Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:59:17.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Charcot et Babinski: au-delà de la simple relation professeur-élève

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Rami Massie
Rami Massie*
Affiliation:
Université McGill, Montréal, Québec, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Charcot and Babinski: beyond a simple teacher-student relationship. Jean-Martin Charcot (18251893) is now considered to be the father of clinical neurology in France. He trained a generation of eminent neurologists, among them Joseph Babinski, with whom he had a special relationship. Babinski was undoubtedly Charcot's favorite pupil and they enjoyed an excellent collaboration at la Salpétrière. Even though both men felt tremendous respect for each other, it is sad that this relationship may, in one instance, have been detrimental to Babinski. This is probably the reason why Bouchard denied him full professorship, a decision with eventual consequences for both men. In spite of this, the neurologist of Polish origin held his master in tremendous admiration, even as he pursued Charcot's research on hysteria after his death. Even though Babinski eventually contradicted his master on many fundamental issues, it did not affect his devotion to him. The relationship between the two men can be considered as more than a simple relationship between a teacher and his pupil and may be compared to a father-son relationship, which is a reminder of the original model of Hippocratic teaching.

Type
Historical Neuroscience
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , August 2004 , pp. 422 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2004

References

1.Guillain, G.J-M Charcot, sa vie, son œuvre. Paris: Masson et Cie, 1955.Google Scholar
2.Daudet, L.Souvenirs I. Paris: Nouvelle Librairie Nationale, 1915.Google Scholar
3.Goetz, CG.Charcot, The Clinician, The Tuesday Lessons. New York: Raven Press, 1987.Google Scholar
4.Satran, R.Fulgence Raymond, the successor of Charcot. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1974;50(8):931–942.Google Scholar
5.Iragui, V.The Charcot-Bouchard controversy. Arch Neurol 1986;43:290–295.Google Scholar
6.Dartigues, L.Faisceau scriptural, vol. 3. Paris: G. Dom, 1932.Google Scholar
7.Babinski, J.Éloge de J.-M. Charcot. Revue neurologique I, 6:745–756.Google Scholar
8.Charcot, J-M.La foi qui guérit. The faith healing. Revue hebdomadaire. Paris: Plon, 1892.Google Scholar
9.Goetz, CG.Charcot and the aging brain. Arch Neurol 2002;59:1821–1824.Google Scholar
10.Kyle, R, Shampo, M.Jean-Baptiste-Étienne-Auguste Charcot. JAMA 1984; 252(2):257.Google Scholar
11.Gasecki, A.Hachinski, V.On the names of Babinski. Can J Neurol Sci 1996; 23: 76–79.Google Scholar
12.McHenry, LC.Garrison’s History of Neurology. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas Publisher, 1969.Google Scholar
13.Van, Gijn. The Babinski Sign, a Centenary. Universiteit Utrecht, 1996.Google Scholar
14.Charpentier, A.Un grand médecin, Joseph Babinski, (1857-1932). Paris: La typographie François Bernouard Dr, 1934.Google Scholar
15.Tournay, A.La vie de Joseph Babinski. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Company, 1967.Google Scholar
16.Babinski, J.Étude anatomique et clinique sur la sclÉrose en plaques. Paris, Masson, 1885.Google Scholar
17.Bonduelle, M, Gelfand, T, Goetz, CG.Charcot: un grand médecind dans son siècle. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
18.Thuillier, J.Monsieur Charcot de la Salpêtrière. Paris: Éditions Robert Laffont, 1993.Google Scholar
19.Freud, S.Pre-psychoanalytic Publications and Unpublished Drafts. Strachey, J, Freud, A (Eds.) London, Hogarth, Toronto, Irwin, 1966, vol. 1 (1886-1899).Google Scholar