Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:18:33.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Disaster Radio for Communication of Vital Messages and Health-Related Information: Experiences From the Haiyan Typhoon, the Philippines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2016

Karin Hugelius*
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden Department of Anesthesia, Karlskoga Hospital, Karlskoga, Sweden
Mervyn Gifford
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Per Örtenwall
Affiliation:
Sahlgrenska Akademin, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Annsofie Adolfsson
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Karin Hugelius, School of Health and Medical Science, Örebro University, 70281 Orebro, Sweden (e-mail: karin.hugelius@oru.se).

Abstract

Objective

Crisis communication is seen as an integrated and essential part of disaster management measures. After Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda) in the Philippines 2013, radio was used to broadcast information to the affected community. The aim of this study was to describe how disaster radio was used to communicate vital messages and health-related information to the public in one affected region after Typhoon Haiyan.

Methods

Mixed-methods analysis using qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics was used to analyze 2587 logged radio log files.

Results

Radio was used to give general information and to demonstrate the capability of officials to manage the situation, to encourage, to promote recovery and foster a sense of hope, and to give practical advice and encourage self-activity. The content and focus of the messages changed over time. Encouraging messages were the most frequently broadcast messages. Health-related messages were a minor part of all information broadcast and gaps in the broadcast over time were found.

Conclusion

Disaster radio can serve as a transmitter of vital messages including health-related information and psychological support in disaster areas. The present study indicated the potential for increased use. The perception, impact, and use of disaster radio need to be further evaluated. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2016;10:591–597)

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sundnes, KN, Birnbaum, ML, eds. Health disaster management: guidelines for evaluation and research in the Utstein style. Vol 1. Conceptual framework of disasters. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002;17(suppl 2). http://www.bencana-kesehatan.net/images/regional/tt_5/referensi/health_disaster_management.pdf. Accessed February 11, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. United Nation Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR). Terminology 2007. http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology. Accessed Oct 2, 2014.Google Scholar
3. Stallings, R. Methodological Issues. In: Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR, eds. Handbook of Disaster Research. New York, NY: Springer Science; 2007:55-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. PAHO/WHO. Natural Disasters. Protecting the Public´s Health. Scientific publication no. 575. Geneva: WHO; 2000.Google Scholar
5. UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Philippines: Typhoon Haiyan Situation Report No. 20 (as of 3 December 2013). ReliefWeb website. http://reliefweb.int/report/philippines/philippines-typhoon-haiyan-situation-report-no-20-3-december-2013. Published December 3, 2013. Accessed April 5, 2013.Google Scholar
6. Bartels, S, van Royen, M. Medical complication associated with earthquakes. Lancet . 2011;379:1-10.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Rahardjo, E, Wiroatmodjo, K, Koeshartono, P. Toward a more efficient multinational work on rescue and aid for disasters: lessons learned during the Ache tsunami and Yogya earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;24:301-304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Austin, C, Bailey, N. The CDAC Network: Typhoon Haiyan Learning Review. A Review of Communicating With Communities Initiatives and Coordination in the Response to Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines. http://reliefweb.int/report/philippines/cdac-network-typhoon-haiyan-learning-review. Published November 2014. Accessed February 25, 2015.Google Scholar
9. Norris, FH, Stevens, PS, Pfefferbaum, B, et al. Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(1-2):127-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Coppola, D. Introduction to International Disaster Management. 2nd ed. Burlington, VT: Elsevier Inc; 2011:9.Google Scholar
11. Perry, R, Lindell, M. Preparedness for emergency response: guidelines for the emergency planning process. Disasters. 2003;27(4):336-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2003.00237.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Internews. Why information matters. A foundation for resilience. https://www.internews.org/sites/default/files/resources/150513-Internews_WhyInformationMatters.pdf. Published May 2015. Accessed June 25, 2015.Google Scholar
13. Rogers, M, Amlot, R, Rubin, G, et al. Mediating the social and psychological impacts of terrorist attacks: the role of risk perception and risk communication. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007;19(3):279-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540260701349373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Burger, J, Gochfeld, M, Jeitner, C, et al. Trusted information sources used during and after Superstorm Sandy: TV and radio were used more often than social media. J Toxicol Environ Health. 2013;76(20):1138-1150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2013.844087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Inter-Agency Standing Committee. IACS Guidelines on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings. http://www.who.int/mental_health/emergencies/guidelines_iasc_mental_health_psychosocial_june_2007.pdf. Published 2007. Accessed August 4, 2014.Google Scholar
16. Romo-Murphy, E, James, R, Adams, M, et al. Facilitating disaster preparedness through local radio broadcasting. Disasters. 2011;35(4):801-815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01234.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Rundblad, G, Knapton, O, Hunter, P. Communication, perceptions and behavior during a natural disaster involving a ´Do Not Drink ‘and subsequent ’Boil Water ‘notice: a postal questionnaire study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):641-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Sandelowski, M. Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-methods studies. Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(3):246-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200006)23:3<246::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-H.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis: an Introduction to its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2013.Google Scholar
20. Graneheim, UH, Lundman, B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Cretikos, M, Eastwood, K, Dalton, C, et al. Households disaster preparedness and information sources: rapid cluster survey after a storm in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Public Health. 2008;8(1):195-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Hartman, C, Roades, A, Santos, J. Starting the conversation; information, feedback and accountability trough communication with communities in post- typhoon Philippines. International Organization for Migration (IOM). http://philippineresponse.iom.int/sites/default/files/pdf/starting_the_conversation.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed February 1, 2015.Google Scholar
23. Hobfoll, S, Watson, P, Bell, C, et al. Five essential elements of immediate and mid-term mass trauma intervention: empirical evidence. Psychiatry. 2007;70(4):221-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2007.70.4.283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Sugimoto, A, Nomura, S, Tsubokura, M, et al. The relationship between media consumption and health-related anxieties after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e65331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. World Disasters Report 2013. Focus on Technology and the Future of Humanitarian Action. http://www.ifrc.org/PageFiles/134658/WDR%202013%20complete.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed February 11, 2016.Google Scholar
26. The European Network for Traumatic Stress. Riktlinjer för stöd och behandling efter allvarliga händelser. [Guidelines for support and treatment after traumatic events.] https://www.estss.org/tents/translated-documents/. 2008. Accessed March 13, 2013.Google Scholar
27. Brymer, M, Jacobs, A, Layne, C, et al. Psychological First Aid. Field Operations Guide. 2nd ed. National Child Traumatic Stress Network and National Center for PTSD. http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/sites/default/files/public/php/146/146_guide.pdf. Published July 2006. Accessed October 8, 2014.Google Scholar
28. Girratano, G, Savage, J, Barcelona-deMendoza, V, et al. Disaster research: a nursing opportunity. Nurs Inq. 2013;29:259-268.Google Scholar