Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:41:36.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neurology and the Community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

T.J. Murray
T.J. Murray*
Affiliation:
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Neurology has a proud tradition, built on the established principles of medicine, the scientific method of the 17th century and the clinical approach of the French and later the English schools of neurology in the 19th century and the first half of this century. In the post World War II era neurology was advanced by the development of neurological training centers, the discovery of new pharmacological and neurosurgical therapies, and most recently by in the exciting advances in neurogenetics. These changes have broadened and advanced the scope of our discipline by focusing on the disease processes that affect the nervous system. I would like to suggest an additional conceptual framework to broaden it further. That concept is a population health perspective that should place our various approaches in closer relationship to the communities they serve.

Type
Neurological Practice
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , August 1996 , pp. 231 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1996

References

1. The Social Responsibility of the Medical School: A View From the 15th Floor. (Presidential Address. Association of Canadian Medical Colleges, 1990) ACMC Forum, Vol XXII, No 5–4, 23–26.Google Scholar
2. Ackerkrecht, EH. Rudolf Virchow. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wl, 1953, pp 126.Google Scholar
3. Engel, GL. How Much Longer Must Medicine’s Science be Bound by a Seventeenth Century World View? From: The Task of Medicine: Dialogue at Wickenburg. Kerr L White. 1988, 113–136.Google Scholar
4. Schroder, SA. On squeezing balloons: cost control fails again. N Engl J Med 1991; 325(15): 1099–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Ontario Health Data. Sources, Characteristics and Use in Planning Medical Education. EFPO Working Paper #8. EFPO Coordinating Centre. McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5.Google Scholar
6. Baxter, DW. Prospects for Canadian medical neurology. The JC Richardson Lecture. Can J Neurol Sci 1975; 2: 101–107.Google Scholar
7. Report of the Working Party in Neurology to the Requirements Committee on Physician Manpower. Published by the Authority of the Minister of National Health and Welfare, 1975.Google Scholar
8. Murray, TJ. Relevance in undergraduate neurological teaching. Can J Neurol Sci 1977; 4: 131–137.Google Scholar
9. Murray, TJ. Concepts in undergraduate neurological education. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1977; 79: 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Mancall, EL., Murray, TJ., Swick, HM., et al. A model clinical neuroscience curriculum. Neurology 1987; 37: 1697–1699.Google Scholar
11. Educating Future Physicians for Ontario: What People of Ontario Need and Expect from Physicians. Working Document. EFPO Coordinating Centre. McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton Ontario L8N 3Z5.Google Scholar
12. Murray, TJ. Medical education and society. Can Med Assoc J 1995; 153(10): 1433–1436.Google ScholarPubMed
13. Murray, TJ. Training and Retaining Medical Faculty in Developing Countries. Pearson Notes. 1995; Vol. 8(5): 13–15.Google Scholar
14. World Health Organization. Report of the International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata, 1978. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
15. World Federation for Medical Education. The Edinburgh Declaration. Lancet 1988; 2: 464.Google Scholar
16. Panel on the General Professional Education of Physician and College Preparation for Medicine: Physicians for the Twenty-First Century: The GPEP Report, Washington DC, Association of American Medical Colleges, 1984.Google Scholar
17. World Federation for Medical Education (1988). Report of the World Conference on Medical Education. World Federation for Medical Education, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
18. White, KL., Connelly, JE. The Medical School’s Mission and the Population’s Health. New York. Springer-Verlag 1992: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Menken, M., Hopkins, A., Walton, H. Statement on Medical Education in Neurology: The Working Group for Neurology and the World Federation for Medical Education. Medical Education 1994; 28: 271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar