Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-zvgck Total loading time: 0.232 Render date: 2021-06-20T23:39:04.740Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Analysis of the Effect of Spatial Uncertainties on the Dynamic Behavior of Electrostatic Microactuators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2016

Aravind Alwan
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 405 N. Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Narayana R. Aluru
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 405 N. Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Corresponding
Get access

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of spatial roughness on the dynamical behaviour of electrostatic microactuators. We develop a comprehensive physical model that comprises a nonlinear electrostatic actuation force aswell as a squeeze-film damping term to accurately simulate the dynamical behavior of a cantilever beam actuator. Spatial roughness is modeled as a nonstationary stochastic process whose parameters can be estimated from profilometric measurements. We propagate the stochastic model through the physical system and examine the resulting uncertainty in the dynamical behavior that manifests as a variation in the quality factor of the device. We identify two distinct, yet coupled, modes of uncertainty propagation in the system, that result from the roughness causing variation in the electrostatic actuation force and the damping pressure, respectively. By artificially turning off each of these modes of propagation in sequence, we demonstrate that the variation in the damping pressure has a greater effect on the damping ratio than that arising from the electrostatic force. Comparison with similar simulations performed using a simplified mass-spring-damper model show that the coupling between these two mechanisms can be captured only when the physical model includes the primary nonlinear interactions along with a proper treatment of spatial variations. We also highlight the difference between nonstationary and stationary covariance formulations by showing that the stationary model is unable to properly capture the full range of variation as compared to its nonstationary counterpart.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

[1] De, S. K. and Aluru, N., “Full-Lagrangian schemes for dynamic analysis of electrostatic MEMS,” J. Microelectromech. Syst., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 737758, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Shi, F., Ramesh, P., and Mukherjee, S., “Dynamic analysis of micro-electro-mechanical systems,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., vol. 39, no. 24, pp. 41194139, 1996.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Nayfeh, A. H., Younis, M. I., and Abdel-Rahman, E. M., “Dynamic pull-in phenomenon in MEMS resonators,” Nonlinear Dynam., vol. 48, no. 1-2, pp. 153163, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] De, S. K. and Aluru, N., “Coupling of hierarchical fluid models with electrostatic and mechanical models for the dynamic analysis of MEMS,” J. Micromech. Microeng., vol. 16, no. 8, p. 1705, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Xiu, D. and Karniadakis, G., “Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 187, pp. 137167, May 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Agarwal, N. and Aluru, N. R., “Stochastic analysis of electrostatic MEMS subjected to parameter variations,” J. Microelectromech. Syst., vol. 18, pp. 14541468, Dec. 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Han, J. and Kwak, B., “Robust optimal design of a vibratory microgyroscope considering fabrication errors,” J. Micromech. Microeng., vol. 11, no. 6, p. 662, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Wittwer, J., Baker, M., and Howell, L., “Robust design and model validation of nonlinear compliant micromechanisms,” J. Microelectromech. Syst., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3341, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Martowicz, A. and Uhl, T., “Reliability-and performance-based robust design optimization of MEMS structures considering technological uncertainties,” Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., vol. 32, pp. 4458, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Senturia, S., Aluru, N., and White, J., “Simulating the behavior of MEMS devices: computational methods and needs,” IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 4, pp. 3043, Jan.-Mar. 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Aluru, N. and White, J., “An efficient numerical technique for electromechanical simulation of complicated microelectromechanical structures,” Sensor. Actuat. A-Phys., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 111, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Li, G. and Aluru, N., “Efficient mixed-domain analysis of electrostatic MEMS,” IEEE T. Comput. Aid. D., vol. 22, pp. 12281242, Sept. 2003.Google Scholar
[13] Pandey, A. K. and Pratap, R., “Effect of flexural modes on squeeze film damping in MEMS cantilever resonators,” J. Micromech. Microeng., vol. 17, no. 12, p. 2475, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Duwel, A., Gorman, J., Weinstein, M., Borenstein, J., and Ward, P., “Experimental study of thermoelastic damping in MEMS gyros,” Sensor. Actuat. A-Phys., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 7075, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Lepage, S., Stochastic finite element method for the modeling of thermoelastic damping in micro-resonators, PhD thesis, University of Liège, 2006.Google Scholar
[16] Patrikar, R. M., “Modeling and simulation of surface roughness,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 228, no. 1, pp. 213220, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Palasantzas, G. and De Hosson, J.T.M., “Pull-in characteristics of electromechanical switches in the presence of Casimir forces: Influence of self-affine surface roughness,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 72, no. 11, p. 115426, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Palasantzas, G. and De Hosson, J.T.M., “Surface roughness influence on the pull-in voltage of microswitches in presence of thermal and quantum vacuum fluctuations,” Surf. Sci., vol. 600, no. 7, pp. 14501455, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Broer, W., Palasantzas, G., Knoester, J., and Svetovoy, V. B., “Significance of the Casimir force and surface roughness for actuation dynamics of MEMS,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 87, no. 12, p. 125413, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Chandrasekharaiah, D. S. and Debnath, L., Continuum Mechanics, Academic Press, 1994.Google Scholar
[21] Parkus, H., Thermoelasticity, Blaisdell Publishing Company, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
[22] Jaswon, M. and Symm, G., Integral Equation Methods in Potential Theory and Elastostatics, Academic Press, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
[23] Shi, F., Ramesh, P., and Mukherjee, S., “On the application of 2D potential theory to electrostatic simulation,” Commun. Numer. Meth. En., vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 691701, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24] Alwan, A. and Aluru, N., “Analysis of hybrid electrothermomechanical microactuators with integrated electrothermal and electrostatic actuation,” J. Microelectromech. Syst., vol. 18, pp. 11261136, Oct. 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25] Burgdorfer, A., “The influence of the molecular mean free path on the performance of hydrodynamic gas lubricated bearings,” Trans. ASME, Ser. D, vol. 81, pp. 94100, 1959.Google Scholar
[26] Cressie, N. A., Statistics for Spatial Data, revised edition, vol. 928, Wiley, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
[27] Williams, C. K. and Rasmussen, C. E., Gaussian processes for machine learning, MIT Press, 2006.Google Scholar
[28] Sampson, P. D. and Guttorp, P., “Nonparametric estimation of nonstationary spatial covariance structure,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., vol. 87, no. 417, pp. 108119, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29] Alwan, A. and Aluru, N., “A nonstationary covariance function model for spatial uncertainties in electrostatically actuated microsystems,” Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 99121, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30] Patil, A., Huard, D., and Fonnesbeck, C. J., “PyMC: Bayesian stochastic modelling in Python,” J. Stat. Softw., vol. 35, no. 4, p. 1, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31] Poutous, M. K., Hosseinimakarem, Z., and Johnson, E. G., “Photoresist surface roughness characterization in additive lithography processes for fabrication of phase-only optical vortices,” J. Micro. Nanolithogr. MEMS MOEMS, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 043009–043009, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32] Perrin, O. and Meiring, W., “Identifiability for non-stationary spatial structure,” J. Appl. Probab., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 12441250, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Analysis of the Effect of Spatial Uncertainties on the Dynamic Behavior of Electrostatic Microactuators
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Analysis of the Effect of Spatial Uncertainties on the Dynamic Behavior of Electrostatic Microactuators
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Analysis of the Effect of Spatial Uncertainties on the Dynamic Behavior of Electrostatic Microactuators
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *