Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-ssw5r Total loading time: 0.234 Render date: 2022-08-17T11:36:23.771Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Changing Property-Rights Regimes: A Study of Rural Land Tenure in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2017

Loren Brandt
Affiliation:
University of Toronto. Email: brandt@chass.utoronto.ca.
Susan H. Whiting*
Affiliation:
University of Washington.
Linxiu Zhang
Affiliation:
Chinese Academy of Sciences. Email: lxzhang.ccap@igsnrr.ac.cn.
Tonglong Zhang
Affiliation:
South China Agricultural University. Email: ztl3@sina.com.
*
Email: swhiting@u.washington.edu (corresponding author).

Abstract

Through two rounds of land contracting, rural households have been allocated a bundle of rights in land. We observe significant differences across villages in the amount of land to which villagers retain a claim and the institutional mechanisms governing the exchange of land rights. This study reveals the perpetuation and expansion of non-market mechanisms accruing to the benefit of village cadres and state officials and only limited emergence of market mechanisms in which households are primary beneficiaries. It identifies factors in economic, political and legal domains that incentivize and enable state officials and local cadres to capture returns from use of land. Relatedly, the study finds differences in conflict over property-rights regimes. Drawing on a pilot survey carried out by the authors in November of 2011 in Shaanxi and Jiangsu provinces (192 households in 24 villages), this paper seeks to explain heterogeneity and change in property-rights regimes over time and across space.

摘要

通过两轮的家庭联产承包, 土地的部分产权已经分到了农户手中。我们观察到不同村之间村民拥有土地的数量和管理土地权利交换的制度机制都存在显著不同。本研究显示有利于村干部和地方政府的行政机制普遍存在, 而有利于农户的市场机制仍然作用有限。本文区分了经济、政治、和法律因素对村干部和地方政府官员形成激励, 并使得他们从土地中获得好处。与此对应, 本文也发现了不同产权机制引起的冲突也不同。基于作者2011 年 11月在江苏省和陕西省进行的初步调查 (24 个村 192 农户), 本文意图解释这一土地产权机制的跨时空变化。

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS University of London 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aoki, Masahiko. 2007. “Endogenizing institutions and institutional changes.” Journal of Institutional Economics 3(1), 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Loren, Rozelle, Scott and Turner, Matthew A.. 2004. “Local government behavior and property right formation in rural China.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160(4), 627662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Loren, and Zhang, Linxiu. 2012. “The impact of the tax for fee reform in rural China.” University of Toronto, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Deininger, Klaus, and Jin, Songqing. 2009. “Securing property rights in transition: lessons from implementation of China's rural land contracting law.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 70, 2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Peter. 2013. “In defense of endogenous, spontaneously ordered development: institutional functionalism and Chinese property rights.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 40(6), 10871118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Samuel P.S., and Lin, George C.S.. 2003. “Emerging land markets in rural and urban China: policies and practices.” The China Quarterly 175, 681707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, Shingo, Otsuka, Keijiro, Sonobe, Tetushi and Rozelle, Scott. 2011. “Efficiency of land allocation through tenancy markets.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 59(3), 485510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kung, James, and Liu, Shouying. 1997. “Farmers’ preferences regarding ownership and land tenure in post-Mao China.” The China Journal 38, 3364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Xiande, Shihai, Wang and Yan, Jia. 2011. “Grain market and policy in China.” In Alpermann, Björn (ed.), Politics and Markets in Rural China. New York: Routledge, 89105.Google Scholar
Lin, George C.S., and Ho, Samuel P.S.. 2005. “The state, land system, and land development processes in contemporary China.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95(2), 411436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBeath, Jenifer Huang, and McBeath, Jerry. 2010. Environmental Change and Food Security in China. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). 2011. Zhongguo tongji nianjian (China Statistical Yearbook) . Beijing: Zhongguo tongji chubanshe.Google Scholar
Peking University National School of Development Comprehensive Research Group. 2012. “Hefa zhuanrang quan shi nongmin caichan xing shouru de jichu” (Legal transfer rights are the foundation of farmers’ asset income). Guoji jingji luntan 2, 127139.Google Scholar
Po, Lanchih. 2008. “Redefining rural collectives in China: land conversion and the emergence of rural share-holding cooperatives.” Urban Studies 45(8), 1603–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosterman, Roy, Zhu, Keliang, Ye, Jianping, Riedinger, Jeffrey, Li, Ping and Yadav, Vandana. 2009. “Secure land rights as a foundation for broad-based rural development in China.” NBR Special Report No. 18 (November).Google Scholar
Schlager, Edella, and Ostrom, Elinor. 1992. “Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis.” Land Economics 68(3), 249262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, Chuanhao, and Jia, Shenghua. 2004. “Nong de zhidu quan wendingxing yu nong shiyong quan shichang fayu lilun laizi Su Zhe Lu jingyan” (Land tenure, tenure security and the development of farmland rental markets: theory and evidence from Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shandong provinces). Jingji yanjiu 1, 112–19.Google Scholar
Whiting, Susan H. 2011. “Values in land: fiscal pressures, land disputes and justice claims in rural and peri-urban China.” Urban Studies 48(3), 569587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Qian Forrest, Ma, Qingguo and Xu, Xu. 2004. “Development of land rental markets in rural Zhejiang: growth of off-farm jobs and institution building.” The China Quarterly 180, 1050–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Changing Property-Rights Regimes: A Study of Rural Land Tenure in China
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Changing Property-Rights Regimes: A Study of Rural Land Tenure in China
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Changing Property-Rights Regimes: A Study of Rural Land Tenure in China
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *