Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-07T08:40:56.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Power of Visual Material: Persuasion, Emotion and Identification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Hélène Joffe*
Affiliation:
University College London
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper integrates literature from the social sciences and humanities concerning the persuasive impact of visual material, highlighting issues of emotion and identification. Visuals are used not only to illustrate news and feature genres but also in advertising and campaigns that attempt to persuade their target audiences to change attitudes and behaviours. These include health, safety and charity campaigns, that attempt to socially engineer change in people's beliefs, attitudes and behaviours. With the increasing presence of such visuals comes a more emotive media environment with which people are forced to engage, and, under certain circumstances, disengage.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2008

References

Barthes, R. (1977) Image—Music—Text. New York: Noonday.Google Scholar
Boholm, A. (1998) ‘Visual Images and Risk Messages: Commemorating Chernobyl’, Risk, Decision and Policy, 3(2): 125–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, V. and Biran, A. (2001) ‘Dirt, Disgust and Disease’, Biology and Medicine, 44(1): 1731.Google ScholarPubMed
Domke, D., Perlmutter, D., Rouge, B. and Spratt, M. (2002) ‘The Primes of Our Times? An Examination of the “Power” of Visual Images’, Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism, 3(2): 131–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eayrs, C.B. and Ellis, N. (1990) ‘Charity Advertising: For or Against People with a Mental Handicap?’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 29: 349–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geller, E.S. (1989) ‘Using Television to Promote Safety Belt Use’, in Rice, R. E. and Atkin, C. K. (eds), Public Communication Campaigns, pp. 201–3. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Harmondsworth, Middx: Pelican Books.Google Scholar
Graber, D.A. (1996) ‘Say It with Pictures’, The Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science, 541(1): 8596.Google Scholar
Iyer, A. and Oldmeadow, J. (2006) ‘Picture This: Emotional and Political Responses to Photographs of the Kenneth Bigley Kidnapping’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(5): 635–47.10.1002/ejsp.316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joffe, H. (1999) Risk and ‘The Other’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511489846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joffe, H. and Haarhoff, G. (2002) ‘Representations of Far-flung Illnesses: The Case of Ebola in Britain’, Social Science and Medicine, 54: 955–69.10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00068-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitzinger, J. (1995) ‘The Face of AIDS’, in Marková, I. and Farr, R. (eds), Representations of Health, Illness and Handicap, pp. 4966. Amsterdam: Harewood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, J. (1998) ‘Resisting the Message: The Extent and Limits of Media Influence’, in Miller, D., Kitzinger, J., Williams, K. and Beharrell, P. (eds), The Circuit of Mass Communication. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Kocher, K.W. (1992) Stop AIDS: The Stop AIDS-Story 1987—1992 Zurich: Swiss AIDS Foundation and the Federal Office for Public Health.Google Scholar
Kogut, T. and Ritov, I. (2005) ‘The “Identified Victim” Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a Single Individual?’, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18: 157–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, R. (1980) ‘The Stress and Coping Paradigms’, in Eisdorfer, C., Cohen, D., Klienman, A. and Maxim, P. (eds), Theoretical Bases for Psychopathology, pp. 177214. New York: Spectrum.10.1007/978-94-015-7129-6_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1961/76) La psychoanalyse. Son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1984/2001) ‘Why a Theory of Social Representations ’, in Deaux, K. and Philogene, G. (eds), Representations of the Social, pp. 835. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Nemeroff, C. and Rozin, P. (1994) ‘The Contagion Concept in Adult Thinking in the United States: Transmission of Germs and of Interpersonal Influence’, Ethos, 22(2): 158–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radley, A. (2002) ‘The Portrayals of Suffering: On Looking Away, Looking At, and the Comprehension of Illness Experience’, Body & Society, 8(3): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radley, A. and Kennedy, M. (1992) ‘Reflections upon Charitable Giving: A Comparison of Individuals from Business, “Manual” and Professional Backgrounds’, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 2: 113–29.10.1002/casp.2450020208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, L. (1976) ‘The Great Seat Belt Campaign Flop’, Journal of Communication, 26: 41–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P. and Fallon, A.E. (1987) ‘A Perspective on Disgust’, Psychological Review, 94: 2341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slovic, P. (2006) ‘Psychology, Ethics and Risk '. Conference on Ethical Aspects of Risk, Delft, Netherlands, 14 June.Google Scholar
Small, D.A., Loewenstein, G. and Slovic, P. (2005) ‘Can insight breed callousness? The impact of learning about the identifiable victim effect on sympathy’ Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. and Thompson, S. (1982) ‘Stalking the Elusive “Vividness” Effect’, Psychological Review, 89(2): 155–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974) ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science, 185(4157): 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witte, K. and Allen, M. (2000) ‘A Meta-analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns’, Health Education and Behavior, 27: 591615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zajonc, R.B. (1950) ‘Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Influences ’, American Psychologist, 35: 151–75.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R.B. (1998) ‘Emotions’, in Gilbert, D., Fiske, S. D. and Lindzey, G. (eds), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 591632. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar