Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T20:34:20.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Balloon atrial septostomy and pre-operative brain injury in neonates with transposition of the great arteries: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

Angelo Polito*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
Zaccaria Ricci
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
Tiziana Fragasso
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
Paola E. Cogo
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
*
Correspondence to: Dr A. Polito, MD, MPH, Department of Cardiology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Piazza Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165 Rome, Italy. Tel: +39 066859 2258; Fax: +39 066859 2670; E-mail: angelo.polito@opbg.net

Abstract

Objective

To perform a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the effects of balloon atrial septostomy on peri-operative brain injury in neonates with transposition of the great arteries.

Data source

We conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify all observational studies that included neonates born with transposition of the great arteries who had peri-operative evidence of brain injury.

Study selection and data extraction

The search strategy produced three prospective and two retrospective cohort studies investigating the association between balloon atrial septostomy and brain injury totalling 10,108 patients. In two studies, the outcome was represented by the presence of a coded diagnosis of a clinically evident stroke at discharge, whereas in three studies the outcome was represented by the finding of pre-operative brain injury identified by magnetic resonance scans.

Data synthesis

The overall brain injury rate for neonates who underwent balloon atrial septostomy versus control patients was 60 of 2273 (2.6%) versus 45 of 7835 (0.5%; pooled odds ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence intervals, 0.93–3.89; p = 0.08). A subgroup analysis of the three studies that used pre-operative brain injury as the primary outcome found no significant association between balloon atrial septostomy and brain injury (pooled odds ratio, 2.70; 95% confidence intervals, 0.64–11.33; p = 0.17). Balloon atrial septostomy frequency was 22.4% (2273 of 10,108), with reported rates ranging from 20% to 75%.

Conclusion

Our analysis shows that balloon atrial septostomy is not associated with increased odds for peri-operative brain injury. Balloon atrial septostomy should still be used for those patients with significant hypoxaemia, haemodynamic instability, or both.

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Report of the New England Regional Infant Cardiac Program. Pediatrics 1980; 65: 375461.Google Scholar
2. Mahle, WT, Tavani, F, Zimmerman, RA, et al. An MRI study of neurological injury before and after congenital heart surgery. Circulation 2002; 106: I109I114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Dent, CL, Spaeth, JP, Jones, BV, et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities after the Norwood procedure using regional cerebral perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131: 190197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. McQuillen, PS, Barkovich, AJ, Hamrick, SE, et al. Temporal and anatomic risk profile of brain injury with neonatal repair of congenital heart defects. Stroke 2007; 38: 736741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Newburger, JW, Jonas, RA, Wernovsky, G, et al. A comparison of the perioperative neurologic effects of hypothermic circulatory arrest versus low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass in infant heart surgery. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 10571064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Bellinger, DC, Jonas, RA, Rappaport, LA, et al. Developmental and neurologic status of children after heart surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest or low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 549555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Liebman, J, Cullum, L, Belloc, NB. Natural history of transpositon of the great arteries. Anatomy and birth and death characteristics. Circulation 1969; 40: 237262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Rashkind, WJ, Miller, WW. Creation of an atrial septal defect without thoracotomy. A palliative approach to complete transposition of the great arteries. JAMA 1966; 196: 991992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Block, AJ, McQuillen, PS, Chau, V, et al. Clinically silent preoperative brain injuries do not worsen with surgery in neonates with congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140: 550557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Mukherjee, D, Lindsay, M, Zhang, Y, et al. Analysis of 8681 neonates with transposition of the great arteries: outcomes with and without Rashkind balloon atrial septostomy. Cardiol Young 2010; 20: 373380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Petit, CJ, Rome, JJ, Wernovsky, G, et al. Preoperative brain injury in transposition of the great arteries is associated with oxygenation and time to surgery, not balloon atrial septostomy. Circulation 2009; 119: 709716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Applegate, SE, Lim, DS. Incidence of stroke in patients with d-transposition of the great arteries that undergo balloon atrial septostomy in the University Healthsystem Consortium Clinical Data Base/Resource Manager. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76: 129131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Beca, J, Gunn, J, Coleman, L, et al. Pre-operative brain injury in newborn infants with transposition of the great arteries occurs at rates similar to other complex congenital heart disease and is not related to balloon atrial septostomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 18071811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Stroup, DF, Berlin, JA, Morton, SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283: 20082012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Juni, P, Witschi, A, Bloch, R, Egger, M. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA 1999; 282: 10541060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. (RevMan), R. Version 5.1, Nordic Cochrane Center. Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011.Google Scholar
17. Borenstein, MHL, Higgins, J, Rothstein, H. Comprehensive Meta-analysis Version 2. Biostat, Englewood NJ, 2005.Google Scholar
18. Bellinger, DC, Newburger, JW, Wypij, D, Kuban, KC, duPlesssis, AJ, Rappaport, LA. Behaviour at eight years in children with surgically corrected transposition: the Boston Circulatory Arrest Trial. Cardiol Young 2009; 19: 8697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Chandar, JS, Wolfe, SB. Displacement of preexisting thrombus by umbilical vein catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol 1994; 15: 311312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Licht, DJ, Shera, DM, Clancy, RR, et al. Brain maturation is delayed in infants with complex congenital heart defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137: 529536; discussion 536–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. McQuillen, PS. Magnetic resonance imaging in congenital heart disease: what to do with what we see and don't see? Circulation 2009; 119: 660662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar