Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T12:30:19.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of coronary arterial patterns in complete transposition by laid-back aortography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Shi-Joon Yoo*
Affiliation:
From the Departments of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
Patricia E. Burrows
Affiliation:
From the Departments of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
C. A. Frederic Moes
Affiliation:
From the Departments of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
Cathy MacDonald
Affiliation:
From the Departments of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
William G. Williams
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
Christine Houde
Affiliation:
Paediatrics, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
Brian W. McCrindle
Affiliation:
Paediatrics, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
Robert M. Freedom
Affiliation:
Paediatrics, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
Lee Benson
Affiliation:
Paediatrics, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
*
Dr. Shi-Joon Yoo, Department of Radiology, Sejong Heart Institute, 91-121, Sosa-Bon-2-dong, Sosa-ku, Puchon-shi, Kyunggi-do, 422-232, Korea. Tel. (82-32) 340-1201; Fax. (82-2) 553-6599.

Abstract

For the visualization of the coronary arterial patterns in complete transposition (concordant atrioventricular and discordant ventriculoarterial connections), balloon occlusion aortography has been performed in right and left anterior oblique or in frontal and lateral views. These views, however, are often unsatisfactory because of super-imposition of the aortic sinuses. The so-called “laid-back” view is a newly developed angiographic projection in which the aortic sinuses and the intervening commissures are imaged as if they were seen from below and the front. We performed such laid-back aortography in 36 consecutive patients with an echocardiographic diagnosis of complete transposition. In 23 of 36 patients, we obtained additional aortograms in right and left anterior oblique views. For the evaluation of the diagnostic value of the laid-back view, as compared with that of the combined right and left anterior oblique views, both sets of aortograms were reviewed independently by the five reviewers who were asked to make a diagnosis and to specify their levels of confidence (“definite,” “probable,” and “possible”) for their diagnosis. Error rates were significantly lower for the laid-back aortograms than for the combined right and left aortograms (4 and 11%, respectively). An increased level of confidence was significantly associated with the laid-back aortograms. We illustrate the anatomy of various coronary arterial patterns seen by laid-back aortography.

Type
Original Manuscripts
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Jatene, AD, Fontes, VF, Paulista, PP, Sousa, LCB, Neger, F, Galantier, M, Sousa, JEMR. Anatomic correction of transposition of the great vessels. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976; 72: 364370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Yacoub, MH, Radley-Smith, R. Anatomy of the coronary arteries in transposition of the great arteries and methods for their transfer in anatomical correction. Thorax 1978; 33: 418424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Williams, WG, Freedom, RM, Culham, G, Duncan, WJ, Olley, PM, Rowe, RR, Trusler, GA. Early experience with arterial repair of transposition. Ann Thorac Surg 1981; 32: 815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Kurosawa, H, Imai, Y, Takanashi, Y, Hoshino, S, Sawatari, K, Kawada, M, Takao, A. Infundibular septum and coronary anatomy in Jatene operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 91: 572583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Planché, C, Bruniaux, J, Lacour-Gayet, F, Kachaner, J, Binet, J-P, Sidi, D, Villain, E. Switch operation for transposition of the great arteries in neonates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 96: 354363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Mayer, JE, Sanders, SP, Jonas, RA, Castañeda, AR, Wernovsky, G. Coronary artery pattern and outcome of arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. Circulation 1990; 82 (Suppl IV):IV139–IV145.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Kurosawa, H, Imai, Y, Kawada, M. Coronary arterial anatomy in regard to the arterial switch procedure. Cardiol Young 1991; 1: 5462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Sim, EKW, Van Son, JAM, Edwards, WD, Julsrud, PR, Puga, FJ. Coronary artery anatomy in complete transposition of the great arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57: 890894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Gittenberger-de Groot, AC, Sauer, U, Oppenheimer-Dekker, A, Quaegebeur, J. Coronary arterial anatomy in transposition of the great arteries: A morphologic study. Pediatr Cardiol 1983; 4 (Suppl I): 1523.Google Scholar
10.Gittenberger-de Groot, AC, Sauer, U, Quaegebeur, J. Aortic intramural coronary artery in three hearts with transposition of the great arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 91: 566571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Ebels, T, Meuzelaar, K, Huet, RCGG, Bink-Boelkens, MTE, Cromme-Dijkhuis, A, Bams, JL, Boeve, WJ, Eijgellar, A. Letter to the editor. Neonatal arterial switch operation complicated by intramural left coronary artery and treated by left internal mammary artery bypass graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 97: 473475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Elliott, LP, Amplatz, K, Edwards, JE. Coronary arterial patterns in transposition complexes. Anatomic and angiocardiographic studies. Am J Cardiol 1966; 17: 362378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Sauer, U, Gittenberger-de Groot, AC, Peters, DR, Bühlmeyer, K. Cineangiography of the coronary arteries in transposition of the great arteries. Pediatr Cardiol 1983; 4 (Suppl 1): 2542.Google Scholar
14.Mandell, VS, Lock, JE, Mayer, JE, Parness, IA, Kulik, TJ. The “laid-back” aortogram: An improved angiographic view for demonstration of coronary arteries in transposition of the great arteries. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 13791383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Gittenberger-de Groot, AC. Editorial note. Elucidating coronary arterial anatomy or simplifying coronary arterial nomenclature. Int J Cardiol 1986; 12: 305307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Stein, PD, Sabbah, HN. Orifice-view roentgenography for evaluation of the aortic valve. Am J Roentgenol 1975; 125: 847853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Folger, GM, Sabbah, HN, Stein, PD. Evaluation of the anatomy of congenitally malformed aortic valves by orifice-view aortography. Am Heart J 1980; 100: 152159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed