Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T13:40:49.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Royal Skousen. Analogical Modelling of Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 1989. Pp. xi + 212. US$49.00 (hardbound).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Sheila Embleton*
Affiliation:
York University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anttila, Raimo 1972 An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo 1977 Analogy. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo 1991 Field Theory of Meaning and Semantic Change. Linguistic Agency University of Duisburg, Series A, Paper No. 301. Duisburg: LAUD.Google Scholar
Becker, Thomas 1990 Analogie und morphologische Theorie. Münchner Universitäts-Schriften — Philosophische Fakultät, Studien zur Theoretischen Lin guistik 11.) Munich: Fink. [University of Munich dissertation.]Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. 1978 Language Variation and Linguistic Competence. Pp. 8595 in Lin guistic Variation: Models and Methods. Sankoff, David, ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. 1980 Variation in the Group and the Individual: The Case of Final Stop Deletion. Pp. 154 in Locating Language in Time and Space. Labov, William, ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Holyoak, Keith J., and Thagard, Paul 1989 Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction. Cognitive Science 13:295355.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1973 Productivity in Phonology. Pp. 169176 in Issues in Phonologi cal Theory: Proceedings of the Urbana Conference on Phonology. Kenstowicz, Michael J. and Kisseberth, Charles W., eds. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
KKTK = Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus [Research Centre for Domestic Languages] (n.d.) Microfiche of statistical analysis of approximately 610,000 words of text from 26 issues of Suomen Kuvalehti [1975:36 to 1976:11]. Helsinki: KKTK.Google Scholar
Laalo, Klaus 1988 Imperfektimuotojen ti ~ si-vaihtelu suomen kielessä. [ti ~ si Alternation of the Imperfect Forms in the Finnish language.] Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura. [University of Helsinki dissertation.]Google Scholar
Laalo, Klaus 1991 Riittääkö analogia yksin – eikö sääntöjä tarvita? [Does Analogy Alone Suffice — Or Does One not Need Rules?] Virittäjä 95:8588 [Review of Skousen, 1989.]Google Scholar
Labov, William 1973 The Boundaries of Words and Their Meanings. Pp. 340373 in New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English. Bailey, Charles-James N. and Shuy, Roger, eds. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, James L., and Rumelhart, David E. 1980 An Interactive Activation Model of the Effect of Context in Perception. Center for Human Information Processing (CHIP) 91. La Jolla: Center for Human Information Processing, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar