Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-h2mp8 Total loading time: 0.339 Render date: 2021-08-03T21:44:22.962Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Child and context characteristics in trajectories of physical and relational victimization among early elementary school children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2011

Gerald F. Giesbrecht
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
Bonnie J. Leadbeater
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
Stuart W. S. Macdonald
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
Corresponding

Abstract

Transactional models suggest that peer victimization results from both individual and context differences, and understanding these differences may point to important targets for prevention and interventions that reduce victimization. Multilevel modeling was used to examine within-person (aggression and emotional dysregulation), between-person (sex and age), and between-school (participation in a victimization prevention program) factors that influence changes in physical and relational victimization over the first three years of elementary school. Children (n = 423) reported their experiences of peer victimization at entry into Grade 1 and at the end of Grade 1, Grade 2, and Grade 3. On average, trajectories of both physical and relational victimization declined. However, for individual children, teacher-rated aggression was associated with increases in physical and relational victimization, while emotional dysregulation was associated with attenuation of longitudinal declines in physical victimization and increases in relational victimization. Individual differences in sex and age at entry into Grade 1 did not significantly influence victimization trajectories over Grades 1 to 3. Children who participated in the WITS® victimization prevention program showed significant declines in physical and relational victimization. Levels of victimization among nonparticipants remained stable. Implications of child and context characteristics for preventing peer victimization in elementary school are discussed.

Type
Regular Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aber, J. L., Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Chaudry, N., & Samples, F. (1998). Resolving conflict creatively: Evaluating the developmental effect of a school-based violence prevention program in neighborhood and classroom context. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 187214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings. A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, C. L. (2004). Friendships, peer networks, and antisocial behavior. In Kupersmidt, J. B. & Dodge, K. A. (Eds.), Children's peer relations: From development to intervention (pp. 37–57). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Bellmore, A. D., Witkow, M. R., Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (2004). Beyond the individual: The impact of ethnic context and classroom behavioral norms on victim's adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 40, 11591172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117127.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulton, M. J., & Smith, P. K. (1994). Bully/victim problems in middle-school children: Stability, self-perceived competence, peer perceptions and peer acceptance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 315329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brame, B., Nagin, D. S., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001). Developmental trajectories of physical aggression from school entry to late adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 503512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bukowski, W. M., & Sippola, L. K. (2001). Groups, individuals, and victimization: A view of the peer system. In Juvonen, J. & Graham, S. (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 355377). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., Ferguson, L. L., & Gariépy, J. L. (1989). Growth and aggression: 1. Childhood and early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 25, 320330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, C. B., & Pianta, R. C. (1991). A measure of young children's problem and competent behaviors: The Early School Behavior Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 3244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 11851229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casey, R. J., & Schlosser, S. (1994). Emotional responses to peer praise in children with and without a diagnosed externalizing disorder. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 40, 6081.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (1997). Transactional ecological systems in developmental psychopathology. In Luthar, S. S., Burack, J. A., Cicchetti, D., & Weisz, J. R. (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Perspectives on adjustment, risk, and disorder (pp. 317349). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, P. M., Dennis, T. A., Smith-Simon, K. E., & Cohen, L. H. (2009). Preschoolers' emotional regulation strategy understanding: Relations with emotion socialization and child self-regulation. Social Development, 18, 324352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Côté, S., Vaillancourt, T., Barker, E., Nagin, D., & Tremblay, R. (2007). The joint development of physical and indirect aggression: Predictors of continuity and change during childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 3755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, S. M., Archer, J., & Eslea, M. (2006). “We're not friends anymore! Unless … ”; The frequency and harmfulness of indirect, relational and social aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 294307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crick, N. R, Ostrov, J., Burr, J., Cullerton-Sen, C., Jansen-Yeh, E., & Ralston, P. (2006). A longitudinal study of relational and physical aggression in preschool. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 254268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearing, K. F., Hubbard, J., Ramsden, S. R., Parker, E. H., Relyea, R., Smithmyer, C. M., et al. (2002). Children's self-reports about anger regulation: Direct and indirect links to social preference and aggression. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 48, 308336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desjardins, T., Yeung, R. S., Sukhawathanakaul, P., MacDonald, S. W. S., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2009). The underlying factor structure of the Social Experience Questionnaire among early elementary school children. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Champion, C., & Ma, Y. (2004). Emotion-related regulation: An emerging construct. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 50, 236259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Shepard, S. A., Murphy, B. C., Guthrie, I. K., Jones, S., et al. (1997). Contemporaneous and longitudinal prediction of children's social functioning from regulation and emotionality. Child Development, 68, 642664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giesbrecht, G., Müller, U., & Miller, M. (2010). Psychological distancing in the development of executive function and emotion regulation. In Sokol, B., Müller, U., Young, A., Iarocci, G., & Carpendale, J. (Eds.), Self- and social-regulation: Exploring the relations between social interaction, social cognition, and the development of executive functions (pp. 337–357). Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Bellmore, A. D., & Mize, J. (2006). Peer victimization, aggression, and their co-occurrence in middle school: Pathways to adjustment problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 363378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, J. J. and Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In Gross, J. J., (Ed.) Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hanish, L., Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., Spinrad, T., Ryan, P., & Schmidt, S. (2004). The expression and regulation of negative emotions: Risk factors for young children's peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 335353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2000). Children who get victimized at school: What is known? What can be done? Professional School Counseling, 4, 113119.Google Scholar
Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 6989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harachi, T. W., Fleming, C. B., White, H. R., Ensminger, M. E., Abbott, R. D., Catalano, R. F., et al. (2006). Aggressive behavior among girls and boys during middle childhood: Predictors and sequelae of trajectory group membership. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 270293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawley, P. H. (2002). Social dominance and prosocial and coercive strategies of resource control in preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 167176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoglund, W. L., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2004). The effects of family, school, and classroom ecologies on changes in children's social competence and emotional and behavioral problems in first grade. Developmental Psychology, 40, 533544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubbard, J., & Coie, J. D. (1994). Emotional correlates of social competence in children's peer relationships. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 40, 120.Google Scholar
Janssen, I., Craig, W. M., Boyce, W. F., & Pickett, W. (2004). Associations between overweight and obesity with bullying behaviors in school-aged children. Pediatrics, 113, 11871194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen-Campbell, L., Knack, J., Waldrip, A., & Ramirez, M. (2009). The importance of personality and effortful control processes in victimization. Bullying, rejection, and peer victimization: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 103123). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kellam, S. G., Ling, X., Merisca, R., Brown, C. H., & Ialongo, N. (1998). The effect of the level of aggression in the first grade classroom on the course and malleability of aggressive behavior into middle school. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 165185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochenderfer, B. J., & Ladd, G. W. (2001). Variations in peer victimization: Relations to children's maladjustment. In Juvonen, J. & Graham, S. (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 2548). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2003). Identification of aggressive and asocial victims and the stability of their peer victimization. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 49, 401425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2004). Peer victimization: The role of emotions in adaptive and maladaptive coping. Social Development, 13, 329349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Skinner, K. (2002). Children's coping strategies: Moderators of the effects of peer victimization? Developmental Psychology, 38, 267278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Wardrop, J. L. (2001). Chronicity and instability of children's peer victimization experiences as predictors of loneliness and social satisfaction trajectories. Child Development, 72, 134151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopp, C. B. (1989). Regulation of distress and negative emotions: A Developmental view. Developmental Psychology, 25, 343354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyratzis, A. (2001). Emotion talk in preschool same-sex friendship groups: Fluidity over time and context. Early Education and Development, 12, 359392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, G. W. (1996). Shifting ecologies during the 5 to 7 year period: Predicting children's adjustment during the transition to grade school. In Sameroff, A. J. & Haith, M. M. (Eds.), The five to seven year shift: The age of reason and responsibility (pp. 363386). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. W. (2006). Peer rejection, aggressive or withdrawn behavior, and psychological maladjustment from ages 5 to 12: An examination of four predictive models. Child Development, 77, 822846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladd, G. W., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2002). Identifying victims of peer aggression from early to middle childhood: Analysis of cross-informant data for concordance, estimation of relational adjustment, prevalence of victimization, and characteristics of identified victims. Psychological Assessment, 14, 7496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leadbeater, B., & Hoglund, W. (2009). The effects of peer victimization and physical aggression on changes in internalizing from first to third grade. Child Development, 80, 843859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leadbeater, B., Hoglund, W., & Woods, T. (2003). Changing contents? The effects of a primary prevention program on classroom levels of peer relational and physical victimization. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 397418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leadbeater, B. J. (in press). Matching the prevention of social aggression to critical developmental and contextual transitions in middle school. In Peplar, D. & Ferguson, H. B. (Eds.), Understanding aggressive behaviours. Waterloo, ON, Canada: Wilfred Laurier Press.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, B. J., Boone, E. M., Sangster, N. A., & Mathieson, L. C. (2006). Sex differences in the personal costs and benefits of relational and physical aggression in high school. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 409419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leadbeater, B. J., & Hoglund, W. L. (2006). Changing the social contexts of peer victimization. Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Review, 15, 2126.Google ScholarPubMed
