Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:56:05.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anatomy of Mine Rescue Teams’ Casualty Incidents: A Basis for Medical Emergency Preparedness and Injury Prevention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2019

Leilei Li Open the ORCID record for Leilei Li [Opens in a new window] ,
Deyong Guo ,
Yi Wang ,
Ke Wang  and
Runan Lian
Leilei Li*
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing, China
Deyong Guo
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing, China
Yi Wang
Affiliation:
National Administration for Work Safety Emergency Response, Beijing, China
Ke Wang
Affiliation:
The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
Runan Lian
Affiliation:
The Beijing Prevention and Treatment Hospital of Occupational Disease for Chemical Industry, Beijing, China
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Mr Leilei Li, D No.11, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100083, China (e-mail: lileilei6367@163.com).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Mine rescue teams bear a high risk of injury. To improve medical emergency preparedness and injury prevention, this work analyzed the causes and severity of mine rescue teams’ casualty incidents, the primary injuries, and the link between the causes and the occurrences of the casualty incidents.

Methods

A total of 81 cases from 1953 to 2013 were used to analyze the casualty incidents of mine rescue teams based on the frequency of accidents. A panel with 4 rescue experts was set up to ensure the accuracy of the analysis.

Results

The 81 casualty incidents occurred in 7 types of rescue work and were due to 6 causes. Organizational and personal factors were the leading cause, followed by rescue skill and equipment factors. Problems with decision-making and command have gradually become the primary inducement of casualty incidents in recent years, with an average death toll reaching up to 6 to 7 people. The main injuries causing death to team members were blast injury, burns, poisoning, suffocation, blunt trauma, and overwork injury. Some of the injured died because of medical emergency response failure.

Conclusion

The construction of emergency medical teams and the preparedness of disaster medicine need to be improved to reduce the mortality of the injured team members. Actions according to the causes of casualty incidents should be adopted for injury prevention. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13:695–699)

Keywords

casualty incidentinjury preventionmedical emergency preparednessmine rescue teamrescue
Type
Brief Report
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 695 - 699
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kilinc, FS, Monaghan, WD, Powell, JB. A review of mine rescue ensembles for underground coal mining in the United States. J Eng Fiber Fabr. 2014;9:174-185.Google ScholarPubMed
Tomaskova, H, Jirak, Z, Lvoncik, S, et al. Health status and physical fitness of mines rescue brigadesmen. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015;28:613-623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, C, Stelescu, I. Increasing the efficiency of the training programs for the mine rescue teams. Ann U Petrosani Econ. 2014;14:31-40.Google Scholar
Stewart, IB, Mcdonald, MD, Hunt, AP, et al. Physical capacity of rescue personnel in the mining industry. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008;3:1-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, L, Bailes, J, Dedhia, H, et al. Surviving a mine explosion. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(2):276 283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engström, KG, Angrén, J, Björnstig, U, et al. Mass casualty incidents in the underground mining industry: applying the Haddon Matrix on an integrative literature review. Disaster Med Public. 2017;6:1-9.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z, Liu, L, Wang, K. Causes of rescuers death in mine emergency rescue and strategies. China Coal. 2016;42:88-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lan, Z, Pan, X, Li, G, et al. Discussion on questions of mine rescue crew’s own casualties. J North China I Sci Technol. 2016;13:92-97.Google Scholar
Wang, L, Cheng, Y, Liu, H. An analysis of fatal gas accidents in Chinese coal mines. Saf Sci. 2014;62:107-113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubaniewicz, TH Jr. From Scotia to Brookwood, fatal US underground coal mine explosions ignited in intake air courses. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2009;22:52-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ni, M, Zhang, L, Zhu, S. Analysis on countermeasures for avoiding mine rescue teams’ own casualties. Coal Sci Technol Mag. 2014;3:110-112.Google Scholar
Wang, C. Analysis on mine rescue teams’ own casualties and countermeasures. Saf Coal Mines. 2011;42:158-160.Google Scholar
Administration of Mine Emergency Response, Mine Rescue Professional Committee. Analysis of mine emergency rescue cases. Beijing: China Coal Industry Publishing House; 2006.Google Scholar
Liang, Y. Analysis on the mine rescue teams’ own casualties. Saf Coal Mines. 2003;34:46-48.Google Scholar
Mine Rescue Professional Committee, Mine Rescue Substation. Compilation of mine rescue teams’ own casualties. Pingdingshan, China: Yu Internal Data Zhunyintongzi Pingwenguan No. 91-51; 1990.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material

Li et al. supplementary material
Download Li et al. supplementary material(File)
File 32.5 KB