Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-nxk7g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-14T13:07:21.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spray Chamber Insecticide Tests on the Larch Sawfly (Pristiphora erichsonii (Htg.))

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. T. Drooz
A. T. Drooz
Affiliation:
Lake States Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Experimental aerial spraying by Butcher (3), Butcher and Eaton (4) and Peterson (7) has been described; but potency tests of the synthetic organic insecticides against the larch sawfly, Pristiphora erichsonii (Htg.), have not been reported.

The first screening tests were carried out in 1955 at Cass Lake, Minn., with DDT, chlordane, methoxychlor, benzene hexachloride (BHC) and malathion against larvae of each of the five different instars. High temperatures in the field laboratory killed an inordinately large proportion of the control insects, making interpretation of the test data hazardous. Examination of the data indicated that BHC and malathion were the only promising toxicants. Work was continued by the author at Cass Lake in 1956 with these insecticides as well as with DDT, which has been used frequently against forest defoliators.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 89 , Issue 4 , April 1957 , pp. 183 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1)Abbott, W. S. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Jour. Econ. Ent. 18: 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Bliss, C. I. 1935. The calculation of the dosage-mortality curve. Annals of Applied Biol. 22(1): 134–167. Illus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Butcher, J. W. 1953. Preliminary field evaluations of Endrin and Dieldrin for control of the larch sawfly. School of Forestry, Univ. of Minn., Minn. Forestry Notes 17, 2 pp. (Processed.)Google Scholar
(4)Butcher, J. W., and Eaton, C. B.. 1952. The larch sawfly epidemic in the Lake States. U.S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Ent. and Plant Quar. E.-841, 8 pp. (Processed.)Google Scholar
(5)Eaton, C. B., and Secrest, J. P.. 1951. A laboratory spray chamber for producing deposits of limited drop size. U.S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Ent. and Plant Quar. ET-293, 6 pp. (Processed.)Google Scholar
(6)Finney, D. J. 1952. Probit analysis, a statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve. 2nd ed., 318 pp. Illus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
(7)Peterson, L. O. T. 1955. Retarding larch sawfly damage in larch plantations. Canada Dept. Agr. Sci. Serv., For. Biol. Div., Bi-Monthly Progress Report 11(6): 2.Google Scholar