Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T03:30:20.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does superior caval vein pressure impact head growth in Fontan circulation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2016

Tina Trachsel
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland Children’s Research Centre, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
Christian Balmer
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland Children’s Research Centre, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
Håkan Wåhlander
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland Children’s Research Centre, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
Roland Weber
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland Children’s Research Centre, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
Hitendu Dave
Affiliation:
Division of Congenital Cardiovascular Surgery, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland Children’s Research Centre, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
Andrea Poretti
Affiliation:
Section of Pediatric Neuroradiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States of America
Oliver Kretschmar
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland Children’s Research Centre, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
Anna Cavigelli-Brunner*
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland Children’s Research Centre, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
*
Correspondence to: Dr A. Cavigelli-Brunner, MD, University Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Steinwiesstrasse 75, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland. Tel+41 44 2667111; Fax +41 44 2667981; E-mail: anna.cavigelli@kispi.uzh.ch

Abstract

Background

Patients with bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis have unphysiologically high superior caval vein pressure as it equals pulmonary artery pressure. Elevated superior caval vein pressure may cause communicating hydrocephalus and macrocephaly. This study analysed whether there exists an association between head circumference and superior caval vein pressure in patients with single ventricle physiology.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective analysis of infants undergoing Fontan completion at our institution from 2007 to 2013. Superior caval vein pressures were measured during routine catheterisation before bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis and Fontan completion as well as head circumference, adjusted to longitudinal age-dependent percentiles.

Results

We included 74 infants in our study. Median ages at bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis and Fontan were 4.8 (1.6–12) and 27.9 (7–40.6) months, respectively. Head circumference showed significant growth from bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis until Fontan completion (7th (0–100th) versus 20th (0–100th) percentile). There was no correlation between superior caval vein pressure and head circumference before Fontan (R2=0.001). Children with lower differences in superior caval vein pressures between pre-bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis and pre-Fontan catheterisations showed increased growth of head circumference (R2=0.19).

Conclusions

Patients with moderately elevated superior caval vein pressure associated with single ventricle physiology did not have a tendency to develop macrocephaly. There is no correlation between superior caval vein pressure before Fontan and head circumference, but between bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis and Fontan head circumference increases significantly. This may be explained by catch-up growth of head circumference in patients with more favourable haemodynamics and concomitant venous pressures in the lower range. Further studies with focus on high superior caval vein pressures are needed to exclude or prove a correlation.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jaquiss, RDB, Imamura, M. Single ventricle physiology: surgical options, indications and outcomes. Curr Opin Cardiol 2009; 24: 113118.Google Scholar
2. Barron, DJ, Kilby, MD, Davies, B, Wright, JGC, Jones, TJ, Brawn, WJ. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Lancet 2009; 374: 551564.Google Scholar
3. Dillon, T, Berman, W Jr, Yabek, SM, Seigel, R, Akl, B, Wernly, J. Communicating hydrocephalus: a reversible complication of the Mustard operation with serial hemodynamics and long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 1986; 41: 146149.Google Scholar
4. Karmazyn, B, Dagan, O, Vidne, BA, Horev, G, Kornreich, L. Neuroimaging findings in neonates and infants from superior vena cava obstruction after cardiac operation. Pediatr Radiol 2002; 32: 806810.Google Scholar
5. Kollar, CD, Johnston, IH, Sholler, GF. Communicating hydrocephalus secondary to a cardiac tumour compressing the superior vena cava. Childs Nerv Syst 2001; 17: 117120.Google Scholar
6. Markowitz, RI, Kleinman, CS, Hellenbrand, WE, Kopf, G, Ment, LR. Communicating hydrocephalus secondary to superior vena caval obstruction. Occurrence after Mustard’s operation for transposition of the great arteries. Am J Dis Child 1984; 138: 638641.Google Scholar
7. McLaughlin, JF, Loeser, JD, Roberts, TS. Acquired hydrocephalus associated with superior vena cava syndrome in infants. Childs Nerv Syst 1997; 13: 5963.Google Scholar
8. Rosman, NP, Shands, KN. Hydrocephalus caused by increased intracranial venous pressure: a clinicopathological study. Ann Neurol 1978; 3: 445450.Google Scholar
9. Sweeney, MF, Bell, WE, Doty, DB, Schieken, RM. Communicating hydrocephalus secondary to venous complications following intraatrial baffle operation (mustard procedure) for d-transposition of the great arteries. Pediatr Cardiol 1982; 3: 237240.Google Scholar
10. Williams, H. The venous hypothesis of hydrocephalus. Med Hypotheses 2008; 70: 743747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Gil, Z, Specter-Himberg, G, Gomori, M, et al. Association between increased central venous pressure and hydrocephalus in children undergoing cardiac catheterization. Child’s Nervous System 2001; 17: 478482.Google Scholar
12. Rekate, H. Treatment of hydrocephalus. In: Albright L, Pollack I, Adelson D, (eds). Principles and Practice of Pediatric Neurosurgery. Thieme Medical, New York, 1999: 4773.Google Scholar
13. Braegger, C, Jenni, OG, Konrad, D, Molinari, L. Neue Wachstumskurven für die Schweiz. Paediatrica 2011; 22: 911.Google Scholar
14. Vogt, KN, Manlhiot, C, van Arsdell, G, Russell, JL, Mital, S, McCrindle, BW. Somatic growth in children with single ventricle physiology impact of physiologic state. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 18761883.Google Scholar
15. Ravishankar, C, Zak, V, Williams, IA, et al. Association of impaired linear growth and worse neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with single ventricle physiology: a report from the pediatric heart network infant single ventricle trial. J Pediatr 2013; 162: 2506.e2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Burnham, N, Ittenbach, RF, Stallings, VA, et al. Genetic factors are important determinants of impaired growth after infant cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140: 144149.Google Scholar