Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:02:24.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Percy-“Fisher” Controversies and the Ecclesiastical Politics of Jacobean Anti-Catholicism, 1622–1625

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Timothy H. Wadkins
Timothy H. Wadkins
Affiliation:
Mr. Wadkins is a Ph.D. candidate in the Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, California, and lecturer in the religious studies program inSan Jose State University, San Jose, California. This essay was awarded the 1987 Sidney E. Mead Prize.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Theologically and ecclesiologically James I of England was a “Gentleman of Wide Swallow.” Although he did not possess the type of skepticism that later emerged in post-Restoration latitudinarianism, he did endorse as orthodox only those essential doctrines which Christians had agreed upon in the early centuries of the church, which were grounded in the “expresse word of God” and given their most basic formulation in the creeds. The king viewed himself as an irenic monarch, one who could bring peace to Christendom by promoting an accommodation to these essentials and compromise between conflicting parties. This was an ecumenical approach to religion for his day, and he believed he could help disagreeing Christians “meet in the middest which is the center and perfection of all things.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 153 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. I, James, “A Speach, As It was delivered in the Upper House of Parliament, To the Lords Spirituall and Temporall, and to the Knights, Citizens and Burgesses There Assembled,” in The Political Works of James I, ed. Mcllwain, Charles H. (New York, 1965), pp. 275, 276.Google Scholar

2. LaRocca, John, “‘Who Can't Pray With Me Can't Love Me’: Toleration and Early Jacobean Recusant Policy,” Journal of British Studies 23 (1984): 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Great Britain, Public Record Office, Calender of State Papers, Venetian of the Reign of James I, 1603–7, p. 22.Google Scholar

4. LaRocca, “Toleration and Early Jacobean Recusant Policy,” passim.

5. Dures, Alan, English Catholicism 1558–1642 (London, 1983), pp. 47–49.Google Scholar

6. This is the general argument of Fincham, Kenneth and Lake, Peter in “The Ecclesiastical Policy of King James I,” Journal of British Studies 24 (1985): 169–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar I have drawn extensively upon their insights for background to this essay.

7. See Rome, , Archives, Jesuit, Papers of the English Jesuits, Anglia 32Google Scholar (I) c. 99 (notes, courtesy of Rev. Francis Edwards, S.J., Archives of the English Province of the Society of Jesus, London) (hereafter cited as Rome Anglia). On Villiers, see Lockyer, Roger, Buckingham: The Life and Political Career of George Villiers, First Duke of Buckingham, 1592–1628 (London, 1981).Google Scholar

8. Laud, William, The Works of the Most Reverend Father in God, William Laud, D.D., Sometime Lord Archbishop of Canterbury, ed. Scott, William, 7 vols. (Oxford, 1849), 2:ix.Google Scholar In 1621 Buckingham also requested Richard Corbett, the future bishop of Oxford, to deal in writing with questions about the true church, reinforcing Laud's claim that Buckingham was flirting with changing religions. Corbett's reponse is in Rawlinson Manuscript D. 853.23, Bodleian Library, Oxford University, 172–174, (hereafter cited as RMD).

9. For details on Percy, in order of importance, see Sister Hanlon, Joseph Damien C.S.J., “The Effects of the Counter-Reformation Upon English Catholics, 1603–1630” (Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, 1959)Google Scholar, chapter 5; Foley, Henry, ed., Records of the English Province of the Society of Jesus; Historie facts Illustrative of the Labours and Sufferings of its Members in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, 7 vols. in 8 (London, 1875–1883), 1:521–541;Google ScholarGillow, Joseph, ed., A Literary and Biographical Dictionary of English Catholics: from the Breach with Rome in 1534, to the Present Time, 5 vols. (London, 1885)Google Scholar. Also noticed in The Dictionary of National Biography, ed. SirStephen, Leslie and SirLee, Sidney, 22 Vols. (Oxford, 1921–1964)Google Scholar (hereafter cited as DNB).

10. Hanlon, , “Effects of the Counter-Reformation,” pp. 191–214Google Scholar passim.

11. Percy, John, Treatise of Faith, 2d ed. (1614)Google Scholar, in English Recusant Literature 1558–1640, ed. D. M. Rogers, vol. 20 (London, 1976). For a list of Percy's publications set in the context of Protestant responses and Jesuit defenses, see Milward, Peter S.J., ed., The Religious Controversies of the Jacobean Age (London, 1978), pp. 143–147, 216–227.Google Scholar

12. Gee, John, The Foot out of the Snare (1624) STC 11701, p. 24Google Scholar (unless otherwise noted, STC will refer to the Pollard collection).

13. on Vaux and Digbys, see Anstruther, G., Vaux of Harrowden (Newport, 1953)Google Scholar.

14. See Percy, John, “The Occasion of A Certaine Conference” in True Relations of Sundry Conferences (1626), reprinted in English Recusant Literature 1558–1640, 393 vols. (Menston, Yorkshire, 1970), 312:1–12Google Scholar (hereafter cited as ERL).

15. See Stapleton, Thomas's Fortress of the Faith (1565)Google Scholar in ERL, vol. 163. On the tracts, see RMD 853. 20–24. This is an unfinished “heads of directions” to papist priests from a Jesuit superior, regarding methods of instructing English Catholics and reconciling heretics. It specifically mentions Percy's debate with Featley as the Catholic model for controversy with Protestants.

16. Percy, , True Relations, p. 1.Google Scholar

17. Wilson, David H., King James VI and I (London, 1956), p. 427.Google Scholar

18. White's earlier work was The Orthodox Faith and Way to the True Church (London, 1617)Google Scholar STC 25380. This was a defense of his brother John White's (1570–1615) two works against Percy, : Way to the True Church (London, 1608)Google Scholar STC 25395 (5 editions appearing in 1608, 1610, 1612, 1616, and 1624); and Defense of the Way to the True Church (London, 1614)Google Scholar STC 25390. See also DNB, s.v., White, Francis.

19. White, , Replie to Jesuit Fisher's Answere To certain questions propounded by his most gratious matie. King James (London, 1624) STC 25382, p. 22.Google Scholar

20. Percy, “To the Reader” in True Relations (no pagination).

21. Manuscript. 1372, ff.58v-61v, Lambeth Palace Library, London. See Wadkins, Timothy, “King James I Meets John Percy S.J.-May 25, 1622: An Unpublished Manuscript from the Religious Controversies Surrounding the Countess of Buckingham's Conversion to Roman Catholicism,” forthcoming in Recusant History (10, 1988)Google Scholar.

22. Britain, Great, Public Record Office, Calendar of State Papers Domestic of the Reign of James I, 131.24,Google ScholarChamberlain, to Carleton, , 8 07 1622Google Scholar (hereafter cited as CSPD); Gee, John, New Shreds of the Old Snare (London, 1624) STC 11706, p. 39;Google Scholar Rome Anglia 32 (I), c. 94, 95.M.335–38; London, Jesuit Archives, Stonyhurst Anglia vii.65 (also translated in Foley, , Records 1:532, 534)Google Scholar; London, Archives of the Archbishop of Westminster, Douai Manuscript 16:130.Google Scholar 164.

23. “Report of John Chamberlain,” in Thomas Birch, Court and Times of James I, 2 vols. (London, 1849), 2:316.Google Scholar

24. Tyacke, Nicholas, “Puritanism, Arminianism and Counter-Revolution,” in The Origins of the English Civil War, ed. Russell, Conrad (London, 1973), p. 121.Google Scholar

25. For background, see Baukham, Richard, Tudor Apocalypse: Sixteenth Century Apocalypticism. Millenarianism and the English Reformation: From John Bale to John Foxe and Thomas Brightman (Oxford, 1978);Google Scholar and Christianson, Paul, Reformers and Babylon (London, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26. For Abbot, see Welsby, Paul A., George Abbot: The Unwanted Archbishop, 1562–1633 (London, 1962)Google Scholar. On the hegemony, see Lake, Peter, “Calvinism and the English Church, 1570–1655,” Past and Present 114 (1987): 32–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27. James I, “A Premonition To All Most Mightie Monarches, Kings, Free Princes, and States of Christendome,” in Mcllwain, , Political Works, pp. 129–150.Google Scholar For the common belief that James held that the pope was the Antichrist, see, for example, Walker, George, The Summe of a Disputation (London, 1624)Google Scholar STC 24960 (no pagination), and Wotton, Anthony, Runne From Rome (London, 1624) STC 26005, p. 79.Google Scholar

28. Adams, Simon, “Spain or the Netherlands? The Dilemmas of Early Stuart Foreign Policy,” in Before the Civil War: Essays on Early Stuart Politics and Government, ed. Tomlinson, Howard (New York, 1983), pp. 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29. On the growing clemency of the king toward recusants see CSPD, 80.93; 81.58; 132.91; 129.35, 87; 132.84, 93; 133.20; 149.48.

30. London, Public Record Office, State Papers 14/124/1–9.39 (hereafter cited as SP); another copy in RMD 853.4–9. For other protests against the marriage, see RMD 853.13.f11; Egerton Manuscript 783.1–17, British Library, London; and CSFD, 71.12; 124.3; 115.67, 71; 150.55–57; 152.30; 160.27. See also Fincham, and Lake, , “Ecclesiastical Policy,” pp. 198–202.Google Scholar

31. SP 14/124/1–9.42.

32. Fincham, and Lake, , “Ecclesiastical Policy,” p. 201.Google Scholar On the rise of the Arminian prelates, see Kennedy, D. E., “The Jacobean Episcopate,” Historical Journal 5 (1962): 180, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. On Cambridge Arminianism, see Porter, H. C., Reformation and Reaction in Tudor Cambridge (Cambridge, 1958)Google Scholar.

34. See Tyacke, Nicholas, Anti-Caluinists: The Rise of English Arminianism c. 1590–1640 (Oxford, 1987)Google Scholar, chapter 5.

35. Kautz, Arthur P., “The Selection of Jacobean Bishops,” in Early Stuart Stuthes: Essays in Honor of David Harris Wilson, ed. Reinmuth,, Howard S. Jr (Minneapolis, 1970), p. 177.Google Scholar

36. Loomie, A. J., ed., Spain and the Jacobean Catholics, vol. 68 (London, 1978), p. 146.Google Scholar

37. Fincham and Lake, “Ecclesiastical Policy,” passim; Tyacke, , Anti-Calvinists, pp. 108–123.Google Scholar

38. White, Francis, The Orthodox Faith and Way to the Church (London, 1617)Google Scholar

39. Ibid., p. 106; PP. 42–45.

40. White, , Replie to Jesuit Fisher, p. 104.Google Scholar

41. Tyacke, , Anti-Calvinists, p. 108.Google Scholar

42. CSPD, 90.75, 95, 102.

43. R.B. (Laud), “Relation of a Third Conference,” in White, , Replie to Jesuit Fisher, pp. 66–74.Google Scholar

44. Manuscript 1372, Lambeth Palace Library, London; see also I, James, “Premonition,” pp. 125–128.Google Scholar

45. On Featley, see DNB; Bliss, P., ed., Anthony Wood's Athenae Oxonienses, vol. 3 (London, 1813–1820), pp. 156–169;Google ScholarFeatley, John, Featlaei II αλλγγπνεςλα, Part 2 (London, 1660)Google Scholar STC (Wing) 581, and RMD 47, “Letters and Papers of Daniel Featley.”

