Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T15:49:12.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vaccination Data When the Outbreak Happens: A Qualitative Evaluation of Oregon’s Rapid Response Tool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2019

Andrew W. Osborn  and
Lee R. Peters
Andrew W. Osborn*
Affiliation:
Oregon Immunization Program, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon
Lee R. Peters
Affiliation:
Oregon Immunization Program, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Andrew W. Osborn, 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 370, Portland, OR, 97232 (e-mail: andrew.w.osborn@state.or.us).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Immunization data are vital to support responses to vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks. The Oregon Immunization Program developed a unique prototype instrument—the Rapid Response Tool (RRT)—that provides population data to local responders within 2 hours of a request. Data outputs include vaccination coverage by age group and zip code; percentages of students with nonmedical exemptions to vaccination requirements, by school; and current, comprehensive lists of local vaccination providers.

Methods

The RRT was demonstrated to staff at 7 Oregon counties and feedback was solicited via comments and a structured survey.

Results

The RRT received strong support. Attendees identified several uses for RRT data, including outbreak response and ongoing intervention efforts, and they pointed to areas for further development.

Conclusions

The success of the RRT demonstrations illustrates that a well-populated immunization information system can contribute to preparedness work well beyond current standards. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13:682–685)

Keywords

vaccinationpreparednessoutbreakresponse
Type
Brief Report
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 682 - 685
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Jafari, N, Shahsanai, A, Memarzade, M, et al. Prevention of communicable diseases after disaster: A review. J Res Med Sci. 2011;16(7):956-962.Google ScholarPubMed
Memento Morbi, Oregon Health Authority, December 2016. http://www.oregon.gov/oha/ph/DiseasesConditions/CommunicableDisease/DiseaseSurveillanceData/Weekly-MonthlyStatistics/Pages/index.aspx Accessed 12/18/2017Google Scholar
Duchin, J. US public health preparedness for zika and other threats remains vulnerable. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10 (2):298-299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moriarity, L, Omer, S, Seib, K, et al. Changes in immunization program managers’ perceptions of programs’ functional capabilities during and after vaccine shortages and H1N1. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(Suppl 4):42-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groom, H, Hopkins, D, Pabst, L, et al. Immunization information systems to increase vaccination rates: a community guide systematic review. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 May 1;21(3):227-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
http://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/PreventionWellness/VaccinesImmunization/GettingImmunized/Pages/school.aspx Accessed 04/19/2018Google Scholar
Robison, S. Addressing immunization registry population inflation in adolescent immunization rates. Public Health Rep. 2015;130(2),161-166 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
http://www.oregon.gov/ode/reports-and-data/students/Pages/Student-Enrollment-Reports.aspx Accessed 04/19/2018Google Scholar
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr6204.pdf Accessed 04/19/2018Google Scholar
Chamberlain, A, Seib, K, Wells, K, et al. Perspectives of immunization program managers on 2009-10 H1N1 vaccination in the United States: A national survey. Biosecur Bioterror. 2012;10(1)142-150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Osborn and Peters supplementary material

Osborn and Peters supplementary material
Download Osborn and Peters supplementary material(File)
File 50.7 KB