Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:17:45.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultramontanism and Dupanloup: The Compromise of 1865

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Marvin R. O'Connell
Marvin R. O'Connell
Affiliation:
Mr. O'Connell is professor of history in the University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is often asserted that the aggrandizement of the papacy during the nineteenth century reached its height with the definition of papal infallibility at the First Vatican Council in 1870. A case can be made, however, for the view that that definition, with its careful delimitations, was in fact a kind of anticlimax, that the ultramontane high tide really had been reached, and checked, five years before with the issuance of the Syllabus of Errors and the fateful intervention of Bishop Dupanloup of Orleans.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , June 1984 , pp. 200 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See Aubert, Roger, Le pontificat de Pie IX (Paris, 1952),Google Scholar and the bibliographies listed there. Hales, E. E. G., Pio Nono (New York, 1962),Google Scholar is a sympathetic study. A recent brief biography, with a helpful bibliography, is Coppa, Frank J., Pope Pius IX (Boston, 1979).Google Scholar More critical are Hasler, August B., Pius IX (1846–1878);Google ScholarPäpstiliche Unfehlbarkeit und 1. Vatikaniches Konzil (Stuttgart, 1977),Google Scholar in two volumes, and its English synopsis, How the Pope Become Infallible (Garden City, 1981).Google Scholar For a discussion of Hasler, see Martina, Gracamo in Archivum Historiae Pontificiae, 16 (1978): 341–350.Google Scholar

2. For a dramatic description of the scene, see Mozley, Thomas, Letters from Rome, 2 vols. (London, 1891), 2:445–447.Google Scholar

3. Monti, Antonio, Pio IX net Risorgimento Italiano con Documenti Inediti (Bori, 1928), p. 196.Google Scholar

4. Both Cavour and Montalembert have been credited with this celebrated phrase. In a letter of 20 July 1863, Montalembert called it “la celebre formule que M. de Cavour m'a volee.” See Aubert, Roger, “L'intervention de Montalembert au congres de Malines en 1863,” Collectonea Mechliniensia 35 (1950): 527Google Scholar

5. Quoted in Ollivier, Emile, L'Eglise et l'État an concile du Vatican, 2 vols. (Paris, [1877]),1:314.Google Scholar

6. See [Delatte], Paul, Dom Gueranger, 2 vols. (Paris, 1909), 1:359–362.Google Scholar

7. For the best elaboration of this point, see Kselman, Thomas, Miracles and Prophecies in Nineteenth-Century France (New Brunswick, N.J., 1983), pp. 132–134.Google Scholar

8. See, for example, Pucell, E. S., The Life of Cardinal Manning, 2 vols. (London, 1896), 2:203–209.Google Scholar

9. Aubert, , Pie IX, p. 289.Google Scholar

10. Coppa, , Pius IX, p. 171.Google Scholar

11. Butler, Cuthbert, The Vatican Council, 1869–1870 (London, 1930), pp. 55–60.Google Scholar

12. Aubert, , Pie IX, pp. 184–185.Google Scholar

13. Newman to Dalgairns, , 22 11 1846, in The Letters and Diaries of John Henry Newman, ed. Dessain, Stephen et al. , (London, 1961), 11:279–280.Google Scholar

14. Thibault, Pierre, Savior et pouvoir, 31 vols. (Quebec, 1961–), pp. 27–31.Google Scholar

15. See the perceptive remarks of Hughes, Philip, A Popular History of the Catholic Church (New York, 1949), pp. 216–217.Google Scholar See also Newman, to Arnold, Matthew, 3 01 1876, in Letters and Diaries, (Oxford, 1975), 28: 5.Google Scholar

16. Dictionnaire de théologie catholique, s.v. “Syllabus of Errors.”

17. For an instance in 1855 see Reardon, Bernard, Liberalism and Tradition (Cambridge, 1975), p.113.Google Scholar

18. Newman, to Oxenham, , 9 11 1865, in Letters and Diaries (London, 1972), 22:98–99.Google Scholar

19. Lagrange, François, Vie de Mgr. Dupanloup, 3 vols. (Paris, 1884) 2:455.Google Scholar

20. Hales, , Pio Nono, p. 268.Google Scholar

21. Text (Latin and French) in Les Actespontificaux (Paris, 1865), pp. 3–49.Google Scholar

22. See the perceptive remarks of Dru, Alexander, The Contribution of German Catholicism (New York, 1963), pp. 89–93.Google Scholar

23. Text in Enchiridion Symbolorium, ed. by Karl Rahner (Freiburg im Breisgau, 1952), pp. 483–490.Google Scholar English text in Documents in Church History, ed. by Colman J. Barry, III(Westminister, Md., 1965), pp. 70–74.Google Scholar

24. Baunard, Louis, Histoire du cardinal Pie, 3 vols. (Paris, 1886), 2: 229.Google Scholar

25. Blaikston, Noel, ed., The Roman Question (London, 1962), p. 303.Google Scholar

26. Himmelfarb, Gertrude, Lord Acton (Chicago, 1952), pp. 147–150.Google Scholar

27. The two best studies of the Syllabus and Dupanloup's pamphlet are by Roger Aubert. The more general one is “Le Syllabus décembre, 1864,” La Revue nouvelle 40 (1964): 369–385, 481–499.Google Scholar More detailed and containing much relevant correspondence is “Mgr. Dunpanloup et le Syllabus,” Revue d' histoire ecclésiastique 60 (1956): 79–142, 471–512, 837–915.Google Scholar

28. In the original edition this section took up pp. 85–157. See the translation by Hutchinson, William, The Convention of September and the Encyclical of 8 December (London, 1865).Google Scholar

29. Dupanloup (Hutchinson), p. 27.

30. Dupanloup (Hutchinson), p. 21.

31. The pope said this to the British agent in Rome, Odo Russell. See Blaikston, , ed., Roman Question, p. 307.Google Scholar

32. Text in Revue d'histoire ecclésiastique 60 (1956): 913.Google Scholar

33. Aubert, , “Le Syllabus,” p. 495.Google Scholar

34. Dupanloup was among the bishops who absented themselves from the final vote on infallibility. See Butler, , Vatican Council, pp. 407–410.Google Scholar

35. Quoted in Ward, Wilfrid, The Life of John Henry Newman, 2 vols. (London, 1912), 2:101.Google Scholar

36. The text of the congratulatory letter is in Revue d'histoire ecclésiastique, (1956) 60:915.Google Scholar