Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T02:43:01.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Style, Substance, and Philosophical Methodology: A Cross-Cultural Case Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2018

JULIANNE CHUNG
JULIANNE CHUNG*
Affiliation:
University of Louisville
*
*<julianne.chung@louisville.edu>
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One challenge involved in integrating so-called ‘non-Western’ philosophies into ‘Western’ philosophical discourse concerns the fact that non-Western philosophical texts frequently differ significantly in style and approach from Western ones, especially those in contemporary analytic philosophy. But how might one bring texts that are written, for example, in a literary, non-expository style, and which do not clearly advance philosophical positions or arguments, into constructive dialogue with those that do? Also, why might one seek to do this in the first place? This paper addresses these questions by means of a case study involving the Daoist classic, the Zhuangzi.

L’un des défis posés par l’inclusion des soi-disant philosophies «non-occidentales» dans le discours de la philosophie «occidentale» a trait au fait que plusieurs textes philosophiques non-occidentaux diffèrent de façon significative, en termes de style et d’approche, des textes occidentaux, principalement ceux issus de la philosophie analytique contemporaine. Comment établir un dialogue constructif entre des textes écrits de façon littéraire, qui n’ont pas l’allure d’un exposé et qui n’avancent pas clairement des positions ou des arguments philosophiques et des textes qui, au contraire, prennent la forme d’un exposé avançant des positions ou des arguments? Pourquoi, de prime abord, voudrait-on ouvrir un tel dialogue? Cet article pose ces questions par le biais de l’étude du cas du classique taoïste, le Zhuāngzǐ.

