No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 March 2016
A new factor has recently reemerged: financial transfers from South to North. Reemerged, for it was also a common occurrence in earlier colonial periods.
— Ivan Leigh Head
Written over fifteen years ago by Ivan Leigh Head, a highly distinguished Canadian international lawyer, foreign policy expert, and international development thinker, the words contained in the above quotation point firmly at this great man’s analytic incisiveness and hint at the sheer depth of his fairness of mind. For although the net transfer of resources from the much poorer geopolitical “South” to a far richer “North” remains to this day one of the most important obstacles to international development, rarely have the dominant accounts of international development given this phenomenon the pride of place that it surely deserves. Ivan Head was therefore well ahead of his time in foregrounding, highlighting, and criticizing this very disturbing, yet continuing, feature of South-North relations.
1 See Head, I. L., “South North Dangers” (1989) 68 Foreign Affairs 71 at 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 I owe this expression to the title of the famous artistic production “The Phantom of the Opera.”
3 See Our Common Interest: Report of the Commission for Africa (London: Commission for Africa, 2005), available at <http://news.bbc.co.uk/i/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/11_03_05africa.pdf (last visited on 16 April 2005) [Blair Commission Report].
4 Ibid, at 54.
5 Ibid.
6 See Head, “South-North Dangers,” supra note 1 at 85.
7 See Canadian International Development Agency, Policy Statement, Canada Making a Difference in the World: A Policy Statement on Strengthening and Effectiveness (September 2005), available at <http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca/aideffectiveness> (last visited on 21 March 2005).
8 See Paris Principles on Aid Effectivenes (Declaration of the Paris High-Level Forum, 2 March 2005), available at <http://wwwi.worldbank.org/harmonization/paris/finalparisdeclaration.pdf> (last visited on 21 March 2005).
9 See Blair Commission Report, supra note 3 at 32.
10 See Head, “South-North Dangers,” supra note ι at 79.
11 See Blair Commission Report, supra note 3 at 24.
12 Ibid, at 41.
13 See Head, “South-North Dangers,” supra note 1 at 79.
14 See Blair Commission Report, supra note 3 at 24.
15 See ibid, at 32.
16 Ibid.
17 See Head, “South-North Dangers,” supra note 1 at 86.
18 See Blair Commission Report, supra note 3 at 48–53.
19 Ibid, at 50.
20 Ibid, at 48.
21 Ibid. at 50.
22 Ibid. at 53.
23 Ibid. at 295.
24 See Head, I. L., “The Contribution of International Law to Development” (1987) 25 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 29 at 30.Google Scholar
25 Ibid, at 36–38.
26 See Agbakwa, S. C., “A Line in the Sand: International Disorder and the Impugnity of Non-State Corporate Actors in the Developing World,” in Anghie, A., et al., eds., The Third World and International Order: Law, Politics and Globalization (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003) at 1.Google Scholar
27 See Gathii, J. T., “The Legal Status of the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties” (2002) 15 Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 292 at 293–95. Google Scholar
28 See Blair Commission Report, supra note 3 at 51.
29 See Koskenniemi, M., “The Place of Law in Collective Security” (1996) 17 Michigan journal of International Law 455.Google Scholar
30 See Blair Commission Report, supra note 3 at 56.
31 See Head, I. L., On a Hinge of History: The Mutual Vulnerability of South and North (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991).Google Scholar
32 See Head, “South-North Dangers,” supra note ι at 86.