Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 June 2009
In this paper I propose to apply the situational perspective in examiningthe interdependence between cultural values and actual conditions offamily behavior in Latin America, first by singling out significant inconsistenciesand contradictions between the cultural definition of the femalerole and social actuality and second, by identifying some of the situationalcircumstances that are responsible for this divergency.
1 Hill, R. and Hansen, D. A., ‘The Identification of Conceptual Frameworks Utilized in Family Study’, Marriage and Family Living, Vol. XXII (1960), pp. 305–6.Google Scholar
2 Blake, J. and Davis, Kingsley, ‘Norms, Values and Sanctions’, in Faris, Robert (ed.), Handbook of Modern Sociology (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964), p. 464.Google Scholar
3 Ibid., pp. 461–2.
4 Rodman, H., Lower Class Families (New York: Oxford University Press, 1971), p. 100.Google Scholar
5 Merton, R. and Nisbet, Robert (eds.), Contemporary Social Problems (New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanivich, 1971), p. vii.Google Scholar
6 For example, see Hill, R. and Hansen, D. A., op. cit.Google Scholar, Bonila, E. S., ‘The Normative Patterns of the Puerto Rican Family in Various Situational Contexts’, Dissertation Abstracts, 18;Google ScholarBossard, J. and Bell, Eleanor, Family Situations (Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 1943);CrossRefGoogle ScholarBlake, J., Family Structure in Jamaica (New York: The Free Press, 1962);Google ScholarRodman, H., op. cit.Google Scholar
7 Nelson, J., ‘Marital Norms and Individualistic Values: A Study of Social Conditions Affecting Consistency’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 29, 1967, p. 476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Blake, J., op. cit.Google Scholar, Rodman, H., op. cit.Google Scholar, Goode, W., ‘Illegitimacy, Anomie and Cultural Penetration’ ASR, Vol. 26, (1961) pp. 910–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Peristiany, J., Honour ami Shame: Values of Mediterranean Society (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1965), p. 12;Google ScholarCarleton, R., ‘Labor Force Participation: A Stimulus to Fertility in Puerto Rico’, Demography, 2 (1965), pp. 233–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Adams, R., et al. (ed.), The Sowing Seed: Power and Secondary Development in Latin America (San Francisco: Chandler Publishing House, 1967), pp. 156–60.Google Scholar
11 Willems, E., ‘Structure of the Brazilian Family’, Social Forces, Vol. 31 (1953), pp. 333–43;CrossRefGoogle ScholarWagley, C., The Latin American Tradition (New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1968), p. 71.Google Scholar
12 Pineda, V. Gutierrez de, La Familia y Cultura en Colombia (Bogota: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 1964), p. 424.Google Scholar
13 Hanke, L., Contemporary Latin America: A Short History (New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand, 1968), p. 71Google Scholar and Wagley, C., op. cit., p. 222.Google Scholar
14 Berger, M., The Arab World Today (New York: Doubleday & Co., 1964), pp. 99–101;Google ScholarHamady, S., Character and Temperament of the Arabs (New York: Twayne Publications, 1960), p. 50.Google Scholar
15 Youssef, N., ‘Social Structure and the Female Labor Force: The Case of Women Workers in Muslim Middle Eastern Countries’, Demography, 8 (1971), pp. 427–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Houtart, F. and Pin, E., The Church and the Latin American Revolution (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1965), pp. 5, 12, 30;Google ScholarHorowitz, I. (ed.), Masses in Latin America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1970), pp. 266–70.Google Scholar
17 Azevedo, Thales de, ‘Family, Marriage and Divorce in Brazil’, in Adams, R., (ed.), Contemporary Cultures and Societies of Latin America (New York: Random House, 1965), p. 296.Google Scholar
18 Goode, W., The Family (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1964), p. 30.Google Scholar
19 Herring, H., A History of Latin America from the Beginnings to the Present (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1961), p. 188;Google ScholarSchurz, W., This New World: The Civilization of Latin America (New York: G. P. Dutton & Co., 1954), p. 299.Google Scholar
20 Merton, R. and Nisbet, R., op. cit., p. 476.Google Scholar
21 Andreski, S., Parasitism and Subversion: The Case of Latin America (New York: Schenken Books, 1969), p. 50.Google Scholar
22 Blake, J., op. cit., p. 89.Google Scholar
23 Willems, E., op. cit., p. 340;Google ScholarAdams, R., op. cit., p. 156.Google Scholar
24 Blake, J., ‘Parental Control, Delayed Marriage and Population Policy’, Population Reprint 238 (Univ. of California: International Population and Urban Research and Demo-graphy Department, 1967), p. 135.Google Scholar
25 Vallier, I., Catholicism, Social Control and Modernization in Latin America (New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1970), p. 34.Google Scholar
26 Pike, F., (ed.), Conflict Between Church and State in Latin America (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1964), p. 13;Google ScholarHoutart, F., and Pin, E., op. cit., pp. 34–5.Google Scholar
27 Andreski, S., op. cit., pp. 189–90.Google Scholar
28 Antonio, W. D, and Pike, F., Religion, Revolution and Reform (New York: Frederick Praeger, 1964), p. 64.Google Scholar
29 Vallier, I., ‘Religious Elites: Differentiations and Developments in Roman Catholicism’ in Lipset, S. and Solari, A. (eds.), Elites in Latin America (New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1967), p. 193.Google Scholar
30 Antonio, W. D and Pike, F., op. cit., p. 9.Google Scholar
31 Adams, R., op. cit., p. 216;Google ScholarHoutart, F. and Pin, E., op. cit., pp. 191–2.Google Scholar
32 Houtart, F. and Pin, E., op. cit., p. 193.Google Scholar
33 Significant sex differentials in participation in church activities are reported for most Latin American countries. Women, particularly members of middle and upper social groups make up the majority of observing Catholics in mass attendance and in taking of sacraments. See: Schurz, W., op. cit., p. 334;Google ScholarHoutart, F. and Pin, E., op. cit., pp. 172–4;Google ScholarAntonio, W. D and Pike, F., op. cit., pp. 62, 257.Google Scholar
34 Houtart, F. and Pin, E., op. cit., pp. 129, 220, 224;Google ScholarVallier, I., Catholicism, Social Control and Modernization in Latin America, op. cit., p. 223.Google Scholar