Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:47:55.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TAXONOMIC REVISION OF NEARCTIC, MEXICAN, AND WEST INDIAN OODINI (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Yves Bousquet
Yves Bousquet
Affiliation:
Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eight genera and 25 species are recognized among the Nearctic, Mexican, and West Indian Oodini. Four new species are described: Oodinus pseudopiceus (type locality: Hillsborough River St. Pk., Hillsborough Co., Florida); Oodinus similis (type locality: San Quintín, Chiapas, Mexico); Oodinus darlingtoni (type locality: Cauto El Cristo, Oriente, Cuba); and Oodinus edentulus (type locality: 31.8 mi E Francisco Escárcega, Campeche, Mexico). Oodes fluvialis LeConte, 1863, previously recognized as a subspecies of O. americanus Dejean, 1826, is given specific status. The following new synonymies are established: Eulachnocrepis Habu, 1956 with Lachnocrepis LeConte, 1853; Stenocrepis texana (LeConte, 1863), S. chalcas Bates, 1882, and S. chalcochrous Chaudoir, 1883 with S. insulana (Jacquelin du Val, 1857); Stenocrepis quatuordecimstriata (Chaudoir, 1843), S. picipes (LeConte, 1844), S. stenocephala (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1851), and S. sulcata Chevrolat, 1863 with S. mexicana (Chevrolat, 1835). Lectotypes are designated for Oodinus alutaceus (Bates, 1882), Oodes amaroides Dejean, 1831, O. fluvialis LeConte, 1863, O. americanus Dejean, 1826, Stenocrepis texana (LeConte, 1863), S. chalcas Bates, 1882, S. lecontei (Chaudoir, 1857), S. quatuordecimstriata (Chaudoir, 1843), S. picipes (LeConte, 1844), S. cuprea (Chaudoir, 1843), S. tibialis (Chevrolat, 1834), S. femoralis (Chaudoir, 1835), S. elegans (LeConte, 1851), and S. gratiosa (Bates, 1882). The genus-group name Nanodes Habu, 1956, a homonym of Nanodes Schönherr, 1825, is replaced by Nanodiodes, new replacement name. For each genus treated, the following are provided: citation of original description and selected references, notes about synonymy (if required), description, geographical distribution and diversity, and monophyly and phylogenetic relationships. For each species included, the following are given: citation of original description and synonymies, type material, etymology (for new species only), notes about synonymy (if required), diagnosis, description, geographical distribution, bionomics, and phylogenetic relationships (if the genus includes more than two species). Keys to genera and, for each genus, to species are included. The species distributions are mapped, and the important structural features are illustrated.

Résumé

L’auteur reconnaît huit genres et 25 espèces parmi les espèces néarctiques, mexicaines et antillaises de la tribu Oodini. Quatre nouvelles espèces sont décrites : Oodinus pseudopiceus (localité-type : Hillsborough River St. Pk., Comté de Hillsborough, Floride); Oodinus similis (localité-type : San Quintín, Chiapas, Mexique); Oodinus darlingtoni (localité-type : Cauto El Cristo, Oriente, Cuba); et Oodinus edentulus (localité-type : 31.8 mi E Francisco Escárcega, Campeche, Mexique). On donne un statut spécifique à Oodes fluvialis LeConte, 1863 qui était précédemment traité comme sous-espèce de O. americanus Dejean, 1826. L’auteur établit la synonymie suivante : Eulachnocrepis Habu, 1956 avec Lachnocrepis LeConte, 1853; Stenocrepis texana (LeConte, 1863), S. chalcas Bates, 1882, et S. chalcochrous Chaudoir, 1883 avec S. insulana (Jacquelin du Val, 1857); Stenocrepis quatuordecimstriata (Chaudoir, 1843), S. picipes (LeConte, 1844), S. stenocephala (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1851), et S. sulcata Chevrolat, 1863 avec S. mexicana (Chevrolat, 1835). Il désigne un lectotype pour les espèces Oodinus alutaceus (Bates, 1882), Oodes amaroides Dejean, 1831, O. fluvialis LeConte, 1863, O. americanus Dejean, 1826, Stenocrepis texana (LeConte, 1863), S. chalcas Bates, 1882, S. lecontei (Chaudoir, 1857), S. quatuordecimstriata (Chaudoir, 1843), S. picipes (LeConte, 1844), S. cuprea (Chaudoir, 1843), S. tibialis (Chevrolat, 1834), S. femoralis (Chaudoir, 1835), S. elegans (LeConte, 1851), et S. gratiosa (Bates, 1882). Le nom générique Nanodes Habu, 1956, un homonyme de Nanodes Schönherr, 1825, est remplacé par le nouveau nom Nanodiodes. Pour chaque genre traité, on fournit les informations suivantes : citation de la description originale et de références sélectionnées, notes sur la synonymie (si nécessaire), une description, des notes sur la distribution géographique et la diversité, ainsi qu’une discussion sur le monophylétisme et les relations phylogénétiques. On donne pour chaque espèce la citation de la description originale et la synonymie, la description du matériel-type, l’étymologie (pour les nouvelles espèces seulement), des notes sur la synonymie (si nécessaire), une diagnose, une description, la distribution géographique, des notes sur l’habitat, et une discussion des relations phylogénétiques (si le genre compte plus de deux espèces). Des tableaux de détermination des genres et des espèces ainsi que des cartes de répartition géographique des espèces sont inclus et les caractères structuraux importants sont illustrés.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 128 , Issue 3 , June 1996 , pp. 443 - 537
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, R.T., and Ball, G.E.. 1980. Synopsis of Mexican taxa of the Loxandrus series (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Pterostichini). Transactions of the American Entomological Society 105: 481–575.Google Scholar
Alluaud, C. 1916. Contributions à l'étude des Carabiques d'Afrique et de Madagascar [Col.]. XII. Observations sur le genre Melanodes Chaud. et descriptions de deux espèces nouvelles. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 1916: 226–230.Google Scholar
Andrewes, H.E. 1933. Notes on oriental Carabidae—VII. The Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 69: 55–57.Google Scholar
Andrewes, H.E. 1940. Keys to some Indian genera of Carabidae (Col.). X. The genus Oodes. The Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London, Ser. B, Taxonomy 9: 203–208.Google Scholar
Antoine, M. 1961. Coléoptères carabiques du Maroc. Quatrième partie. Mémoires de la Société des Sciences Naturelles et Physiques du Maroc, Zoologie (N.S.) 8: 467–537.Google Scholar
Arndt, E. 1991. Familie: Carabidae. pp. 45–141 in Klausnitzer, B., Die Larven der Käfer mitteleuropas. 1. Band: Adephaga. Goecke & Evers, Krefeld. 273 pp.Google Scholar
Ball, G.E. 1960. Carabidae (Latreille, 1810). pp. 55–181in Arnett, R.H. Jr., The Beetles of the United States (a Manual for Identification). Part 1. Archestomata [sic!] and Adephaga. The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ball, G.E. 1979. Conspectus of carabid classification: History, holomorphology, and higher taxa. pp. 63–111 in Erwin, T.L., Ball, G.E., Whitehead, D.R., and Halpern, A.L. (Eds.), Carabid Beetles: Their Evolution, Natural History, and Classification. Junk, The Hague. 635 pp.Google Scholar
Ball, G.E., and Shpeley, D.. 1983. The species of eucheiloid Pericalina: Classification and evolutionary considerations (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Lebiini). The Canadian Entomologist 115: 743–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthe, E. 1920. Tableaux analytiques illustrés des Coléoptères de la Faune Franco-Rhénane (France, Hollande, Belgique, Région rhénane, Valais). Uzès. 472 pp.Google Scholar
Basilewsky, P. 1949. Contributions à l'étude des Coléoptères Carabidae du Congo Belge. IV. Revision du genre Systolocranius Chaudoir (Carabidae Oodinae). Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 25: 1–19.Google Scholar
Basilewsky, P. 1953. Carabidae (Coleoptera Adephaga). Exploration du Parc National de l'Upemba, fasc. 10. Institut des Parcs Nationaux du Congo Belge, Bruxelles. 252 pp. (+ 10 pls.).Google Scholar
Bates, H.W. 1873. On the geodephagous Coleoptera of Japan. The Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1873: 219–322.Google Scholar
Bates, H.W. 1878. On new genera and species of Geodephagous Coleoptera from Central America. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London (1878): 587–609.Google Scholar
Bates, H.W. 1882. Insecta. Coleoptera. Vol. 1, part 1. pp. 41–152 in Godman, F.D., and Salvin, O. (Eds.), Biologia Centrali Americana. Taylor and Francis, London. 316 pp.Google Scholar
Bates, H.W. 1884. Insecta. Coleoptera. Vol. 1, part 1. Supplement. pp. 256–316 in Godman, F.D., and Salvin, O. (Eds.), Biologia Centrali Americana. Taylor and Francis, London. 316 pp.Google Scholar
Bates, H.W. 1892. Viaggio di Leonardo Fea in Birmania e regioni vicine. XLIV. List of the Carabidae. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova (Ser. 2) 12: 267–428.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W.S. 1910. An illustrated descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera or beetles (exclusive of the Rhynchophora) known to occur in Indiana—with bibliography and descriptions of new species. The Nature Publishing Co., Indianapolis, IN. 1386 pp.Google Scholar
Bonelli, F.A. 1810. Observations Entomologiques. Première partie (cicindélètes et portion des carabiques) [with the “Tabula Synoptica exhiben genera Carabicorum in sectiones et stirpes disposita”]. Turin. 58 pp.Google Scholar
Bousquet, Y. 1987. Notes about the relationships of the Callistini (= Chlaeniini) (Coleoptera: Carabidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin 41: 165–166.Google Scholar
Bousquet, Y., and Larochelle, A.. 1993. Catalogue of the Geadephaga (Coleoptera: Trachypachidae, Rhysodidae, Carabidae including Cicindelini) of America North of Mexico. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 167: 397 pp.Google Scholar
Bøving, A.G. 1910. Nye bidrag til Carabernes udviklingshistorie. I. Larver til Calathus, Olisthopus, Oodes og Blethisa. Entomologiske Meddelelser 2: 319–376.Google Scholar
Burgeon, L. 1935. Les Oodini du Congo Belge (Col. Carabidae). Revue de Zoologie et de Botanique Africaines 26: 233–238.Google Scholar
Brullé, G.A. 1838. Insectes de l'Amérique méridionale recueillis par Alcide d'Orbigny. In Voyage dans l'Amérique meridionale … par Alcide d'Orbigny, vol. 2. Paris. pp. 17–56. [Not seen.]Google Scholar
Buquet, J.B.L. 1834. Description de deux insectes nouveaux du genre Oodes. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 3: 473–475.Google Scholar
Chaudoir, M. de. 1835. Description de quelques genres et espèces de carabiques nouveaux. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 4: 429–448.Google Scholar
Chaudoir, M. de. 1843. Carabiques nouveaux. Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 16: 671–791.Google Scholar
Chaudoir, M. de. 1856. Mémoire sur la famille des carabiques. 6-e partie. Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 29 (3): 187–291.Google Scholar
Chaudoir, M. de. 1857. Mémoire sur la famille des carabiques. 6-e partie. (Continuation.) Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 30(3): 1–64.Google Scholar
Chaudoir, M. de. 1876. Catalogue des cicindélètes et des carabiques recueillis par M. Achille Raffray, en Abyssinie, avec la description des espèces nouvelles. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie Pure et Appliquée (Ser. 3) 4: 329–388.Google Scholar
Chaudoir, M. de. 1878. Essai monographique sur les panagéides. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 21: 83–186.Google Scholar
Chaudoir, M. de. 1882. Monographie des oodides 1re partie. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (6e Série) 2: 317–378.Google Scholar
Chaudoir, M. de. 1883. Monographie des oodides 2e partie. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (6e Série) 2: 485–554.Google Scholar
Chevrolat, L.A.A. 1834. Coléoptères du Mexique. Silbermann, Strasbourg. Fasc. 2–4, Nos. 25–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevrolat, L.A.A. 1835. Coléoptères du Mexique. Silbermann, Strasbourg. Fasc. 5–8, Nos. 101–200.Google Scholar
Chevrolat, L.A.A. 1863. Coléoptères de l'Ile de Cuba. (Suite). Notes, synonymies et descriptions d'espèces nouvelles. Familles des cicindélètes, carabiques, dytiscides, gyrinides et palpicomes. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (4e Série) 3: 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, H.-F. 1945. The larvae of the Harpalinae unisetosae (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Entomologica Americana 25: 1–71.Google Scholar
Csiki, E. 1929. Carabidae: Harpalinae III (Pars 104). pp. 347–527in Junk, W., and Schenkling, S. (Eds.), Coleopterorum catalogus. Junk, Berlin.Google Scholar
Csiki, E. 1931. Carabidae: Harpalinae V (Pars 115). pp. 739–1022in Junk, W., and Schenkling, S. (Eds.), Coleopterorum catalogus. Junk, Berlin.Google Scholar
Csiki, E. 1946. Die Käferfauna des Karpaten-Beckens. I. Band. Allgemeiner Teil und Caraboidea. Budapest. 798 pp.Google Scholar
Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1934. New West Indian Carabidae, with a list of the Cuban species. Psyche 41: 66–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1935. West Indian Carabidae II.: Itinerary of 1934; forests of Haiti; new species; and a new key to Colpodes. Psyche 42: 167–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1937. West Indian Carabidae III: New species and records from Cuba, with a brief discussion of the mountain fauna. Memorias de la Sociedad Cubana de Historia Natural 11: 115–136.Google Scholar
Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1947. West Indian Carabidae (Col.). VII. The species of the Cayman Islands. The Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 83: 209–211.Google Scholar
Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1953. West Indian Carabidae (Coleoptera). The Bahama Species. American Museum Novitates 1650: 16 pp.Google Scholar
Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1968. The carabid beetles of New Guinea Part III. Harpalinae (continued): Perigonini to Pseudomorphini. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 137: 1–253.Google Scholar
Dejean, P.F.M.A. 1826. Species général des Coléoptères, de la collection de M. le Comte Dejean. Tome second. Crevot, Paris. viii + 501 pp.Google Scholar
Dejean, P.F.M.A. 1831. Species général des Coléoptères, de la collection de M. le Comte Dejean. Tome cinquième. Méquignon-Marvis, Paris. viii + 883 pp.Google Scholar
Downie, N.M., and Arnett, R.H. Jr., 1994. The beetles of northeastern North America. Volume I: Introduction; suborders Archostemata and Adephaga. The Sandhill Crane Press, Gainesville, FL. 272 pp.Google Scholar
Emden, F.I. van. 1942. A key to the genera of larval Carabidae (Col.). The Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 92: 1–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emden, F.I. van. 1949. New and little-known Neotropical Carabidae. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History (12th Series) 2: 861–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erichson, G.F. 1847. Conspectus insectorum coleopterorum quae in Republica Peruana observata sunt. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 13: 67–185.Google Scholar
Erwin, T.L. 1974. The Genus Coptocarpus Chaudoir of the Australian Region with Notes on Related African Species (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Oodini). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 184: 25 pp.Google Scholar
Erwin, T.L. 1991. The Ground-beetles of Central America (Carabidae), Part II: Notiophilini, Loricerini, and Carabini. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 501: 30 pp.Google Scholar
Erwin, T.L., and Sims, L.L.. 1984. Carabid beetles of the West Indies (Insects: Coleoptera): A synopsis of the genera and checklists of tribes of Caraboidea, and of the West Indian species. Quaestiones Entomologicae 20: 351–466.Google Scholar
Everts, E.J.G. 1898. Coleoptera Neerlandica. De schildvleugelige Insecten van Nederland en het aangrenzend gebied. Vol. 1, pt. 1. Nijhoff, 'sGravenhage. pp. 1–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1792. Entomologia systematica emendata et aucta, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species adjectis synonimis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus. Tom. I. Pars I. Proft, Hafniae. xx + 330 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fattig, P.W. 1949. The Carabidae or Ground Beetles of Georgia. Emory University Museum Bulletin 7: 62 pp.Google Scholar
Freude, H. 1976. 1. Familie: Carabidae (Laufkäfer). In Freude, H., Harde, K.W., and Lohse, G.A. (Eds.), Die Käfer mitteleuropas. Band 2. Adephaga 1. Goecke & Evers, Krefeld. 302 pp.Google Scholar
Ganglbauer, L. 1892. Die Käfer von Mitteleuropa. Die Käfer der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, Deutschlands, der Schweiz, sowie des französischen und italienischen Alpengebietes. Erster Band. Familienreihe Caraboidea. Gerold, Wien. iii + 557 pp.Google Scholar
Haberman, H. 1968. Eesti Jooksiklased (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Kirjastus Valgus, Tallinn. 598 pp.Google Scholar
Habu, A. 1956. On the genera and species of the Oodini (Coleoptera, Carabidae) from Japan. The Bulletin of the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences (Series C) 6: 75–101.Google Scholar
Habu, A. 1958. Additional notes on the study of the Oodini from Japan (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Kontyû 26: 191–194.Google Scholar
Habu, A., and Sadanaga, K.. 1963. Illustrations for identification of larvae of the Carabidae found in cultivated fields and paddy-fields (II). The Bulletin of the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Series C 16: 151–179. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Habu, A., and Sadanaga, K.. 1971. Descriptions of some larvae of the Carabidae found in cultivated fields and paddy-fields (III). Kontyû 39: 159–166. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Hansen, V. 1941. Biller XI. Sandspringere og Løbebiller (Cicindelidae og Carabidae). Danmarks Fauna 47. Gads Forlag, København. 380 pp.Google Scholar
Hansen, V. 1968. Biller XXIV. Sandspringere og Løbebiller (Cicindelidae og Carabidae). Danmarks Fauna 47. Gads Forlag, København. 451 pp.Google Scholar
Horn, G.H. 1870. On the species of Oodes and allied genera of the United States. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 3: 105–109.Google Scholar
Horn, G.H. 1881. Synoptic table of the tribe Chlaeniini. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 4: 29–30.Google Scholar
Horn, G.H. 1891. New species and miscellaneous notes. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 18: 32–47.Google Scholar
Hůrka, K. 1978. 5. Bestimmungstabellen. 5.2. Carabidae. pp. 51–69 in Klausnitzer, B. (Ed.), Ordnung Coleoptera (Larven). Junk, The Hague. 378 pp.Google Scholar
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature [ICZN]. 1985. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Third edition adopted by the XX general assembly of the International Union of Biological Sciences. London. xx + 338 pp. [In French and English.]Google Scholar
Jacquelin du Val, P.N.C. 1857. Ordre des Coléoptères, Lin. pp. 1–328 in de la Sagra, R., Histoire physique, politique et naturelle de l'Ile de Cuba. Seconde partie: histoire naturelle. Vol. 7. Bertrand, Paris. lxxxvii + 868 pp. (+ 20 pls.).Google Scholar
Jakobson, G.G. 1906. Zhuki Rossii i zapadnoi Evropy. Vyp. IV. Devrien, St.-Petersburg. pp. 241–320.Google Scholar
Jeannel, R. 1942. Coléoptères carabiques. Deuxième partie. Faune de France 40. Librairie de la Faculté des Sciences, Paris. pp. 573–1173.Google Scholar
Jeannel, R. 1948. Coléoptères Carabiques de la région Malgache (deuxième partie). Faune de l'Empire Français, X. Office de la Recherche scientifique coloniale, Paris. pp. 373–765.Google Scholar
Jeannel, R. 1949. Coléoptères Carabiques de la région Malgache (troisième partie). Faune de l'Empire Français, XI. Office de la Recherche scientifique coloniale, Paris. pp. 767–1146.Google Scholar
Kryzhanovskij, O.L. 1976. An attempt at a revised classification of the family Carabidae (Coleoptera). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 55: 80–91. [In Russian.] [English translation in Entomological Review 55(1): 56–64.]Google Scholar
Kryzhanovskij, O.L. 1983. Coleoptera. Vol. 1, part 2. Beetles of the suborder Adephaga: Families Rhysodidae and Trachypachidae, family Carabidae (introductory part and review of USSR fauna). Nauka, Leningrad. 341 pp. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Kuhnt, P. 1913. Illustrierte Bestimmungs-Tabellen der Käfer Deutschlands. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart. x + 1138 pp.Google Scholar
Lacordaire, T. 1854. Histoire naturelle des Insectes. Genera des Coléoptères ou exposé méthodique et critique de tous les genres proposés jusqu'ici dans cet ordre d'insectes. Tome premier contenant les familles des cicindélètes, carabiques, dytiscides, gyrinides et palpicornes. Roret, Paris. 486 pp.Google Scholar
LaFerté-Sénectère, F. de 1851. Révision de la tribu des patellimanes de Dejean, Coléoptères pentamères de la famille des carabiques. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (2e série) 9: 209–294.Google Scholar
Laporte, F.L. de [comte de Castelnau]. 1832. Mémoire sur cinquante espèces nouvelles ou peu connues d'insectes. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 1: 386–415.Google Scholar
Laporte, F.L. de 1834. Etudes entomologiques, ou description d'insectes nouveaux; et observations sur leur synonymie. Méquignon-Marvis, Paris. pp. 1–94 (+ pls. 1–2).Google Scholar
Larsson, S.G. 1939. Entwicklungstypen und Entwicklungszeiten der dänischen Carabiden. Entomologiske Meddelelser 20: 277–560.Google Scholar
Larsson, S.G. 1941. Larver. pp. 243–360 in Hansen, V., Biller, XI. Sandspringere og Løbebiller (Cicindelidae og Carabidae). Danmarks Fauna 47. Gads Forlag, København. 380 pp.Google Scholar
Larsson, S.G. 1968. Løbebillemes Larver. pp. 282–433 in Hansen, V., Biller, XXIV. Sandspringere og Løbebiller (Cicindelidae og Carabidae). Danmarks Fauna 76. Gads Forlag, København. 451 pp.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1844. Descriptions of new species of North American Coleoptera. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 2 (1844–45): 48–53.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1848. A descriptive catalogue of the geodephagous Coleoptera inhabiting the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New York 4: 173–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1851. Descriptions of new species of Coleoptera, from California. Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New York 5: 125–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1853. Notes on the classification of the Carabidae of the United States. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (Series 2) 10: 363–403.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1861. Classification of the Coleoptera of North America. Prepared for the Smithsonian Institution. Part I. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 136: xxiv + 214 pp.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1863 a. List of the Coleoptera of North America. Prepared for the Smithsonian Institution. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 140: 49 pp.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1863 b. New species of North American Coleoptera. Prepared for the Smithsonian Institution. Part I. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 167: 86 pp.Google Scholar
Lecordier, C., and Girard, C.. 1987. Les Oodinae du Cameroun I. Les genres Microodes Jeannel et Protopidius Basilewsky [Coleoptera, Carabidae]. Revue Française d'Entomologie (nouvelle série) 9: 167–171.Google Scholar
Lecordier, C., and Girard, C.. 1988. Les Oodinae du Cameroun II. Les genres Sphaerodes, Pseudosphaerodes, Systolocranius, Acanthoodes, Lobatodes, Acutosternus n.gen. et Lonchosternus [Coleoptera, Carabidae]. Revue Française d'Entomologie (nouvelle série) 10: 289–296.Google Scholar
Lecordier, C., and Girard, C.. 1990. Les Oodinae du Cameroun. III. Les genres Brachyodes Jeannel et Oodes Bonelli [Coleoptera, Carabidae]. Revue Française d'Entomologie (nouvelle série) 12: 1–12.Google Scholar
Leng, C.W. 1920. Catalogue of the Coleoptera of America, north of Mexico. Sherman, Mount Vernon, NY. x + 470 pp.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1943. Oodes gracilis Villa. Eine thermophile Carabide Schwedens. Notulae Entomologicae 22: 109–157.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1945. Die Fennoskandischen Carabidae. Eine tiergeographische Studie. I. Spezieller Teil. Göteborgs Kungliga Vetenskaps- och Vitterhets-Samhälles Handlingar, Sjätte Följden, Series B 4 (1): 1–709. [English translation published by the Smithsonian Institution Libraries.]Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1955. Dejean's types of North American Carabidae (Col.). Opuscula Entomologica 20: 10–34.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1957. The americanus group of Oodes (Carabidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin 10 (1956): 63–66.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1969. The ground-beetles (Carabidae, excl. Cicindelinae) of Canada and Alaska. Part 6. Opuscula Entomologia Supplementum 34: 945–1192.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1974. On the elytral microsculpture of carabid beetles (Col. Carabidae). Entomologica Scandinavica 5: 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1986. The Carabidae (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica, Vol. 15, part 2. Brill, Leiden. pp. 233–497.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H., and Freitag, R.. 1969. North American ground-beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae, excluding Cicindelinae) described by Thomas Say: Designation of lectotypes and neotypes. Psyche 76: 326–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löding, H.P. 1945. Catalogue of the Beetles of Alabama. Geological Survey of Alabama, Monograph 11: 172 pp.Google Scholar
Luff, M.L. 1980. The larvae of the British Carabidae (Coleoptera) VI. Licinini, Panagaeini, Chlaeniini and Oodini. Entomologists Gazette 31: 177–194.Google Scholar
Luff, M.L. 1993. The Carabidae (Coleoptera) larvae of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica, Vol. 27. Brill, Leiden. 186 pp.Google Scholar
MacLeay, W.J. 1888. The insects of King's Sound and its vicinity. The Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales (2) 3: 443–480.Google Scholar
Motschulsky, T.V. de. 1864. Enumeration des nouvelles espèces de Coléoptères rapportés de ses voyages. 4-ème article (suite). Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 37: 171–240, 297–355.Google Scholar
Nietner, J. 1856. Entomological papers—being descriptions of new Ceylon Coleoptera, with such observations on their habits as appear any way interesting. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 25: 523–554.Google Scholar
Noonan, G.R. 1973. The anisodactylines (Insecta: Coleoptera: Carabidae: Harpalini): Classification, evolution, and zoogeography. Quaestiones Entomologicae 9: 266–480.Google Scholar
Panzer, G.W.F. 1813. Index Entomologicus, sistens omnes Insectorum species in G.W.F. Panzeri Fauna Insectorum Germanica descriptas atque delineatas secundum methodum Fabricianam: adjectis emendationibus, observationibus. Part 1. Eleutherata. Felssecker, Norimbergae. viii + 216 pp.Google Scholar
Péringuey, L. 1896. Descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera of South Africa. Part II. Cicindelidae supplement. Carabidae. West, Newman & Co., London. pp. 99–623 (+ 10 pls.).Google Scholar
Perty, J.A.M. 1830. Delectus animalium articulatorum, quae in itinere per Brasiliam annis MDCCCXVII-MDCCCXX jussu et auspiciis Maximiliani Josephi I. Bavariae regis augistissimi peracto collegerunt Dr. J.B. de Spix et Dr. C.F.Ph. de Martius. Delectus Animalium articulatorum in Brasilia collectorum. [Fasc. I]. Monachii, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar
Portevin, G. 1929. Histoire naturelle des Coléoptères de France. Tome I. Adephaga. -Polyphaga: Staphylinidea. Lechevalier, Paris. 649 pp. + 5 pls.Google Scholar
Reichardt, H. 1977. A synopsis of the genera of Neotropical Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). Quaestiones Entomologicae 13: 346–493.Google Scholar
Reitter, L. 1908. Fauna Germanica. Die Käfer des deutschen Reiches. Nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet. Band 1. Lutz Verlag, Stuttgart. viii + 248 pp. (+ 40 pls.).Google Scholar
Say, T.L. 1830. Description of new species of North American insects, and observations on some of the species already described. The Disseminator 1 (1): [3]; (3) [3]; (4) [3]; (5) [3]; (6) [3]; (7) [3].Google Scholar
Schönherr, C.J. 1825. Tabulae synopticae familiae Curculionidum. Isis 1825: 581–588.Google Scholar
Sharova, I.K. 1958. The larvae of Carabidae beneficial and noxious to agriculture. Uchenye Zapiski Moskovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogicheskogo Instituta Imeni Lenina 124 (7): 4–165. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Sloane, T.G. 1900. Studies in Australian entomology. No. IX. New species of Carabidae (with notes on some previously described species, and synoptic lists of species). The Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 24 (1899): 553–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloane, T.G. 1910. Revisional notes on Australian Carabidae. Part iii. Tribes Oodini, Chlaeniini, and Sphodrini [Coleoptera]. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 35: 435–480.Google Scholar
Sloane, T.G. 1923. Supplementary note to the classification of the Carabidae. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1923: 250a–250c.Google Scholar
Spence, J.R. 1983. Taxonomic status, relationships, and biogeography of Anatrichis LeConte and Oodinus Motschulsky (Carabidae: Oodini). The Coleopterists Bulletin 36 (1982): 567–580.Google Scholar
Stephens, J.F. 1826. General zoology, or systematic natural history by G. Shaw. Vol. XIV. Pt. 1. London. (41 pls.) [Not seen.]Google Scholar
Stephens, J.F. 1828. Illustrations of British entomology; or, a synopsis of indigenous insects: Containing their generic and specific distinctions; with an account of their metamorphoses, times of appearance, localities, food, and economy, as far as practicable. Mandibulata. Vol. I. Baldwin & Cradock, London. pp. 77–186 (pls. 5–9).Google Scholar
Stork, N.E. 1980. A scanning electron microscope study of tarsal adhesive setae in the Coleoptera. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 68: 173–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, S.V. 1874. Notes on the species of Oodii of Louisiana. The Canadian Entomologist 6: 135–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R.G. 1979. Larvae of North American Carabidae with a key to the tribes. pp. 209–291 in Erwin, T.L., Ball, G.E., Whitehead, D.R., and Halpem, A.L. (Eds.), Carabid Beetles: Their Evolution, Natural History, and Classification. Junk, The Hague. 635 pp.Google Scholar