¹ It is true that the editions of Dubner (Paris, 1835–36), Queck (Leipzig, 1854) and Baehrens and Kohlmann (Leipzig, 1876, 1879, 1884) are usually bound together in one volume, but their pagination reveals that they were envisaged as works of more than one volume. Dubner, by the way, is usually spelt ‘Duebner’ by his successors and generally so appears in this edition too, though not on page 70. In my copy of the 1835–6 edition, however, the name appears consistently as ‘Dubner’; Sweeney, R. D. (Prolegomena to an Edition of the Scholia to Statius, p. 114Google Scholar) is wrong to doubt the authenticity of this first edition.

² pp. 77–81.

³ Readers may like to know that at 2. 265, tu is read by DδfS, at 2. 327 DN read in pectore with ω and at 7. 584 all manuscripts read frementes.

⁴ 1. 285; 8. 78, 587; 9. 286.

⁵ In some of these cases Klotz is following Queck or Kohlmann.

⁶ cf. also the notes at 2. 671–72; 3. 334; 4. 101, 716–22, etc.

⁷ Similarly unhelpful notes can be found at, for instance, 8. 307, 315 and 9. 279.