Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:24:10.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conceptualization of a Health Care Coalition Framework in Georgia Based on the Existing Regional Coordinating Hospital Infrastructure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2015

Curtis Harris*
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, College of Public Health, Institute for Disaster Management, Athens, Georgia
Tawny Waltz
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, College of Public Health, Institute for Disaster Management, Athens, Georgia
James Patrick O’Neal
Affiliation:
Georgia Department of Public Health, Health Protection, Atlanta, Georgia
Kelly Nadeau
Affiliation:
Georgia Department of Public Health, Health Protection, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Atlanta, Georgia
Matthew Crumpton
Affiliation:
Georgia Department of Public Health, Health Protection, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Atlanta, Georgia
Sara Ervin
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, College of Public Health, Institute for Disaster Management, Athens, Georgia
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Curtis Harris, University of Georgia, Wright Hall, Suite 145C, 100 Foster Rd, Athens, GA 30602 (e-mail:cuharris@uga.edu).

Abstract

The watershed events of September 11, 2001; the anthrax attacks; Hurricane Katrina; and H1N1 necessitated that the United States define alternative mechanisms for disaster response. Specifically, there was a need to shift from a capacity building approach to a capabilities based approach that would place more emphasis on the health care community rather than just first responders. Georgia responded to this initiative by creating a Regional Coordinating Hospital (RCH) infrastructure that was responsible for coordinating regional responses within their individual geographic footprint. However, it was quickly realized that hospitals could not accomplish community-wide preparedness as a single entity and that siloed planning must come to an end. To reconcile this issue, Georgia responded to the 2012 US Department of Health and Human Services concept of coalitions. Georgia utilized the existing RCH boundaries to define its coalition regions and began inviting all medical and nonmedical response partners to the planning table (nursing homes, community health centers, volunteer groups, law enforcement, etc). This new collaboration effectively enhanced emergency response practices in Georgia, but also identified additional preparedness-related gaps that will require attention as our coalitions continue to grow and mature.(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2016;10:174–179)

Type
Concepts in Disaster Medicine
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hanfling, D. Role of Regional Healthcare Coalitions in Managing and Coordinating Disaster Response. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2013.Google Scholar
2. US Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. From Hospitals to Healthcare Coalitions: Transforming Health Preparedness and Response in Our Communities. http://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/hpp/Documents/hpp-healthcare-coalitions.pdf. Published 2009. Accessed October 16, 2015.Google Scholar
3. US Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. National Guidance for Healthcare System Preparedness: Healthcare Preparedness Capabilities. http://www.phe.gov/preparedness/planning/hpp/reports/documents/capabilities.pdf. Published January 2012. Accessed October 16, 2015.Google Scholar
4. National Healthcare Coalition Resource Center website. http://healthcarecoalitions.org/. Accessed May 19, 2015.Google Scholar
5. US Census Bureau. State and County QuickFacts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/13000.html. Accessed July 7, 2015.Google Scholar