Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T13:49:05.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making the Decision to Remove a Child from Parental Care: Twelve Decision-Making Criteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2015

Karen Broadley
Karen Broadley*
Affiliation:
Child Abuse Prevention Research Australia, Monash Injury Research Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VI 3800, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Monash University, Building 70, Clayton Campus, Clayton VIC 3800. E-mail: karen.broadley@monash.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Removing a child from parental care is an important and difficult decision to make. There are far reaching consequences for the child and family. Whilst there is a plethora of literature in relation to child protection practice generally, research on decision making is minimal. In this practice paper, I present 12 decision-making criteria to assist practitioners make decisions about child removal. It is important for child protection practitioners to apply the same set of principles and consider the same factors when making these decisions. These criteria are as follows: the severity of the abusive incident; the presence of cumulative harm; whether the perpetrator has access to the child; the functioning of the parent; whether the perpetrator has been responsible for child abuse or intimate partner violence in the past; the cooperation of the parent; the intent of the perpetrator; the age of the child; the functioning of the child; the voice and expressed wishes of the child; protective relationships available to the child and the statutory requirement to cause no further harm. Referring to these criteria will assist practitioners be clear and explicit about how they reach a decision, and result in greater consistency of outcome for children and families.

Keywords

child abusechild protectionchild welfarechild removalassessmentdecision making
Type
Articles
Information
Children Australia , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 90 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arad-Davidzon, B., & Benbenishty, R. (2008). The role of workers’ attitudes and parent and child wishes in child protection workers’ assessments and recommendation regarding removal and reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 30 (1), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Law Reform Commission. (2006). Same crime, same time: Sentencing of federal offenders. Sydney: Australian Law Reform Commission.Google Scholar
Barnard, M. (2007). Drug addiction and families. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Benbenishty, R., & Chen, W. (2003). Decision making by the child protection team of a medical center. Health & Social Work, 28 (4), 284–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bessant, J., & Broadley, K. (2014). Saying and doing: Child protective services and participation in decision making. International Journal of Children's Rights, 22, 710–729.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V., Harris, N., & Ivec, M. (2009). Seeking to clarify child protection's regulatory principles. Communities, Children and Families Australia, 4 (1), 7–23.Google Scholar
Britner, P. A., & Mossler, D. G. (2002). Professionals’ decision-making about out-of-home placements following instances of child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26 (4), 317–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broadley, K. (2012). Sex offender risk assessments in the child protection context. Helpful or not? Children Australia, 37 (1), 40–45.Google Scholar
Broadley, K. (2014). Equipping child protection practitioners to intervene to protect children from cumulative harm. The Australian Journal of Social Issues, 49 (3), 365–284.Google Scholar
Broadley, K. (2015). Is there a role for adult protection services in the lives of young people with disabilities transitioning from out-of-home care? Australian Social Work, 68 (1), 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromfield, L., & Higgins, D. (2005). National comparison of child protection systems. Child abuse prevention issues, 22. Retrieved from, https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/national-comparison-child-protection-systems Google Scholar
Cummins, P., Scott, D., & Scales, B. (2012). Report of the protecting Victoria's vulnerable children inquiry. Melbourne: Department of Premier and Cabinet.Google Scholar
Dawe, S., Frye, S., David, B., Moss, D., Atkinson, J., Evans, C., . . . Harnett, P. (2007). Drug use in the family, impacts and implications for children. Canberra: Australian National Council on Drugs.Google Scholar
Dwyer, J., & Miller, R. (2014). Working with famlies where an adult is violent Best interests case practice model Specialist practice resource. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
Forrester, D., & Harwin, J. (2011). Parents who misuse drugs and alcohol effective interventions in social work and child protection. NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbarino, J. (2011). Not all bad treatment is psychological maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35 (10), 797–801.Google Scholar
Gilligan, R. (2003). Promoting resilience in children and young people. Developing Practice: The Child, Youth and Family Work Journal, 5, 29–36.Google Scholar
Goddard, C., Saunders, B. J., Stanley, J. R., & Tucci, J. (1999). Structured risk assessment procedures: Instruments of abuse? Child Abuse Review, 8, 251–263.Google Scholar
Harris, H. (2011). Does responsive regulation offer and alternative? Questioning the role of formalistic assessment in child protection investigations. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 1383–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, S., Forrester, D., Williams, A., & Copello, A. (2014). Parenting and substance misuse: Understanding accounts and realities in child protection contexts. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 1491–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, C. (2012). Is resilience still a useful concept when working with children and young people? Child Family Community Australia, 2, 1–11.Google Scholar
Kaur, J. (2012). Cultural diversity and child protection. Australian research review on the needs of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) and refugee children and families. Queensland Australia: Diversity Consultants.Google Scholar
Kroll, B., & Taylor, A. (2003). Parental substance misuse and child welfare. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Laslett, A., Dietze, P., & Room, R. (2013). Carer drinking and more serious child protection case outcomes. British Journal of Social Work, 43 (7), 1384–1402.Google Scholar
Leitenberg, H., & Saltzman, H. (2003). College women who had sexual intercourse when they were underage minors (13–15): Age of their male partners, relation to current adjustment, and statutory rape implications. Official Journal of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA), 15 (2), 135–147.Google ScholarPubMed
Lindsey, D. (2004). The welfare of children (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lonne, R., Parton, N., Thomson, J. & Harries, M. (2009). Reforming child protection. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
Meddin, B. J. (1985). The assessment of risk in child abuse and neglect case investigations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 9 (1), 57–62.Google Scholar
Mendes, P., Johnson, G., & Moslehuddin, B. (2011). Young people leaving state out-of-home care: A research-based Study of Australian policy and practice. North Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.Google Scholar
Miller, R. (2012). Best interests case practice model: Summary guide. Melbourne: Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
Mossman, D. (2006). Another look at interpreting risk categories. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 29 (1), 41–63.Google Scholar
Ombudsman Victoria. (2010). Own motion investigation into child protection - out of home care. Melbourne: Ombudsman Victoria.Google Scholar
Osmo, R., & Benbenishty, R. (2004). Children at risk: Rationales for risk assessments and interventions. Children and Youth Services Review, 26 (12), 1155–1173.Google Scholar
Reisig, J. A., & Miller, M. K. (2009). How the social construction of “child abuse” affect immigrant parents: Policy changes that protect children and families. International Journal of Social Inquiry, 2 (1), 17–37.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. (2012). Enabling and protecting. Proactive approaches to addressing the abuse and neglect of children and young people with disability. Melbourne: Children with Disability Australia.Google Scholar
Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1997). People studying people artifacts and ethics in behavioral research. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Stokes, J., & Schmidt, G. (2012). Child protection decision making: A factorial analysis using case vignettes. Social Work, 57 (1), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turnell, A., & Edwards, S. (1999). Signs of safety: A solution and safety oriented approach to child protection casework. NY: W. W. Norton & Company Inc.Google Scholar
Turney, D., Platt, D., Selwyn, J., & Farmer, E. (2012). Improving child and family assessments turning research into practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989). Retrieved 13 May, 2013, from http://www.un.org/cyberschoolbus/humanrights/resources/child.asp.Google Scholar
Victorian Child Death Review Committee. (2006). Child death group anlysis: Effective responses to chronic neglect. Melbourne: State Government of Victoria Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
Victorian Government. (2005). Children youth and families act (2005). Melbourne: Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
Victorian Government Department of Human Services. (2007). Cumulative harm: A conceptual overview. Best Interest Series. Melbourne: Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
White, A. (2005). Assessment of parenting capacity: Literature review. Ashfield, New South Wales: New South Wales Department of Community Services.Google Scholar
Wise, S. (2011). All together now. Research examining the separation of siblings in out-of-home care. Victoria: Anglicare Victoria.Google Scholar
Wise, S., Pollock, S., Mitchell, G., Argus, C., & Farquhar, P. (2010). Care-system impacts on academic outcome. Melbourne: Anglicare Victoria/Wesley Mission Victoria.Google Scholar