Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:49:37.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Affecting Hospital-based Nurses' Willingness to Respond to a Radiation Emergency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Tener Goodwin Veenema ,
Bonnie Walden ,
Nancy Feinstein  and
Jacqueline P. Williams
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Despite increased government and public awareness of the threat of a radiological emergency resulting from a terrorist attack or industrial accident, limited emphasis has been placed on preparing the US health care workforce for such an event. The purpose of this study was to develop and apply a rapid survey to evaluate hospital-based nurses' baseline knowledge, self-assessed clinical competence, perception of personal safety, and willingness to respond in the event of a radiological emergency.

Methods: The study was conducted in 2 phases, the first targeting nursing units likely to respond in the event of a radiological emergency and the second focusing more generally on members of the New York State Emergency Nurses Association currently employed as hospital-based nurses.

Results: Among the 668 nurses surveyed, baseline knowledge was found to be inadequate. Although baseline knowledge, clinical competence, and perception of personal safety were all positively associated with willingness to respond, perception of safety appeared to be the primary determinant. Furthermore, baseline knowledge did not appear to be strongly associated with perception of personal safety.

Conclusions: Based on these results, the investigators recommend further clinical training to enhance preparedness and a more detailed exploration of the determinants of perceived personal safety. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2008;2:224–229)

Keywords

nursingradiation emergencyradiological terrorismperceived safetywillingness to report
Type
Original Research and Critical Analysis
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 224 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.McFee, R. Radiation terrorism: the unthinkable possibility, the ignored reality. JEMS. 2005; 30: 78–92.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Barnett, DJ, Parker, CL, Blodgett, DW, et alUnderstanding radiologic and nuclear terrorism as public health threats: preparedness and response perspectives. J Nucl Med. 2006; 47: 1653–1661.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Veenema, TG, Toke, J. When standards of care change in mass-casualty events. Am J Nurs. 2007; 107: 72A–72F.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. US Department of Homeland Security Adopted Standards for Radiation and Nuclear Detection Equipment. Department of Homeland Security Web site. http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/press_release_0360.shtm. Accessed November 1, 2007.Google Scholar
5. US Department of Homeland Security Adopts Standards for Radiation and Nuclear Detection Equipment. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Web site. http://standards.ieee.org/announcements/pr_dhsadoptsNstds.html. Accessed June 7, 2005.Google Scholar
6.Langan, JC. Preparing Nurses for Disaster Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Educational 2005 .Google Scholar
7.Veenema, TG, Karam, PA. Radiation: clinical responses to radiologic incidents and emergencies. Am J Nurs. 2003; 103: 32–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Shiralkar, S, Rennie, A, Snow, M, et alDoctors' knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ. 2003; 327: 371–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Karam, PARadiological incidents and emergencies. Veenema TG. Disaster Nursing and Emergency Preparedness for Chemical, Biological, and Radiological Terrorism and Other Hazards. New York: Springer 2007 521–544.Google Scholar
10.Bushberg, JT, Kroger, LA, Hartman, MB, et alNuclear/radiological terrorism: emergency department management of radiation casualties. J Emerg Med. 2007; 32: 71–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Fong, F. Medical management of radiation accidents. In: Hogan D, Burstein J, eds. Disaster Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2002 237–257.Google Scholar
12. Interim Guidelines for Hospital Response to Mass Casualties From a Radiological Incident. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Emergency Preparedness and Response Web site. http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/pdf/masscasualtiesguidelines.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2007.Google Scholar
13.Chaffee, MW. Making the decision to report to work in a disaster: nurses may have conflicting obligations. Am J Nurs. 2006; 106: 54–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.O'Boyle, C, Robertson, C, Secor-Turner, M. Nurses' beliefs about public health emergencies: fear of abandonment. Am J Infect Control. 2006; 34: 351–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Converse, JM, Presser, S. Survey Questions: Handcrafting the Standardized Questionnaire. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 1986 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Fowler, FJ. Survey Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 1993 .Google Scholar
17. Radiologic Incidents and Emergencies. Nursing Center Web site. http://www.nursingcenter.com. Accessed May 31, 2005.Google Scholar
18. Test Your Knowledge. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training (Web) Site. http://www.orau.gov/reacts/test.asp. Accessed June 1, 2005.Google Scholar
19.Baron, R, Kenny, D. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 51: 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Bennett, J. Mediator and moderator variables in nursing research: conceptual and statistical differences. Res Nurs Health. 2000; 23: 415–420.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Fullerton, CS, Ursano, RJ, Reeves, J, et alPerceived safety in disaster workers following 9/11. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006; 194: 61–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.O'Boyle, C, Robertson, C, Secor-Turner, M. Public health emergencies: nurses' recommendations for effective actions. AAOHN J. 2006; 54: 347–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Becker, S, Middleton, S. Improving hospital preparedness for radiological terrorism: perspectives from emergency department physicians and nurses. Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2008; 2: 174–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Qureshi, K, Gershon, RR, Sherman, MF, et alHealth care workers' ability and willingness to report to duty during catastrophic disasters. J Urban Health. 2005; 82: 378–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Zimet, GD. Reliability of AIDS knowledge scales: conceptual issues. AIDS Educ Prev. 1992; 4: 338–344.Google ScholarPubMed