Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T12:57:52.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The OCP as a synchronic constraint in Arabic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Eiman Mustafawi
Eiman Mustafawi*
Affiliation:
Qatar University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper provides evidence for the activity of the Obligatory Contour Principle (OCP) as a constraint on dynamic alternations in the synchronic grammar of Qatari Arabic. It shows that the OCP is subject to proximity and to a gradient similarity effect. In Qatari Arabic, there are two variable phonological alternations that interact with the OCP, affrication and lenition. The velar stops /g/ and /k/ affricate to [ʤ] and [ʧ], respectively, when adjacent to [i(:)]. However, affrication is blocked when the outcome includes a sequence of segments that are highly similar. Lenition applies variably to the phoneme /ʤ/, which surfaces as [ʤ] or [j]. Usually, the probability of lenition applying to its eligible candidates is around the level of chance. The process, however, applies categorically when a violation of the OCP would otherwise be incurred. The data are analyzed within the framework of Optimality Theory.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article présente des preuves de l’activité du Principe du contour obligatoire (PCO) comme contrainte sur les alternances dynamiques dans la grammaire synchronique de l’arabe qatari. L’article montre que le PCO est sujet à la proximité et à un effet variable de similarité. Dans l’arabe qatari, il y a deux alternances phonologiques variables qui interagissent avec le PCO : l’affrication et la lénition. Les occlusives vélaires /g/ et subissent l’affrication devenant [ʤ] and [ʧ] respectivement lorsqu’elles sont adjacentes à [i(:)]. Cependant, l’affrication est bloquée lorsque le résultat comporte une séquence de segments très similaires. La lénition s’applique de manière variable au phonème /ʤ/, donnant [ʤ] ou [j]. D’habitude la probabilité que la lénition s’applique aux candidats susceptibles de subir la lénition est au niveau du hasard. Le processus, cependant, s’applique de manière catégorique dans le cas où une violation du PCO en résulterait. Les données sont analysées dans le cadre de la Théorie de l’Optimalité.

Keywords

OCPphonological variationaffricationlenitionQatari ArabicPCOvariation phonologiqueaffricationlénitionarabe qatari
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , July 2011 , pp. 229 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-amadidhi, Darwish. 1985. Lexical and sociolinguistic variation in Qatari Arabic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Al-Osaybi’i, ‘A. 1992. Al-dirāsāt al-ṣawtiyya ‘ind ‘ulamā’ al-’arabiyya. [The phonetic studies of the Arab scholars]. Tripoli: Mansh ūrāt kulliyyat al-da’wa al-’islamiyya wa lajnat al-hifāẕ ‘alā al-turāth al-’islamî.Google Scholar
Al-Sulaiti, Latifa. 1993. Some aspects of Qatari Arabic phonology and morphology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Anís, I. 1992. Al-’aswãt al-lughawiyya. [Linguistic sounds]. Al-Qãhira: Maktabat al-anglo-misriyya.Google Scholar
Anttila, Arto. 1997. Deriving variation from grammar. In Variation, change and phonological theory, ed. Hinskens, Frans, Hout, Roeland van, and Wetzels, Leo, 35–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anttila, Arto and Cho, Y.Y.. 1998. Variation and change in Optimality Theory. Lingua 104:31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auger, Julie. 2001. Phonological variation and Optimality Theory: Word-initial vowel epenthesis in Vimeu Picard. Language Variation and Change 13:253–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 1997. How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. In Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, ed. Son, R.J.J.H. van, 21:43–58. University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 1998. Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam. [Published as LOT dissertations 11. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.]Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul and Hayes, Bruce. 2001. Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32:45–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantineau, Jean. 1936. Etudes sur quelques parlers de nomades arabes d’Orient. Annales de l’Institut d’Études Orientales (AIEO) 2:1–118.Google Scholar
Cavar, M. 2004. Palatalization in Polish: An interaction of articulatory and perceptual factors. Doctoral dissertation, University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries. 2004. What it means to be a loser: Non-optimal candidates in Optimality Theory. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries and Pater, Joe. 2008. Weighted constraints and gradient restrictions on place co-occurrence in Muna and Arabic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26:289–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Jennifer and Iskarous, Khalil. 2001. Consonant place identification. In The role of speech in perceptual phonology, ed. Hume, Elizabeth and Johnson, Keith, 104–121. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène. 2000. Consonant cluster phonotactics: A perceptual approach. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Fischer, Wolfdietrich. 1997. Classical Arabic. In The Semitic languages, ed. Hetzron, Robert, 187–219. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frisch, Stefan A. and Zawaydeh, Bushra. 2001. The psychological reality of OCP-Place in Arabic. Language 77:91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Stefan A., Pierrehumbert, Janet, and Broe, Michael. 2004. Similarity avoidance and the OCP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22:179–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I. 2003. The initial state and verbal stems in Arabic. Ms., Utrecht Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1950. The patterning of root morphemes in Semitic. Word 5:162–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, Michael (1994). An OT account of variability in Walmatjari stress, http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/20-0794/20-0794-HAMMOND-0-0.PDF.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1986. Inalterability in CV phonology. Language 62:321–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce and Wilson, Colin. 2008. A maximum Entropy Model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. Linguistic Inquiry 39:379–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics. 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, T.M. 1965. The sound change “j > y” in the Arabic dialects of Peninsular Arabia. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 28:233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, T.M. 1967. Eastern Arabian dialect studies. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, T.M. 1978. The affrication of ‘Kaf’ and ‘Qaf’ in the Arabic dialects of the Arabian Peninsula. In Readings in Arabic linguistics, ed. Al-Ani, Salman, 285–303. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Keer, Edward. 1999. Geminates, The OCP and the nature of CON. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1993. Variable rules. Handout distributed at the Rutgers Optimality Workshop 1.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert. 2001. An effort-based approach to consonant lenition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leben, William. 1973. Suprasegmental phonology. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Matar, Abdulaziz. 1969. Khasāis al-lahjat al-kuwaytiyya. [The pecularities of the Kuwaiti dialect]. Al-Kuwait: Matābi’ al-risāla.Google Scholar
Matar, Abdulaziz. 1985. Al-’aswāt al-’arabiyya fi lahjāt al-xalij. [Arabic authenticity in the dialects of the Gulf]. Al-Riyādh: Dār ‘ālam al-kutub lil-nashr wa al-tawzì‘.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1986. OCP Effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 207–263.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1988. Feature geometry and dependency: A review. Phonetica 45:84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1994. The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology, vol. III: Phonological structure and phonetic form, ed. Keating, Patricia, 191–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mrayati, Mohamad. 1987. Statistical studies of Arabic language roots. In Applied Arabic linguistics and signal and information processing, ed. Descout, Raymond, 97–103. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing.Google Scholar
Mustafawi, Eiman. 2006. An optimality theoretic approach to variable phonological alternations in Qatari Arabic. Doctoral dissertation. University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Mustafawi, Eiman. 2007. Affrication in North Arabic revisited. Perspectives on Arabic linguistics vol. XIX: Papers from the annual symposium on Arabic Linguistics, ed. Benmamoun, Elabbas, 151–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Naomi and Reynolds, Bill. 1997. Optimality theory and variable word-final deletion in Faetar. Language Variation and Change 9:27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, Jaye. 1992. OCP subsidiary features. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 22, ed. Schafer, Amy J., 335–346.Google Scholar
Pater, Joe. 2009. Weighted constraints in generative linguistics. Cognitive Science 33:999–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1993. Dissimilarity in the Arabic verbal roots. Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 23, ed. Schafer, Amy J., 367–381.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan and Smolensky, Paul. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Bill. 1994. Variation and phonological theory. Doctoral dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon. 2000. Rethinking geminates, long-distance geminates, and the OCP. Linguistic Inquiry 31:85–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolensky, Paul and Legendre, Geraldine. 2006. The harmonic mind: From neural computation to Optimality-Theoretic Grammar, vol. I: Cognitive architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Keiichiro. 1998. A typological investigation of dissimilation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Versteegh, Kees. 1997. Landmarks in linguistic thought, vol. III: The Arabic linguistic tradition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1988. The obligatory contour principle and phonological rules: A loss of identity. Linguistic Inquiry 19:65–100.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1989. Feature geometry and cooccurence restrictions. Phonology 6:349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Younes, Munther. 1994. On emphasis and hi in Arabic. In Perspectives on Arabic linguistics, vol. VI: Papers from the sixth symposium on Arabic linguistics, ed. qEid, Mushira, Cantarino, Vicente, and Walters, Keith, 215–233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar