Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T10:07:31.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of percentages of tissues and nutrients between parents and F3 offspring of Oreochromis aurea×Siniperca chuatsi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2007

Wang Jin-Long
Affiliation:
Wuxi Fisheries College, Nanjing Agriculture University, Wuxi 214081, China Ministry of Agriculture Key Open Laboratory for Genetic Breeding of Aquatic Animals and Aquaculture Biology, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuxi 214081, China
Yang Hong
Affiliation:
Wuxi Fisheries College, Nanjing Agriculture University, Wuxi 214081, China Ministry of Agriculture Key Open Laboratory for Genetic Breeding of Aquatic Animals and Aquaculture Biology, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuxi 214081, China
Wu Ting-Ting*
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture Key Open Laboratory for Genetic Breeding of Aquatic Animals and Aquaculture Biology, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuxi 214081, China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: wutt@ffrc.cn

Abstract

This research focused on the effect of distant hybridization to improve the flesh quality of offspring from Oreochromis aurea (♀)×Siniperca chuatsi (♂). The proportions of different tissues and percentages of nutrient components were compared between fish of the F3 generation and O. aurea and S. chuatsi. The results showed that the proportion of flesh in F3 hybrids was significantly lower than that in O. aurea. Crude lipid content was lower and crude protein content significantly higher in the F3 generation. Concentrations of four kinds of amino acids important for flavour (DAA) were higher in the F3 generation than in O. aurea, and the total DAA was significantly higher. Furthermore, the other amino acid contents and essential amino acid index of the F3 generation were intermediate between O. aurea and S. chuatsi. We conclude that some effects of hybridization have induced flesh quality improvement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © China Agricultural University and Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

First published in Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology 2006, 14(6): 879–883

References

Cai, WQ (1980) Fish Feed Science. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press, pp. 114115 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Chen, DY (2003) Comparison of nutrient composition in muscle between distant hybridization crucian carp and its parents. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi 15(3): 6264 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Cui, ZB, Zhu, ZY, Cui, YB, Li, GH and Xu, KS (1995) Studies on food intake and metabolism for F2 red carp carried with human growth hormone genes. Chinese Science Bulletin 40: 15141517 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
FAO/WHO Ad Hoc Exper. Committee (1973) Energy and protein requirements. FAO Nutrition Meeting Report Series 52: 4073.Google Scholar
Fu, C, Cui, YB, Huang, SS and Zhu, ZY (2000) Whole-body amino acid pattern of F4 human growth hormone gene – transgenic red carp (Cyprinus carpio) fed diets with different protein levels. Aquaculture 189: 287292.Google Scholar
Gui, JF (1997) Retrospects and prospects of studies on the mechanism of natural gynogenesis in silver crucian carp (Carassius auratus gibelio). Chinese Science Foundation 1: 1116 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Jiang, YG, Liang, SC and Chen, BD (1983) Biological effects of heterogenous sperm on gynogenesis generation of C. auratus gibelio. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 8(1): 113 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Li, CW, Wu, WX, Xu, DY, Liu, CS and Liu, GA (1990) On the androgenetic offspring from a cross of red common carp with grass carp. Journal of Fisheries of China 14(2): 153156 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Liang, YQ, Cui, XQ and Liu, YL (1998) Evaluation of nutritive quality and analysis of the nutritive compositions in the muscle of mandarin fish, Siniperca chuatsi. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 22(4): 386388 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Lou, YD (1999) Fish Breeding. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, pp. 83105 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Pellett, PL and Yong, VR (1980) Nutritional Evaluation of Protein Foods. Tokyo: The United National University Publishing Company, pp. 2629.Google Scholar
Schwartz, FJ (1972) World Literature to Fish Hybrids with an Analysis by Family, Species, and Hybrid. Mississippi: Publication of the Gulf Coast Research Lab Museum.Google Scholar
Schwartz, FJ (1981) World Literature to Fish Hybrids with an Analysis by Family, Species, and Hybrid: Supplement 1. NOAA Technical Report NMFS SSRF 2750.Google Scholar
Wu, G, Sun, YH and Zhu, ZY (2003) Growth hormone gene transfer in common carp. Aquatic Living Resources 16: 416420.Google Scholar
Yan, AS, Xiong, CX, Qian, JW and Wang, XD (1995) A study on the rate of flesh content of mandarin fish and nutritional quality of the flesh. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University 14(1): 8084 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Yan, XC, Liang, LQ, Cao, DC and Sun, XW (2005) Comparison on muscle nutrients between transgenic carp and common carp. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology 13(4): 528532 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Yang, H, Xia, DQ, Liu, L and Wu, TT (2004) Studies on the hereditary between Oreochromis aurea (♀), Siniperca chuatsi (♂) and their offspring. Journal of Fisheries of China 285: 594598 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Yu, JH, Xia, DQ, Yang, H, He, YH and Wu, TT (2003) Morphology of the progenies of Oreochromis aurea (♀)×Siniperca chuatsi (♂). Journal of Fisheries of China 27(5): 431435 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Yu, TB, You, Y and Yin, JR (2004) A comparison of chemical composition in muscles between Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch) gynogenetic clones and its parents. Journal of Dalian Fisheries University 19(3): 222225 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar