Article contents
Reply to Leo Panitch's Review Article “Corporatism: A Growth Industry Reaches the Monopoly Stage”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2009
Extract
Leo Panitch is at the same time far too generous and mistaken when he sees my book as representing the coming of the monopoly stage in the development of the growth industry of corporatism. If I were, by writing the first book-length work on the theory of corporatism, to succeed in cornering the vigorous international market in ideas, then this would be praise indeed. Of course, the notion is absurd and is as flawed as Panitch's reading of the book.
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 1988 , pp. 819 - 822
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1988
References
1 Leo, Panitch, “Corporatism: A Growth Industry Reaches the Monopoly Stage,” this JOURNAL 21 (1988), 813–18.Google Scholar
2 These issues are examined in two forthcoming books from our comparative research project on government-industry relations in consumer electronics and telecommunications. See Alan Cawson, Peter Holmes, Kevin Morgan, Anne Stevens and Douglas Webber, Hostile Brothers: Competition and Closure in the European Electronics Industry (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989); and Alan Cawson, The Japanization of Europe? Conflicting Strategies in the European Consumer Electronics Industry (London: Sage, 1989).
3 Pierre, Birnbaum, States and Collective Action: The European Experience (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
4 See in particular Claus Offe, Contradictions of the Welfare State (London: Hutchinson, 1984); Bob, Jessop, The Capitalist State (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1982Google Scholar), chap. 5; and Ian, Gough, The Political Economy of the Welfare State (London: Macmillan, 1979).Google Scholar
5 Geoffrey, Ingham, Capitalism Divided: The City and Industry in British Social Development (London: Macmillan, 1984).Google Scholar
6 Mainly so far in unpublished papers based on ongoing research. Michael Moran is in the Department of Government, University of Manchester.
- 1
- Cited by