No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the congenital heart surgery service in Lithuania
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2024
Abstract
Introduction:
CHD is a unique group of medical pathologies. Literature worldwide reports significant decrements in the case volume of patients with these conditions due to the recent global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019. The only centre providing congenital cardiac care for Lithuanian population is in a hospital which was the main medical institution for the sickest coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Hence, this centre had to maintain its service alongside the mobilisation of resources to tackle the crisis.
Aim of Study:
To evaluate the effect of the pandemic on the service of congenital heart surgery in Lithuania.
Methods:
The activity of a single centre providing congenital heart care working in a main coronavirus 2019 pandemic hospital during the pandemic was analysed and compared to a matched period of pre-pandemic activity.
Results:
The number of admitted patients was similar during both pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. During the pandemic period, younger patients were more often operated as urgent cases. Their postoperative length of stay was longer. However, there were no differences in early postoperative mortality between the two groups.
Conclusions:
It was possible to maintain an accessible and high-quality specialised congenital cardiac care for various age patients during global pandemic events, while working in the main pandemic hospital.
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Liu, Y, Chen, S, Zühlke, L, et al. Global birth prevalence of congenital heart defects 1970-2017: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 260 studies. Int J Epidemiol 2019; 48: 455–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Der Linde, D, Konings, EEM, Slager, MA, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 2241–2247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mamasoula, C, Addor, M, Carbonell, CC, et al. Prevalence of congenital heart defects in Europe, 2008-2015: a registry-based study. Birth Defects Res 2022; 114: 1404–1416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edelson, JB, Rossano, JW, Griffis, H, et al. Resource use and outcomes of pediatric congenital heart disease admissions: 2003 to 2016. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moynihan, R, Sanders, S, Michaleff, ZA, et al. Original research: impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review. BMJ 2021; 11: 45343.Google Scholar
Miana, LA, Manuel, V, Antoniali, F, Jatene, MB, Jatene, FB. COVID-19 pandemic implications in paediatric and congenital heart surgery in Brazil. Cardiol Young 2022; 32: 31–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sachdeva, S, Saxena, A, Shakya, S, Ramakrishnan, S, Gupta, SK, Kothari, SS. Changing pattern of congenital heart disease care during COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Pediatr 2021; 88: 899–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cousino, MK, Pasquali, SK, Romano, JC, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CHD care and emotional wellbeing. Cardiol Young 2021; 31: 1–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: Posit Software; 2023. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
1226 Dėl karantino Lietuvos Respublikos teritorijoje paskelbimo [Internet]. Available from: https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/a2b5da801f4a11eb9604df942ee8e443?jfwid=1bfnjeyx0j. Accessed December 5, 2023.Google Scholar
V-1504 Dėl Asmens sveikatos priežiūros paslaugų teikimo esant Lietuvos Respublikos teritorijoje paskelbt… [Internet]. Available from: https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/2f52f311b0a111ea9a12d0dada3ca61b#part_cecf50b61c5f447ca11be53c6d11d5f0. Accessed December 4, 2023.Google Scholar
EMA recommends first COVID-19 vaccine for authorisation in the EU | European Medicines Agency [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-recommends-first-covid-19-vaccine-authorisation-eu. Accessed December 4, 2023.Google Scholar
Comirnaty COVID-19 vaccine: EMA recommends approval for children aged 5 to 11 | European Medicines Agency [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/comirnaty-covid-19-vaccine-ema-recommends-approval-children-aged-5-11. Accessed December 4, 2023Google Scholar
EMA recommends approval of Comirnaty and Spikevax COVID-19 vaccines for children from 6 months of age | European Medicines Agency [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-recommends-approval-comirnaty-spikevax-covid-19-vaccines-children-6-months-age. Accessed December 4, 2023Google Scholar
Pierpont, ME, Brueckner, M, Chung, WK, et al. Genetic basis for congenital heart disease: revisited: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation 2018; 138: e653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdelrahman, O, Diab, R, Abdelrahman, O, Diab, RA. Prevalence and pattern of congenital heart disease among children in Khartoum State, Sudan: a reflection of the current cardiac profile. Cureus 2022; 14(1): e21196.Google Scholar
Kumar Jain, P, Lazarus, M, Tiwari, A, Kumar Athwani, V, Athwani, K. Prevalence and Pattern of Congenital Heart Disease in Pediatric Population-A Study from Central India. International Journal of Recent Surgical and Medical Sciences [Internet]. 2023; 9(1): 39–44.Google Scholar
Stephens, EH, Dearani, JA, Guleserian, KJ, et al. COVID-19: crisis management in congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 11: 395–400. DOI: 10.1177/2150135120931398.Google ScholarPubMed
Shivkumar, S, Mehta, V, Vaddamanu, SK, et al. Surgical protocols before and after COVID-19—A narrative review. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11: 439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chowdhury, SF, Sium, SMA, Anwar, S. Research and management of rare diseases in the COVID-19 pandemic era: challenges and countermeasures. Front Public Health 2021; 9: 640282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sachdeva, S, Saxena, A, Shakya, S, Ramakrishnan, S, Gupta, SK, Kothari, SS. Changing pattern of congenital heart disease care during COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Pediatr 2021; 88: 899–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilarczyk, K, Nina, V, Boshkov, L, et al. Surviving the struggle of COVID-19: practical recommendations for pediatric/Adult cardiology and cardiac surgical programs in resource-limited settings: a review. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 37: 99.Google ScholarPubMed
Aldersley, T, Brooks, A, Human, P, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on a south African pediatric cardiac service: implications and insights into service capacity. Front Public Health 2023; 11: 1177365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puri, K, Allen, HD, Qureshi, AM. Congenital heart disease. Pediatr Rev 2017; 38: 471–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Assadi, A, Laussen, PC, Freire, G, Trbovich, P. Understanding clinician macrocognition to inform the design of a congenital heart disease clinical decision support system. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9: 767378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edelson, JB, Rossano, JW, Griffis, H, et al. Emergency department visits by children with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72: 1817–1825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, JP, Jacobs, ML, Austin, EH, et al. Quality measures for congenital and pediatric cardiac surgery. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2012; 3: 32–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miana, LA, Manuel, V, Caneo, LF, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic in a pediatric and congenital cardiovascular surgery program in Brazil. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 36: 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cifarelli, CP, McMichael, JP, Forman, AG, et al. Surgical start time impact on hospital length of stay for elective inpatient procedures. Cureus 2021; 13(7): e16259.Google ScholarPubMed