Keywords

Chinese philosophycomparative philosophycross-cultural philosophyfictionalismliterary cognitivismphilosophical methodologyZhuangzi
Type
Special Issue: Philosophy and its Borders
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 217 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burri, Alex 2007 “Art and the View from Nowhere,” in A Sense of the World: Essays on Literature, Narrative, and Knowledge, edited by Gibson, J., Huemer, W. and Pocci, L.. London: Routledge, pp. 308–317.Google Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth L. Forthcoming “Perspectives in Imaginative Engagement with Fiction.” Philosophical Perspectives.Google Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth L. 2009 “Two Varieties of Literary Imagination: Metaphor, Fiction, and Thought Experiments.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 33 (1): 107–130.Google Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth L. 2006 “Contextualism, Metaphor, and What is Said.” Mind and Language 21 (3): 280–309.Google Scholar
Carroll, Noël 2002 “The Wheel of Virtue: Art, Literature, and Moral Knowledge.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarti, Arindam, and Weber, Ralph, eds. 2016 Comparative Philosophy without Borders. London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chinn, Meilin 2016 “Asian Aesthetics: American Society for Aesthetics Curriculum Diversification Project.” aesthetics-online.org/resource/resmgr/files/diversity/Chin_Asian_Aesthetics.pdf.Google Scholar
Chung, Julianne n.d. “Learning from the Arts: Skill, Know-How, and Imagination.”Google Scholar
Chung, Julianne Forthcoming “Is Zhuangzi a Fictionalist?” Philosophers’ Imprint.Google Scholar
Chung, Julianne 2017 “Taking Skepticism Seriously: How the Zhuang-Zi can Inform Contemporary Epistemology.” Comparative Philosophy 8 (2): 3–29.Google Scholar
Chung, Julianne 2017 “The Upside of Non-Specialist Teaching: A Reply to Cline,” APA Newsletter on Asian and Asian-American Philosophers and Philosophies 16 (2): 3–6.Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory 1995 “The Moral Psychology of Fiction.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (2): 250–259.Google Scholar
Eklund, Matti 2015 “Fictionalism.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/fictionalism.Google Scholar
Ganeri, Jonardon 2016 “Reflections on Re:emergent Philosophy.” Confluence: An Online Journal of World Philosophies 4: 164–186.Google Scholar
Garfield, Jay L. 2012 “Buddhist Howls: Jay L. Garfield Interviewed by Richard Marshall.” 3:AM Magazine. http://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/buddhist-howls.Google Scholar
Gibson, John 2008 “Cognitivism and the Arts.” Philosophy Compass 3 (4): 573–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, A.C. 2001 Chuang-Tzŭ: The Inner Chapters (UK Edition). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hansen, Chad 2014 “Zhuangzi.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/zhuangzi/.Google Scholar
Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1996 “Was Zhuangzi a Relativist?,” in Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, edited by Kjellberg, P. and Ivanhoe, P.J.. New York: SUNY Press, pp. 196–214.Google Scholar
Joyce, Richard 2005 “Moral Fictionalism,” in Fictionalism in Metaphysics, edited by Kalderon, Mark Eli. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 287–313.Google Scholar
Kjellberg, Paul 2005 “Zhuangzi,” in Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy, edited by Ivanhoe, P.J. and Van Norden, Bryan W.. Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 207–253.Google Scholar
Kjellberg, Paul 1996 “Sextus Empiricus, Zhuangzi, and Xunzi,” in Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, edited by Kjellberg, P. and Ivanhoe, P.J.. New York: SUNY Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Kjellberg, Paul, and Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1996 “Introduction,” in Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, edited by Kjellberg, P. and Ivanhoe, P.J.. New York: SUNY Press, pp. xii-xx.Google Scholar
Loy, David 1996 “Zhuangzi and Nāgārjuna on the Truth of No Truth,” in Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, edited by Kjellberg, P. and Ivanhoe, P.J.. New York: SUNY Press, pp. 50–67.Google Scholar
Maffie, James 2014 Aztec Philosophy: Understanding a World in Motion. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Maraldo, John C. 2004 “Defining Philosophy in the Making,” in Japanese Philosophy Abroad, edited by Heisig, J.. Nagoya: Nanzan Institute for Religion & Culture, pp. 220–245.Google Scholar
McLeod, Alexus 2015 Theories of Truth in Chinese Philosophy: A Comparative Approach. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mou, Bo 2009 “On Some Methodological Issues Concerning Chinese Philosophy,” in History of Chinese Philosophy, edited by Mou, B.. London: Routledge, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Mou, Bo 2007 Searle’s Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy: Constructive Engagement. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Olberding, Amy 2016 “Chinese Philosophy and Wider Philosophical Discourses: Including Chinese Philosophy in General Audience Philosophy Journals.” APA Newsletter on Asian and Asian-American Philosophers and Philosophies 15 (2): 2–9.Google Scholar
Olberding, Amy 2015 “It’s Not Them, It’s You: A Case Study Concerning the Exclusion of Non-Western Philosophy.” Comparative Philosophy 6 (2): 14–34.Google Scholar
Puett, Michael, and Loh, Christine 2016 The Path. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Raphals, Lisa 1996 “Skeptical Strategies in the Zhuangzi and the Theaetetus,” in Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, edited by Kjellberg, P. and Ivanhoe, P.J.. New York: SUNY Press, pp. 26–49.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric 1996 “Zhuangzi’s Attitude Toward Language and His Skepticism,” in Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, edited by Kjellberg, P. and Ivanhoe, P.J.. New York: SUNY Press, pp. 68–96.Google Scholar
Siderits, Mark 2015 “Comparison or Confluence Philosophy?,” in The Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy, edited by Ganeri, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 75–89.Google Scholar
Szabó, Zoltán Gendler 2011 “Critical Study of Mark Eli Kalderon (ed.): Fictionalism in Metaphysics.” Noûs 45: 375–385.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo 2008 Anna Karenina. Translated by Louise, and Maude, Aylmer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Norden, Bryan W. 2017 Taking Back Philosophy: A Multicultural Manifesto. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Van Norden, Bryan W. 2007 Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Norden, Bryan W. 1996 “Competing Interpretations of the Inner Chapters of the ‘Zhuangzi.’” Philosophy East and West 46 (2): 247–268.Google Scholar
Walton, Kenneth 1997 “Spelunking, Simulation and Slime: On Being Moved by Fiction,” in Emotion and the Arts, edited by Hjort, M. and Laver, S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 37–49.Google Scholar
Walton, Kenneth 1993 “Metaphor and Prop Oriented Make-Believe.” European Journal of Philosophy 1 (1): 39–57.Google Scholar
Watson, Burton 2003 Zhuangzi: The Basic Writings. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, David 2005 “Zhuangzi and the Obsession with Being Right.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 22 (2): 91–107.Google Scholar
Wong, David 1984 Moral Relativity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ziporyn, Brook 2009 Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar