Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:46:10.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The utility of the prehospital electrocardiogram

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2015

Matthew T. Davis ,
Adam Dukelow ,
Shelley McLeod ,
Severo Rodriguez  and
Michael Lewell
Matthew T. Davis*
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Western Ontario, London ON Southwest Ontario Regional Base Hospital Program, London Health Sciences Corporation, London, ON
Adam Dukelow
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Western Ontario, London ON Southwest Ontario Regional Base Hospital Program, London Health Sciences Corporation, London, ON
Shelley McLeod
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Western Ontario, London ON
Severo Rodriguez
Affiliation:
Southwest Ontario Regional Base Hospital Program, London Health Sciences Corporation, London, ON
Michael Lewell
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Western Ontario, London ON Southwest Ontario Regional Base Hospital Program, London Health Sciences Corporation, London, ON
*
E1-100 Westminster Tower, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, ON N6A 5W9; Phone: (519) 685-8500 ext. 76089; Fax: (519) 667-6769

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) can capture valuable information in the prehospital setting. By the time patients are assessed by an emergency department (ED) physician, their symptoms and any ECG changes may have resolved. We sought to determine whether the prehospital electrocardiogram (pECG) could influence ED management and how often the pECG was available to and reviewed by the ED physician.

Methods:

A retrospective medical record review was conducted on a random sample of patients ≥ 18 years who had a prehospital 12-lead ECG and were transported to one of two tertiary care centres. Data were recorded onto a standardized data extraction tool. Three investigators independently compared the pECG to the first ECG obtained in the ED after patient arrival at the hospital. Any abnormalities not present on the ED ECG were adjudicated to ascertain whether they had the potential to change ED management.

Results:

Of 115 ambulance runs selected, 47 had no pECG attached to the ambulance call record (ACR) and another 5 were excluded (one ST elevation myocardial infarction, one cardiac arrest, three ACR missing). Of the 63 pECGs reviewed, 16 (25%) showed changes not apparent on the initial ED ECG (κ = 0.83; 95% CI 0.74–0.93), of which 12 had differences that might influence ED management (κ = 0.76; 95% CI 0.72–0.82). Only one hospital record contained a copy of the pECG, despite the current protocol that paramedics print two copies of the pECG on arrival in the ED (one copy for the ACR and one to be handed to the medical personnel). None of 110 ED charts documented that the pECG was reviewed by the ED physician.

Conclusion:

The pECG has the potential to influence ED management. Improvement in paramedic and physician documentation and a formal pECG handover process appear necessary.

Keywords

acute coronary syndromeelectrocardiogramemergency medical servicesprehospital
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 13 , Issue 6 , November 2011 , pp. 372 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2011

References

REFERENCES

1.Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Part 7: the era of reperfusion: section 1: acute coronary syndromes (acute myocardial infarction). The American Heart Association in collaboration with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Circulation 2000;102(8 Suppl):I136-9.Google Scholar
2.Antman, EM, Anbe, DT, Armstrong, PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction - executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation 2004;110:588–636, doi: 10.1161/ 01.CIR.0000134791.68010.FA.Google Scholar
3.Crocco, TJ, Sayre, MR, Aufderheide, TP. Prehospital triage of chest pain patients. Prehosp Emerg Care 2002;6:224–8, doi: 10.1080/10903120290938599.Google Scholar
4.Jacobs, AK, Antman, EM, Faxon, DP, et al. Development of systems of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: executive summary. Circulation 2007;116:217–30, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.184043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Dracup, K, Alonzo, AA, Atkins, JM, et al. The physician’s role in minimizing prehospital delay in patients at high risk for acute myocardial infarction: recommendations from the National Heart Attack Alert Program: Working Group on Educational Strategies to Prevent Prehospital Delay in Patients at High Risk for Acute Myocardial Infarction. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:645–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Emergency department: rapid identification and treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction: National Heart Attack Alert Program Coordinating Committee, 60 minutes to Treatment Working Group. Ann Emerg Med 1994;23: 311–29, doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(94)70045-1.Google Scholar
7.Schull, MJ, Vaillancourt, S, Donovan, L, et al. Underuse of prehospital strategies to reduce time to reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients in 5 Canadian provinces. CJEM 2009;11:473–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Morrison, LJ, Brooks, S, Sawadsky, B, et al. Prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram impact on acute myocardial infarction treatment times and mortality: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:84–9, doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2006. tb00989.x.Google Scholar
9.Karagounis, L, Ipsen, SK, Jessop, MR, et al. Impact of field-transmitted electrocardiography on time to in-hospital thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:786–91, doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90352-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Kudenchuk, PJ, Maynard, C, Cobb, LA, et al. Utility of the prehospital electrocardiogram in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes: the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention (MITI) Project. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:17–27, doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00175-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Kereiakes, DJ, Weaver, WD, Anderson, JL, et al. Time delays in the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a tale of eight cities. Report from the Pre-hospital Study Group and the Cincinnati Heart Project. Am Heart J 1990;120:773–80, doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(90)90192-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Turnipseed, SD, Amsterdam, EA, Laurin, EG, et al. Frequency of non-ST segment elevation injury patterns on prehospital electrocardiograms. Prehosp Emerg Care 2010;14: 1–5, doi: 10.3109/10903120903144924.Google Scholar
13.Diercks, DB, Kontos, MC, Chen, AY, et al. Utilization and impact of pre-hospital electrocardiograms for patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: data from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53: 161–6, doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.030.Google Scholar
14.Adams, GL, Campbell, PT, Adams, JL. Effectiveness of prehospital wireless transmission of electrocardiograms to a cardiologist via hand-held device for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:1160–4, doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.05.042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Brainard, AH, Raynovich, W, Tandberg, D, et al. The prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram’s effect on time of initiation of reperfusion therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature. Am J Emerg Med 2005; 23:351–6, doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.02.004.Google Scholar
16.Drew, BJ, Sommargren, CE, Schindler, DM, et al. Novel electrocardiogram configurations and transmission procedures in the prehospital setting: effect on ischemia and arrhythmia determination. J Electrocardiol 2006;39(4 Suppl): S157-60, doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2006.05.033.Google Scholar
17.Cudnik, MT, Peacock, F, Diercks, DB, et al. Prehospital electrocardiograms (ECGs) do not improve the process of emergency department care in hospitals with higher usage of ECGs in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Clin Cardiol 2009;32:668–74, doi: 10.1002/clc. 20673.Google Scholar
18.Millar-Craig, MW, Joy, AV, Adamowicz, R, et al. Reduction in treatment delay by paramedic ECG diagnosis of myocardial infarction with direct CCU admission. Heart 1997;78:456–61.Google Scholar