Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-tcbk7 Total loading time: 0.184 Render date: 2021-09-23T02:54:24.953Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

The genetic evaluation of crossbred pig populations for heterosis research by microsatellite markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2007

Zhang Jing-Hu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China Department of Biology, Science and Technology, Zhangzhou Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China
Xiong Yuan-Zhu*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Deng Chang-Yan
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Jiang Si-Wen
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Lei Ming-Gang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Zuo Bo
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Xu De-Qun
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Li Jia-Lian
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Li Feng-E
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Zheng Rong
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
*Corresponding
*Corresponding author. E-mail: xiongyzh@public.wh.hb.cn

Abstract

The molecular genetic characteristics were evaluated, and the genetic effects of marker loci on heterosis of three traits (birth weight, BWT; average daily gain, ADG; and feed and meat ratio, FMR) were analysed in the experimental pig populations: Yorkshire (Y, n=34), Landrace (L, n=46) and Meishan (M, n=55); Yorkshire×Landrace (YL, n=32) and its reciprocal (LY, n=36), Yorkshire×Meishan (YM, n=82) and its reciprocal (MY, n=47), by 39 microsatellite markers selected from pig chromosomes SSC4, 6, 7, 8 and 13. The results indicated that observed alleles ranged from 2 to 6, average 4.13, observed heterozygosity varied from 0.39 (Y) to 0.58 (YM+MY) and average polymorphism information content (PIC) varied from 0.33 (Y) to 0.5 (YM). There were two loci (sw2155 and sw1037) at which the alleles were fixed in Y and L, and there were three loci (sw2409, sw2454 and sw1691) at which the alleles were fixed in M. The results from heterozygosity and kinship analysis revealed an intrinsic genetic relationship among the seven populations. Furthermore, the results on genetic effect analysis indicate that several marker loci had a significant effect on heterosis of the three traits in the two different F1 crossbred populations (P⩽0.01), for example s0161, swr1130 and sw1856 for BWT, sw1856 and swr2036 for ADG, and sw1302 and swr2036 for FMR. The significant marker loci implied a deep genetic relationship between molecular marker loci and heterosis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
China Agricultural University and Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bidanel, JP and Rothschild, M (2002) Current status of quantitative trait locus mapping in pigs. Pig News and Information 23(2): 39N54N.Google Scholar
Bostein, D, White, RL, Skolnick, M and Davis, RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics 32: 314331.Google Scholar
Dieringer, D and Schlötterer, C (2003) Microsatellite Analyzer (MSA) – a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets. Molecular Ecology Notes 3: 167169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laval, G, Iannuccelli, N, Legault, C, et al. (2000) Genetic diversity of eleven European pig breeds. Genetic Selection Evolution 32: 187203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, SJ, Yang, SH, Zhao, SH, et al. (2004) Genetic diversity analyses of 10 indigenous Chinese pig populations based on 20 microsatellites. Journal of Animal Science 82: 368374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nei, M, Tajima, F and Tateno, Y (1983) Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. Journal of Molecular Evolution 19: 153170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reif, JC, Melchinger, AE, Xia, XC, et al. (2003) Genetic distance based on simple sequence repeats and heterosis in tropical maize population. Crop Science 43: 12751282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrer, GA (2000) Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting birth characters and accumulation of backfat and weight in a Meishan–White Composite resource population. Journal of Animal Science 78: 25472553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saitou, N and Nei, M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology Evolution 4: 406425.Google ScholarPubMed
Sun, CQ, Jiang, TB, Fu, YC and Wang, XK (2002) Indica–japonica differentiation of paddy rice and its relationship with heterosis. Plant Breeding 121: 330337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatsuya, Ota (imeg@psuvm.psu.edu) of the Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics and Pennsylvania State University 1993.Google Scholar
Tautz, D (1989) Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source of polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Research 17: 64636471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wada, Y, Akita, T, Awata, T, et al. (2000) Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis in a Meishan×Gottingen cross population. Animal Genetics 31: 376384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, XL, Xun, L and Fredholm, M (2001) Association of microsatellite genomic heterozygosity with inbred pig performance under successive inbreeding. Acta Genetic Sinica 28: 2028.Google Scholar
Zhang, GX, Wang, ZG, Sun, FZ, et al. (2003) Genetic diversity of microsatellite loci in fifty-six Chinese native pig breeds. Acta Genetica Sinica 30: 225233.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, JH, Xiong, YZ and Deng, CY (2005) Correlations of genetic heterozygosity and variance with heterosis in pig populations revealed by microsatellite DNA marker. Asian–Australian Journal of Animal Science 18(5): 620625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, QF, Gao, YJ, Yang, SH, Ragab, RA, Saghai Maroof, MA and Li, ZB (1994) A diallel analysis of heterosis in elite hybrid rice based on RFLPs and microsatellite. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89: 185192.Google Scholar
Zuo, B, Xiong, YZ, Su, YH, Deng, CY, Zheng, R and Jiang, SW (2003) Mapping quantitative trait loci for meat quality on pig chromosomes 3, 4 and 7. Asian–Australian Journal of Animal Science 16: 320324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The genetic evaluation of crossbred pig populations for heterosis research by microsatellite markers
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The genetic evaluation of crossbred pig populations for heterosis research by microsatellite markers
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The genetic evaluation of crossbred pig populations for heterosis research by microsatellite markers
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *