Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T14:34:00.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LO85: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding opioid use in the pediatric emergency department

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2018

M. A. Fowler*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta/Stollery Children’s Hospital, Edmonton, AB
S. Ali
Affiliation:
University of Alberta/Stollery Children’s Hospital, Edmonton, AB
N. Poonai
Affiliation:
University of Alberta/Stollery Children’s Hospital, Edmonton, AB
K. Dong
Affiliation:
University of Alberta/Stollery Children’s Hospital, Edmonton, AB
S. Gouin
Affiliation:
University of Alberta/Stollery Children’s Hospital, Edmonton, AB
A. Drendel
Affiliation:
University of Alberta/Stollery Children’s Hospital, Edmonton, AB
E. Jun
Affiliation:
University of Alberta/Stollery Children’s Hospital, Edmonton, AB
M. Sivakumar
Affiliation:
University of Alberta/Stollery Children’s Hospital, Edmonton, AB
*
*Corresponding author

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: Inadequate pain management in children is ubiquitous in the emergency department (ED). As the current national opioid crisis has highlighted, physicians are caught between balancing pain management and the risk of long term opioid dependence. This study aimed to describe pediatric emergency physicians (PEPs) willingness to prescribe opioids to children in the ED and at discharge. Methods: A unique survey tool was created using published methodology guidelines. Information regarding practices, knowledge, attitudes, perceived barriers, facilitators and demographics were collected. The survey was distributed to all physician members of Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC), using a modified Dillmans Tailored Design method, from October to December 2017. Results: The response rate was 49.7% (124/242); 53% (57/107) were female, mean age was 43.6 years (+/− 8.7), and 58% (72/124) had pediatric emergency subspecialty training. The most common first line ED pain medication was ibuprofen for mild, moderate and severe musculoskeletal injury (MSK-I)-related pain (94.4% (117/124), 89.5% (111/124), and 62.9% (78/124), respectively). For moderate and severe MSK-I, intranasal fentanyl was the most common opioid for first (35.5% (44/124) and 61.3% (76/124), respectively) and second line pain management (41.1% (51/124) and 20.2% (25/124), respectively). 74.8% (89/119) of PEPs reported that an opioid protocol would be helpful, specifically for morphine, fentanyl, and hydromorphone. Using a 0-100 scale, physicians minimally worried about physical dependence (13.3 +/−19.3), addiction (16.6 +/−19.8), and diversion of opioids (32.8+/−26.4) when prescribing short-term opioids to children. They reported that the current opioid crisis minimally influenced their willingness to prescribe opioids (30.0 +/−26.2). Physicians reported rarely (36%; 45/125) or never (28%; 35/125) completing a screening risk assessment prior to prescribing opioids. Conclusion: Ibuprofen remains the most common medication recommended for MSK-I pain in the ED and at discharge. Intranasal fentanyl was the top opioid for all pain intensities. PEPs are minimally concerned regarding dependence, addiction, and the current opioid crisis when prescribing short-term opioids to children. There is an urgent need for robust evidence regarding the dependence and addiction risk for children receiving short term opioids in order to create knowledge translation tools for ED physicians. Opioid specific protocols for both in the ED and at discharge would likely improve physician comfort in responsible and adequate pain management for children.

Type
Oral Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2018