Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:18:03.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building Evidence for Legal Decision Making in Real Time: Legal Triage in Public Health Emergencies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

James G. Hodge Jr ,
Timothy Lant ,
Jalayne Arias  and
Megan Jehn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Similar to the triaging of patients by health care workers, legal and public health professionals must prioritize and respond to issues of law and ethics in declared public health emergencies. As revealed by the 2009-2010 H1N1 influenza outbreak and other events, there are considerable inconsistencies among professionals regarding how to best approach these issues during a public health emergency. Our project explores these inconsistencies by attempting to assess how practitioners make legal and ethical decisions in real-time emergencies to further critical public health objectives. Using a fictitious scenario and interactive visualization environment, we observed real-time decision-making processes among knowledgeable participants. Although participants' decisions and perspectives varied, the exercise demonstrated an increase in the perception of the relevance of legal preparedness in multiple aspects of the decision-making process and some key lessons learned for consideration in future repetitions of the exercise and actual, real-time emergency events.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2011;5:S242-S251)

Keywords

Public health lawpublic health ethicsmodelinglawjurisprudencedecision makingemergenciessimulationsdecision support techniques
Type
Concepts in Disaster Medicine
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 5 , Issue S2 , September 2011 , pp. S242 - S251
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Hodge, JG, Anderson, ED.Principles and practice of legal triage during public health emergencies. NYU Ann Surv Am L. 2008;64:249–291.Google Scholar
2.Hoffman, S, Goodman, RA, Stier, DD.Law, liability, and public health emergencies. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3 (2):117–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Rosenbaum, S, Harty, MB, Sheer, J.State laws extending comprehensive legal liability protections for professional health-care volunteers during public health emergencies. Public Health Rep. 2008;123 (2):238–241.Google Scholar
4.Altered Standards of Care in Mass Casualty Events: Bioterrorism and Other Public Health Emergencies.Publ No. 05-0043. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005.Google Scholar
5.Hodge, JG, Garcia, AM, Anderson, ED, Kaufman, T.Emergency legal preparedness for hospitals and health care personnel. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3 2(Suppl)S37–S44.Google Scholar
6.Anderson, ED, Hodge, JG.Emergency legal preparedness among select U.S. local governments. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3 (S2):S1–S9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Emergency System for Advance Registration of Volunteer Health Professionals (ESAR-VHP): Legal and Regulatory Issues.Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division of Healthcare Preparedness, ESAR-VHP Program; 2008:1-187.Google Scholar
8.Declaration of a National Emergency With Respect to the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/declaration-a-national-emergency-with-respect-2009-h1n1-influenza-pandemic-0. Published October 24, 2009. Accessed March 9, 2011.Google Scholar
9.Governor Martin O’Malley Declares Public Health Emergency. http://www.governor.maryland.gov/pressreleases/090501b.asp. Published May 1, 2009. Accessed March 9, 2011.Google Scholar
10.Bensimon, CM, Upshur, REG.Evidence and effectiveness in decisionmaking for quarantine. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(Suppl 1)S44–S48.Google Scholar
11.Rychetnik, L, Hawe, P, Waters, E, Barratt, A, Frommer, M.A glossary for evidence based public health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58 (7):538–545.Google Scholar
12.Upshur, REG, Colak, E.Evidence and argumentation. Theor Med Bioeth. 2003;24:283–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Amendola, A.Recent paradigms for risk informed decision making. Saf Sci. 2001;40:17–30.Google Scholar
14.Horlick-Jones, T.Meaning and contextualisation in risk assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 1998;59:79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Davis, P, Kulick, J, Egner, MImplications of Modern Decision Science for Military Decision-Support Systems.Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2005.Google Scholar
16.Robbins, SP, Judge, TAOrganization Behavior.12th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2007:156-158.Google Scholar
17.Brehmer, B.Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1992;81 (3):211–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Edwards, W.Dynamic decision theory and probabilistic information processing. Hum Factors. 1962;4:59–73.Google Scholar
19.Rapoport, AResearch paradigms for the study of dynamic decision behavior.In: Wendt D, Viek C, eds. Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making. Dordrecht, Germany: Reidel; 1975.Google Scholar
20.Sokolowski, JA, Banks, CMPrinciples of Modeling and Simulation.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2009.Google Scholar
21.Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP). HSEEP Overview and Exercise Program Management.Vol I. Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security; 2007.Google Scholar
22.Centers for Law and the Public's Health. A Collaborative at Johns Hopkins and Georgetown Universities.The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA). http://www.publichealthlaw.net/ModelLaws/MSEHPA.php. Published 2001. Accessed March 15, 2011.Google Scholar
23.Cohen, J.A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.Google Scholar