Leadbeater, B. J., Kuperminc, G. P., Blatt, S. J., & Herzog, C. (1999). A multivariate model of gender differences in adolescents' internalizing and externalizing problems. Developmental Psychology, 35, 12681282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahndy Wilton, M. M., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (2000). Emotional regulation and display in classroom victims of bullying: Characteristic expressions of affect, coping styles and relevant contextual factors. Social Development, 9, 226245.Google Scholar
McArdle, J. J. (2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analyses. In Cudeck, R., Toit, S. du, & Sorbom, D. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 342380). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
Miller, A. L., Gouley, K. K., Seifer, R., Zakriski, A., Eguia, M., & Vergnani, M. (2005). Emotional knowledge skills in low-income elementary school children: Associations with social status and peer experiences. Social Development, 14, 637651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. E., Brehm, K., & Whitehouse, S. (1998). Reconceptualizing school-based prevention for antisocial behavior within a resiliency framework. School Psychology Review, 27, 362379.Google Scholar
Morris, A., Silk, J. S., Steinberg, L., Myers, S. S., & Robinson, L. A. (2007). The role of the family context in the development of emotion regulation. Social Development, 16, 361388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrow, M. T., Hubbard, J. A., McAuliffe, M. D., Rubin, R. M., & Dearing, K. F. (2006). Childhood aggression, depressive symptoms, and peer rejection: The mediational model revisited. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 240248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2004). Trajectories of physical aggression from toddlerhood to middle childhood: Predictors, correlates, and outcomes. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69(14, Serial No. 278).Google Scholar
Olweus, D. (1994). Annotation: Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 11711190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Press.Google Scholar
Ostrov, J. M., Massetti, G. M., Stauffacher, K., Godleski, S. A., Hart, K. C., Karch, K. M., et al. (2009). An intervention for relational and Physical aggression in early childhood: A preliminary study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, G. R., Littman, R. A., & Bricker, W. (1967). Assertive behavior in children: A step toward a theory of aggression. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 32, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2004). Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling (HLM Version 6.06) [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
Rosen, P., Milich, R., & Harris, M. (2009). Why's everybody always picking on me? Social cognition, emotion regulation, and chronic peer victimization in children. In Harris, M. J. (Ed.), Bullying, rejection, and peer victimization: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 79100). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Salmivalli, C., & Kaukainen, A. (2004). Female aggression revisited: Variable- and person-centered approaches to studying gender difference in different types of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 158163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, D. (2000). Subtypes of victims and aggressors in children's peer groups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 181192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1993). The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys' play groups. Child Development, 64, 17551772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. P., & Bates, J. E. (1997). The early socialization of aggressive victims of bullying. Child Development, 68, 665675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, D., Proctor, L. J., & Chien, D. H. (2001). The aggressive victim of bullying: Emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers. In Juvonen, J. & Graham, S. (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 147174). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Shields, A., & Cicchetti, D. (1997). Emotion regulation in school-age children: The development of a new criterion Q-sort scale. Developmental Psychology, 33, 906916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shields, A., & Cicchetti, D. (2001). Parental maltreatment and emotion dysregulation as risk factors for bullying and victimization in middle childhood. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 349363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, D. J., Schneider, B. H., Smith, P. K. & Ananiadou, K. (2004). The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: A synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33, 548561.Google Scholar
Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. A., Lewis, M. D., & Calkins, S. D. (2008). Reassessing emotional regulation, Child Development Perspectives, 2, 124131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, R. E., Nagin, D. S., Séguin, J. R., Zoccolillo, M., Zelazo, P. D., Boivin, M., et al. (2004). Physical aggression during early childhood: Trajectories and predictors. Pediatrics, 114, 4350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Underwood, M. K. (2003). Social aggression among girls. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Underwood, M. K., Galen, B. R., & Paquette, J. A. (2001). Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why can't we all just get al.ong? Social Development, 10, 248266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology 19, 157176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, B. H., de Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C. & Ormel, J. (2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: Testing a dual-perspective theory. Child Development, 78, 18431854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisz, S. R. & Kazdin, A. E. (2010). Evidence based psychotherapy for children and adolescence (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Xie, H., Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (2005). The development of aggressive behaviors among girls: Measurement issues, social functions, and differential trajectories. In Pepler, D. J., Madsen, K. C., Webster, C., & Levene, K. S. (Eds.), The development and treatment of girlhood aggression (pp. 105136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Yeung, R., & Leadbeater, B. (2007). Does hostile attributional bias for relational provocations mediate the short-term association between relational victimization and aggression in preadolescence? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 973983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Child and context characteristics in trajectories of physical and relational victimization among early elementary school children
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Child and context characteristics in trajectories of physical and relational victimization among early elementary school children
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Child and context characteristics in trajectories of physical and relational victimization among early elementary school children
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *