible interferences of some conservation treatments with subsequent studies on fossil bones: A conservator's overview. Quaternary International 18.Google Scholar
Mantell, G. 1844. The Medals of Creation or, First lessons in geology and the study of organic remains. London: H.G. Bohn. 1016 pp.Google Scholar
Mantell, G. 1854. The Medals of Creation or, First lessons in geology and the study of organic remains. 2nd Edition. London: H.G. Bohn. 930 pp.Google Scholar
Matthew, W. D. 1919. Honor to Adam Hermann. The Journal of the American Museum 1919(4–5), 491–93.Google Scholar
May, P., Reser, P. & Leiggi, P. 1994. Macrovertebrate preparation. In Leiggi, P. & May, P. (eds) Vertebrate Paleontological Techniques 1, 113–29. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McAnulty, G. 1939. The Laboratory Unit. In Evans, G.Manual of Suggested Procedures To Be Employed By the State-Wide Paleontologic-Mineralogic Survey in Texas, 7391. Austin, TX: Bureau of Economic Geology.Google Scholar
McAnulty, G. 1941. Laboratory Units of the State-Wide Paleontologic-Mineralogic Survey-Final Report. In The University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology Final Report (March 4, 1939 to September 30, 1941.), 5885. Austin, TX: For the State-Wide Paleontologic–Mineralogic Survey in Texas.Google Scholar
Moysey, L. 1908. VI. – On a Method of Splitting Ironstone Nodules by means of an Artificial Freezing Mixture. Geological Magazine (Decade V) 5(05), 220–22. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, T. 1987. Cumulative index to volumes 1 through 30. Curator 30, 4.Google Scholar
Orosz, J. 1990. Curators and Culture: The Museum Movement in America, 1740–1870. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press. 304 pp.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. 1904. On the Use of the Sandblast in Cleaning Fossils. Science New Series, 16.Google Scholar
Owen, R. 1855. On the Megatherium (Megatherium americanum, Cuvier and Blumenbach). Part II. Vertebrae of the Trunk. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 145, 359–88.Google Scholar
Padilla, C., Páramo, M., Noè, L., Gómez Pérez, M. & Luz Parra, M. 2010. Acid Preparation of Large Vertebrate Specimens. The Geological Curator 9(3), 8592.Google Scholar
Prokhorov, M. G. 1929. Instructions for excavating, preparing and mounting fossil vertebrates. Akademiia Nauk Soiuza Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik. Geologicheskii Muzei Leningrad 1929, 175.Google Scholar
Reser, P. 1981. Precision casting of small fossils: an update. Curator 24(3), 157–80.Google Scholar
Riggs, E. 1903. The Use Of Pneumatic Tools In the Preparation Of Fossils. Science 17(436), 757–59.Google Scholar
Rixon, A. 1949. The use of acetic and formic acids in the preparation of fossil vertebrates. Museums Journal 49. 116 pp.Google Scholar
Rixon, A. 1965. The use of new materials as temporary supports in the development and examination of fossils. Museums Journal 65, 5458.Google Scholar
Rixon, A. 1976. Fossil animal remains: their preparation and conservation. London: Athlone Press. 53 pp.Google Scholar
Rowe, A. W. 1896. The Preparation and Mounting of Chalk Fossils. Natural Science 9, 303–11.Google Scholar
Rutzky, I., Elvers, W., Maisey, J. & Kellner, A. 1994. Chemical preparation techniques. In Leiggi, P. & May, P. (eds) Vertebrate Paleontological Techniques 1, 155–86. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 368 pp.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C. 1895. Directions for collecting and preparing fossils. Part K of Bulletin of the United States National Museum 39, 531.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C. 1938. [Review of] Methods in Paleontology American Journal of Science, Series 5 36, 231.Google Scholar
Seitz, O. & Gothan, W. 1928. Paläontologisches Praktikum iv. Berlin: Julius Springer. 173 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidor, C. & Welman, J. 2003. A second specimen of Lemursaurus pricei (Therapsida: Bunetiamorpha) Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23(3) 631–42.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. 1903. A method for the investigation of fossils by serial sections. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B 196, 259–65.Google Scholar
Stromer, E. 1920. Paläozoologisches Praktikum. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger. 104 pp.Google Scholar
Stucker, G. 1961. Salvaging fossils by jet. Curator 4(4) 332–40.Google Scholar
Stucker, G., Galusha, M. & McKenna, M. 1965. Removing matrix from fossils by miniature sandblasting. In Kummel, B. & Raup, D. (eds) Handbook of Paleontological Techniques. San Francisco and London: W.H. Freeman and Company. 852 pp.Google Scholar
Swinton, W. E. 1933. Bakelite and the preservation of fossils. The Museums Journal XXXIII, 7680.Google Scholar
Toombs, H. 1948. The use of acetic acid in the development of vertebrate fossils. Museums Journal 48, 5455.Google Scholar
Toombs, H. & Rixon, A. 1950. The use of plastics in the “transfer method” of preparing fossils. Museums Journal 50, 105–07.Google Scholar
Toombs, H. & Rixon, A. 1959. The use of acids in the preparation of vertebrate fossils. Curator 2(4) 304–12.Google Scholar
Waters, B. & Savage, D. 1971. Making duplicates of small vertebrate fossils for teaching and for research collections. Curator 14(2), 123–32.Google Scholar
White, E. 1945. The genus Phialaspis and the “Psammosteus Limestones.” Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London 101(1–4), 207–42.Google Scholar
Whybrow, P. 1985. A History of Fossil Collecting and Preparation Techniques. Curator 28(1), 122.Google Scholar
Whybrow, P. & Andrews, P. 1978. Restoration of the Holotype of Proconsul nyanzae. Folia primatologica 30(2) 115–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wylie, C. 2009. Preparation in action: paleontological skill and the role of the fossil preparator. In Brown, M., Kane, J., Parker, W. (eds) Methods in Fossil Preparation: Proceedings of the First Annual Fossil Preparation and Collections Symposium, 312. Petrified Forest, AZ.Google Scholar