Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:34:42.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sophocles, O.T. 230–2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

N. B. Booth
N. B. Booth
Affiliation:
Polytechnic of North London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In CR N.S. 10 (1960), 7, I supported L. Purgold's emendation of to in O. T. 230, accepted by Elmsley, wrongly discarded by all editors since, and now omitted even from the apparatus criticus of R. D. Dawe's recent Teubner edition of Sophocles. May I now add that the emendation was also defended, at greater length, by M. Furness in CR 13 (1899), 195–7? The 1899 editor of CR reproduced, at the end of Furness's article, the sueeinct and trenchant Latin in which, in the year 1802, Purgold defended his emendation.

Type
Shorter Notes
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , December 1979 , pp. 485
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)