46. RMD 47.1.1.If; D. 47.1.7.15f.

47. Accounts of this debate in Featley, The Fisher Catched in His Own Net (Saint Omer, Netherlands, 1623)Google Scholar STC 10732; and Percy, , An Answere to a Pamphlet, Intituled: The Fisher Catched in his Owne Net (Saint Omer, 1623)Google Scholar STC 4957; reprinted in Percy, , True Relations, ERL, vol. 312.Google Scholar

48. Featley, Fisher Catched, preface; Percy, Answere to a Pamphlet, preface.

49. Percy, , Answere to a Pamphlet, pp. 12–43.Google Scholar

50. Featley, , Fisher Catched, pp. 25, 26.Google Scholar

51. Percy, , Answere to a Pamphlet, p. 38.Google Scholar

52. Featley, , Romish Fisher Caught and Held in His Owne Net (London, 1624)Google Scholar, STC 10738, p.*3.

53. Featley, , Fisher Catched, p. 26.Google Scholar

54. Ibid., p. 3.

55. Grayson, Christopher, “James I and the Religious Crisis in the United Provinces 1613–19,” in Reform and Reformation: England and the Continent, c. 1500–1750, ed. Baker, Derek (Oxford, 1979), pp. 195–219.Google Scholar

56. Abbot, George, A Treatise of the Perpetual Visibilitie, and Succession of the True Church in All Ages (London, 1624)Google Scholar STC 39; Ussher, George, A Briefe Declaration of the Universalitie of the Church of Christ, and the Unitie of the Catholic Faith professed therein (London, 1624) STC 24545, p. 46;Google ScholarBernard, RichardLooke Beyond Luther: Or an Answere to that Question, so often and insultingly proposed by our Adversaries (London, 1623)Google Scholar STC 1956; Rogers, Henry, An Answere to Mr. Fisher, the Jesuite, his Five Propositions Concerning Luther (London, 1623)Google Scholar STC 21177. Rogers's preliminary notes on the subject are in Rawlinson Manuscript C. 167, 72–76, Bodleian Library, Oxford University (hereafter cited as RMC); Mayer, John, An Antidote Against Popery: Confected out of Scriptures, Fathers, Councels, and Histories (London, 1625)Google Scholar STC 17729; Bedford, Thomas, Luther's Predecessours: Or An Answere To The Question of the Papists (London, 1624)Google Scholar STC 1787; Walker, George, Fisher's folly unfolded: or The Vaunting Jesuits Vanitie discovered (London, 1624)Google Scholar STC 24959; Wotton, Anthony, Runne From Rome (London, 1624)Google Scholar, STC 26005.

57. (London, 1624) STC 25382.

58. Percy's account of this third debate is found in “A Brief Relation of What passed in a thirde private conference betweene a Bp. and me,” Manuscript. 1372.61v, 62, Lambeth Palace Library, London. This manuscript was expanded and printed in Percy's, True Relations, pp. 37–74.Google Scholar

59. Note William Scott's introduction to the Oxford-Parker edition of this work (Oxford, 1849). See also C. J. Simkinson's more complete introduction to the MacMillan edition of 1901, and especially Laud's dedication to King Charles I, which supplies his side of the story.

60. Montague, Richard (1577–1641), A Gagg for the New Gospelt? No: A Newer Gagg for an Old Goose (London, 1624)Google Scholar STC 18038; Appello Caesarem. A Just Appeale from Two Unjust Informers (London, 1625)Google Scholar STC 18030. Tyacke provides the most thorough discussion of the York house conference in Anti-Calvinists, chapter 7. Montague, , Newer Gagg, pp. 157–170.Google Scholar

61. See DNB, s.v., “White, Francis.”

62. See Tyacke, Anti-Calvinists, chapter 7; also “A Declaration of Dr. White, Dean of Carlisle, touching his approbation of Mr. Richard Montague,” RMC 573.19–92, which contains reasons for White's approbation of Montague's work.

63. See Montague, Richard, Appello Caesarem, pp. vi–vii;Google Scholar and Schwartz, Hillel, “Arminianism and the English Parliament, 1624–1629,” Journal of British Studies 12 (1973): 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

64. White, Peter, “The Rise of Arminianism Reconsidered,” Past and Present 101 (1983): 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

65. Laud, William, Works, 3:139–142.Google Scholar

66. Additional Manuscripts 6469, f.208, 209, British Library, London.