Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-vmcqm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-13T04:04:07.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clinical diagnosis of clavicle fractures: a pilot study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Jim Landine*
The Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont.
Robert McGraw
The Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont.
William Pickett
the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
Department of Emergency Medicine, 76 Stuart St., Kingston ON K7L 2V7;


Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Clavicle fractures are commonly encountered in the emergency department (ED). Our objective was to determine whether emergency physicians can clinically predict the presence and location of a clavicle fracture prior to obtaining x-rays.


Over a 16-month period we prospectively studied ED patients who had injuries compatible with a clavicle fracture. Following clinical examination and prior to obtaining radiographs, ED physicians or senior emergency medicine (EM) residents were asked to predict whether the clavicle was fractured and, if fractured, the location of the fracture. Clinical predictions were later compared to the radiologist’s report.


Between April 1999 and August 2000, 184 patients with possible clavicle fracture were seen and 106 (58%) were enrolled. Of these, 94 had an acute fracture, and all 94 fractures were predicted on clinical grounds prior to x-ray. In 6 cases, physicians predicted a fracture but the radiograph was negative. In 6 additional cases, physicians were clinically unsure and the radiograph was negative. Physicians correctly predicted fracture location in 83 of 94 cases (88%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 82%–95%). In the 64 cases where physicians predicted a middle third fracture, they were 100% accurate (95% CI, 95%–100%). Errors made by physicians were conservative; that is, they occasionally predicted fractures in patients with only soft tissue injury, but they did not “miss” existing fractures.


The results of this pilot study suggest that ED physicians can clinically predict the presence and location of clavicle fractures with a high degree of accuracy. It may be that x-rays are not always necessary in patients suspected of having a clavicle fracture. Future studies should define the indications for diagnostic radiography in patients with suspected clavicle fractures.

EM Advances • Progrès De La MU
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2001


1.Rockwood, CA, Green, DP.Fractures in adults. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.Google Scholar
2.Adams, CF.The genuine works of Hippocrates. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1939.Google Scholar
3.Allman, FC.Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1967;49:77484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Neer, CS.Fracture of the distal clavicle with detachment of coracoclavicular ligaments in adults. J Trauma 1963;3:99110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Andersen, K, Jensen, PO, Lauritzen, J.Treatment of clavicular fractures. Figure-of-eight bandage versus a simple sling. Acta Orthop Scand 1987;58(1):714.Google Scholar
6.Dandy, DJ.Essential orthopedics and trauma. 2nd rev. New York: Churchill-Livingstone; 1993.Google Scholar
7.Rowe, CR.An atlas of anatomy and treatment of mid-clavicular fractures. Clin Orthop 1968;58:2942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Penn, I.The vascular complications of fractures of the clavicle. J Trauma 1964;4:81931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Neer, CS.Non-union of the clavicle. JAMA 1960;172:100611.Google Scholar
10.Nordqvist, A, Petersson, C, Redlund-Johnell, I.The natural course of lateral clavicle fracture. 15 (11–21) year follow-up of 110 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1993;64(1):8791.Google Scholar