Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-fkkrz Total loading time: 0.257 Render date: 2021-06-16T21:28:52.306Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

On the Movement Theory of Obligatory Control: Voices from Standard Indonesian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Yosuke Sato
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore

Abstract

Image of the first page of this article. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.
Type
Squib/Notule
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Aldridge, Edith. 2008. Phase-based account of extraction in Indonesian. Lingua 118:14401469.Google Scholar
Arka, I Wayan. 2004. Control and argument structure: Explaining control into subject in Indonesian. Paper presented at the 4th International Symposium on Malay and Indonesian Linguistics (ISMIL), 2627 July, Jakarta, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan and Landau, Idan. 2009. Icelandic control is not A-movement: The case from case. Linguistic Inquiry 40:113154.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric and Hornstein, Norbert. 2003. Reply to Culicover and Jackendoff, “Control is not movement”. Linguistic Inquiry 34:269280.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric and Hornstein, Norbert. 2004. Movement under control. Linguistic Inquiry 35:431452.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric and Hornstein, Norbert. 2006. Control in Icelandic and theories of control. Linguistic Inquiry 37:591606.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric, Hornstein, Norbert, and Nunes, Jairo. 2010. Icelandic control really is A-movement: Reply to Bobaljik and Landau, “Icelandic control is not A-movement”. Linguistic Inquiry 41:111130.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 1976. An object-creating rule in Bahasa Indonesia. Linguistic Inquiry 7:4187.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter and Hermon, Gabriella. 1998. The typology of Wh-movement: Wh-questions in Malay. Syntax 1:221258.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella, and Yanti, . 2008. Voices in Malay/Indonesian. Lingua 118: 15001553.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter and Jackendoff, Ray. 2001. Control is not movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32:492512.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter and Jackendoff, Ray. 2003. The semantic basis of control in English. Language 79:517556.Google Scholar
Davies, William. 2005. Madurese control. Kata 7:4863.Google Scholar
Davies, William and Dubinsky, Stanley. 2004. The grammar of raising and control. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davies, William and Dubinsky, Stanley. 2007. New horizons in the analysis of control and raising. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Davies, William and Kurniawan, Eri. 2010. Indonesian complement clause types with special attention to crossed control. Paper presented at the Fourteenth International Symposium on Malay/Indonesian Linguistics (ISMIL), April 30-May 2, University of Minnesota, USA.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1975. The language of thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2002. The prefixes di- and N- in Malay/Indonesian dialects. In The history and typology of Western Austronesian voice systems, ed. Wouk, Fay and Malcolm, Ross, 241283. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1992. Reference and control. In Control and grammar, ed. Larson, Richard, Iatridou, Sabine, Lahiri, Uptal, and Higginbotham, James, 79108. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30:6996.Google Scholar
Kurniawan, Eri. 2010. Distinguishing raising and control in Sundanese. Paper presented at Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association XVII (AFLA), May 79, Stony Brook University, USA.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2003. Movement out of control. Linguistic Inquiry 34:471498.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2004. The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22:811877.Google Scholar
Lebeaux, David. 1985. Locality and anaphoric binding. Linguistic Review 4:343363.Google Scholar
Nomoto, Hiroki. 2008. A unified analysis of funny control. Paper presented at the 12th International Symposium on Malay/Indonesian Linguistics, 2627 June, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria and Potsdam, Eric. 2008. The syntax and semantics of wanting in Indonesian. Lingua 118:1617-1639.Google Scholar
Saddy, Douglas. 1991. WH-scope mechanisms in Bahasa Indonesia. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15: More papers on wh-movement, ed. Cheng, Lisa and Demirdash, Hamida, 183218. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar
Sato, Yosuke. 2010. Minimalist interfaces: Evidence from Indonesian and Javanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Terzi, Arhonto. 1992. PRO in finite clauses: A study of the inflectional heads of the Balkan languaes. Doctoral dissertation. City University of New York.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Akira. 1993. Agr-based case theory and its interaction with the A-bar system. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11:203238.Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

On the Movement Theory of Obligatory Control: Voices from Standard Indonesian
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

On the Movement Theory of Obligatory Control: Voices from Standard Indonesian
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

On the Movement Theory of Obligatory Control: Voices from Standard Indonesian
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *