Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-dksz7 Total loading time: 0.271 Render date: 2021-08-06T01:40:25.427Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Employees of New York City Companies Affected by the September 11, 2001 Attacks on the World Trade Center

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Abstract

Objective: Several studies have provided prevalence estimates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related to the September 11, 2001 (9/11) attacks in broadly affected populations, although without sufficiently addressing qualifying exposures required for assessing PTSD and estimating its prevalence. A premise that people throughout the New York City area were exposed to the attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC) towers and are thus at risk for developing PTSD has important implications for both prevalence estimates and service provision. This premise has not, however, been tested with respect to DSM-IV-TR criteria for PTSD. This study examined associations between geographic distance from the 9/11 attacks on the WTC and reported 9/11 trauma exposures, and the role of specific trauma exposures in the development of PTSD.

Methods: Approximately 3 years after the attacks, 379 surviving employees (102 with direct exposures, including 65 in the towers, and 277 with varied exposures) recruited from 8 affected organizations were interviewed using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule/Disaster Supplement and reassessed at 6 years. The estimated closest geographic distance from the WTC towers during the attacks and specific disaster exposures were compared with the development of 9/11–related PTSD as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fourth Edition, Text Revision.

Results: The direct exposure zone was largely concentrated within a radius of 0.1 mi and completely contained within 0.75 mi of the towers. PTSD symptom criteria at any time after the disaster were met by 35% of people directly exposed to danger, 20% of those exposed only through witnessed experiences, and 35% of those exposed only through a close associate’s direct exposure. Outside these exposure groups, few possible sources of exposure were evident among the few who were symptomatic, most of whom had preexisting psychiatric illness.

Conclusions: Exposures deserve careful consideration among widely affected populations after large terrorist attacks when conducting clinical assessments, estimating the magnitude of population PTSD burdens, and projecting needs for specific mental health interventions.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2011;5:S205-S213)

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Silver, RC, Holman, A, McIntosh, DNCoping with a national trauma: a nationwide longitudinal study of responses to the terrorist attacks of September 11.In: Neria Y, Gross R, Marshall RD et al, eds. 9/11: Mental Health in the Wake of Terrorist Attacks. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006: 45-70.Google Scholar
2.Galea, S, Ahern, J, Resnick, H.Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City. N Engl J Med. 2002;346 (13):982987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Galea, S, Resnick, H, Ahern, J.Posttraumatic stress disorder in Manhattan, New York City, after the September 11th terrorist attacks. J Urban Health. 2002;79 (3):340353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Galea, S, Vlahov, D, Resnick, H.Trends of probable post-traumatic stress disorder in New York City after the September 11 terrorist attacks. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158 (6):514524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Schuster, MA, Stein, BD, Jaycox, L.A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. N Engl J Med. 2001;345 (20):15071512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Silver, RC, Holman, EA, McIntosh, DN, Poulin, M, Gil-Rivas, V.Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. JAMA. 2002;288 (10):12351244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Schlenger, WE, Caddell, JM, Ebert, L.Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: findings from the National Study of Americans' Reactions to September 11. JAMA. 2002;288 (5):581588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Brackbill, RM, Hadler, JL, DiGrande, L.Asthma and posttraumatic stress symptoms 5 to 6 years following exposure to the World Trade Center terrorist attack. JAMA. 2009;302 (5):502516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Farfel, M, DiGrande, L, Brackbill, R.An overview of 9/11 experiences and respiratory and mental health conditions among World Trade Center Health Registry enrollees. J Urban Health. 2008;85 (6):880909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.DiGrande, L, Perrin, MA, Thorpe, LE.Posttraumatic stress symptoms, PTSD, and risk factors among lower Manhattan residents 2-3 years after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. J Trauma Stress. 2008;21 (3):264273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.DiGrande, L, Neria, Y, Brackbill, RM, Pulliam, P, Galea, S.Long-term posttraumatic stress symptoms among 3,271 civilian survivors of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173 (3):271281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.North, CS, McCutcheon, V, Spitznagel, EL, Smith, EM.Three-year follow-up of survivors of a mass shooting episode. J Urban Health. 2002;79 (3):383391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.North, CS, Nixon, SJ, Shariat, S.Psychiatric disorders among survivors of the Oklahoma City bombing. JAMA. 1999;282 (8):755762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Grace, MC, Green, BL, Lindy, JLThe Buffalo Creek disaster: a 14-year follow-up.In: Wilson JP, Raphael B, eds. International Handbook of Traumatic Stress Syndromes. New York: Plenum; 1993:441-449.Google Scholar
15. McFarlane, AC.Posttraumatic stress disorder: a model of the longitudinal course and the role of risk factors. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61(Suppl 5)1520, discussion 21-23.Google ScholarPubMed
16.North, CS, Smith, EM, Spitznagel, EL.Posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of a mass shooting. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151 (1):8288.Google ScholarPubMed
17.Breslau, N.Outcomes of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(Suppl 17)5559.Google ScholarPubMed
18.Ehlers, A, Mayou, RA, Bryant, B.Psychological predictors of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder after motor vehicle accidents. J Abnorm Psychol. 1998;107 (3):508519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Kessler, RC, Sonnega, A, Bromet, E, Hughes, M, Nelson, CB.Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52 (12):10481060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Galea, S, Ahern, J, Resnick, HPost-traumatic stress symptoms in the general population after a disaster: implications for public health.In: Neria Y, Gross R, Marshall RD et al, eds. 9/11: Mental Health in the Wake of Terrorist Attacks. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006: 19-44.Google Scholar
21.Robins, LN, Cottler, LB, Compton, WM, Bucholz, K, North, CS, Rourke , KMDiagnostic Interview Schedule for the DSM-IV.DIS-IV; 2000. St Louis, Mo: Washington University School of Medicine.Google Scholar
22.Ross, HE, Swinson, R, Doumani, S, Larkin, EJ.Diagnosing comorbidity in substance abusers: a comparison of the test-retest reliability of two interviews. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1995;21 (2):167185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Erdman, HP, Klein, MH, Greist, JH, Bass, SM, Bires, JK, Machtinger, PE.A comparison of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule and clinical diagnosis. Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144 (11):14771480.Google ScholarPubMed
24.Goethe, JW, Ahmadi, KS.Comparison of Diagnostic Interview Schedule to psychiatrist diagnoses of alcohol use disorder in psychiatric inpatients. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1991;17 (1):6169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Wittchen, HU, Semler, G, von Zerssen, D.A comparison of two diagnostic methods. Clinical ICD diagnoses vs DSM-III and Research Diagnostic Criteria using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (version 2). Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42 (7):677684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Helzer, JE, Spitznagel, EL, McEvoy, L.The predictive validity of lay Diagnostic Interview Schedule diagnoses in the general population. A comparison with physician examiners. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44 (12):10691077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.North, CS, Pfefferbaum, B, Narayanan, P.Comparison of post-disaster psychiatric disorders after terrorist bombings in Nairobi and Oklahoma City. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;186:487493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.North, CS, Ringwalt, CL, Downs, D, Derzon, J, Galvin, D.Postdisaster course of alcohol use disorders in systematically studied survivors of 10 disasters. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68 (2):173180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Canino, G, Bravo, M, Rubio-Stipec, M.The impact of disaster on mental health: prospective and retrospective analyses. Int J Ment Health. 1990;19:5169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Robins, LN, Fishbach, RL, Smith, EMImpact of disaster on previously assessed mental health.In: Shore JH, ed. Disaster Stress Studies: New Methods and Findings. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1986:22-48.Google Scholar
31.North, CS, Pfefferbaum, B, Vythilingam, M.Exposure to bioterrorism and mental health response among staff on Capitol Hill. Biosecur Bioterror. 2009;7 (4):379388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Robins, LN, Helzer, JE, Croughan, J, Ratcliff, KS.National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Its history, characteristics, and validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38 (4):381389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.4th Edition, Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.Google Scholar
34.North, CS, Pfefferbaum, B, Robins, LN, Smith, EMThe Diagnostic Interview Schedule/Disaster Supplement (DIS-IV/DS),.2001. St Louis, Mo: Washington University School of Medicine.Google Scholar
35.North, CS.Approaching disaster mental health research after the 9/11 World Trade Center terrorist attacks. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2004;27 (3):589602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.North, CS, Surís, AM, Davis, M.Toward validation of the diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. McDonald, SD, Calhoun, PS.The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD checklist: a critical review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30 (8):976987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Dolan, M, Murphy, J, Thalji, L, Pulliam, PWorld Trade Center Health Registry: sample building and denominator estimation. http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/wtc/wtc-building-denominator.pdf. Published January 2006. Accessed April 10, 2011.Google Scholar
39.North, CS, Pfefferbaum, B, Hong, BHistorical perspective and future directions in research on psychiatric consequences of terrorism and other disasters.In: Yuval N, Gross R, Marshall R, eds, et al. September 11, 2001: Treatment, Research and Public Mental Health in the Wake of a Terrorist Attack. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006:95-113.Google Scholar
40.North, CS, Hong, BA, Pfefferbaum, B.P-FLASH: Development of an empirically-based post-9/11 disaster mental health training program. Mo Med. 2008;105 (1):6266.Google ScholarPubMed
41.Dohrenwend, BP, Turner, JB, Turse, NA.The psychological risks of Vietnam for U.S. veterans: a revisit with new data and methods. Science. 2006;313 (5789):979982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Employees of New York City Companies Affected by the September 11, 2001 Attacks on the World Trade Center
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Employees of New York City Companies Affected by the September 11, 2001 Attacks on the World Trade Center
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Employees of New York City Companies Affected by the September 11, 2001 Attacks on the World Trade Center
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *