Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:19:23.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implications of the SARS outbreak for Canadian emergency departments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Howard Ovens*
Affiliation:
Schwartz–Reisman Emergency Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; and Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Jim Thompson
Affiliation:
Emergency Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Charlottetown, PEI; and Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
Marion Lyver
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
Michael J. Murray
Affiliation:
Ontario SARS Scientific Advisory Committee
Grant Innes
Affiliation:
Emergency Medicine, Providence Health Care and St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC; and departments of Emergency Medicine and Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
*
Director, Division of Emergency Services, Mount Sinai Hospital, Rm. 206, 600 University Ave., Toronto ON M5G 1X5; howard.ovens@utoronto.ca

Summary of recommendations in order of priority

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Develop national standards for emergency department design and operations.

2. Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation should develop ED specific accreditation standards to insure compliance with Recommendation 1.

3. Regional resources to be developed to implement infection control aspects of ED design and operations.

4. Implementation of a national strategy for ED information systems to ensure access to real-time data.

5. Eliminate ED overcrowding by ensuring adequate long-term and acute-care resources and enforcing strict adherence to occupancy limits.

6. Develop relationships and enhance communication between public health and the emergency community.

7. Call a National Forum on the shortage of human resources in emergency medicine and nursing and related issues.

8. Develop national and regional strategies for communication of important notices and information, and departmental tools for dissemination and education such as nurse clinicians.

9. Rapid triage assessment of arriving patients by appropriately trained nurses at all times should be a national standard.

Type
CAEP Position Statement • Déclaration de Position de l’ACMU
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2003

References

1.Croskerry, P, Sinclair, D. Emergency medicine: A practice prone to error? Can J Emerg Med 2001;3(4):2716.Google Scholar
2.Health Services Directorate. Guidelines for establishing standards for special services in hospitals: emergency units. Report of the Subcommittee on Institutional Program Guidelines. Ottawa: Health and Welfare Directorate, Health and Welfare; 1988:41.Google Scholar
3.Ontario Ministry of Health. Guidelines for Hospital Emergency Units in Ontario. 1989.Google Scholar
4.Sublett, S. Is it time to close your hospital’s ER? CMAJ 1991; 145(11):148992.Google Scholar
5.Thompson, JM, Berscheid, R, Butt, P, Dodd, G, Drummond, A, MacLellan, K, et.al, for the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. Recommendations for the management of rural, remote and isolated emergency health care facilities in Canada. Available: http://www.caep.ca/002.policies/002-01.guidelines/recommendations/rural.htm (accessed 2003 June 29).Google Scholar
6.Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Emergency Department Standards Working Group. Draft Standards for Hospital Emergency Services in Ontario. Aug 2000.Google Scholar
7.Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Working Group on the Future of Emergency Medicine in Canada. The future of emergency medicine in Canada: submission from the CAEP to the Romanow Commission. Part 1. Can J Emerg Med 2002;4(5):35968.Google Scholar
8.Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. Canadian Emergency Department Information Systems (CEDIS). Available: www.caep.ca/002.policies/002-03.cedis.htm (accessed 2003 June 29).Google Scholar
9.Innes, G, Murray, M, Grafstein, E, for the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) working group. A consensus-based process to define standard national data elements for a Canadian emergency department information system. Can J Emerg Med 2001;3(4):27784.Google Scholar
10.Grafstein, E, Unger, B, Bullard, M, Innes, G, for the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Working Group. Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Presenting Complaint List (Version 1.0). Can J Emerg Med 2003;5(1):2734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians and the National Emergency Nurses Affiliation. Access to acute care in the setting of emergency department overcrowding [joint position statement]. Can J Emerg Med 2003;5(2):816. Also available: www.caep.ca/002.policies/002-01.guidelines/overcrowding-march2003.htm (accessed 2003 June 4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. Available: www.caep.ca/002.policies/002-01.guidelines/SARS/002-01i.SARS.htm (accessed 2003 June 4).Google Scholar
13.Beveridge, R, Clarke, B, Janes, L, Savage, N, Thompson, J, Dodd, G, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation guidelines. Can J Emerg Med 1999;1(3 Suppl) [English and French]. Also available: www.caep.ca/002.policies/002-02.ctas.htm (accessed 2003 June 4).Google Scholar
14.Warren, D, Jarvis, A, Leblanc, L, for the National Triage Task Force members. Canadian Paediatric Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation guidelines for emergency departments. Can J Emerg Med 2001;3(4 Suppl):S127. Available: www.caep.ca/004.cjem-jcmu/004-00.cjem/vol-3.2001/cptas-egtp/cptas-e1.htm#main (accessed 2003 June 4).Google Scholar