Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:53:41.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESPONSE BY THE STRIPED AMBROSIA BEETLE, TRYPODENDRON LINEATUM (OLIVIER), TO THE BARK BEETLE PHEROMONE, FRONTALIN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R.R. Setter  and
J.H. Borden
R.R. Setter
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
J.H. Borden
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Semiochemical-mediated behavior of the striped ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), has received extensive study. In selecting and mass-attacking hosts in nature, it utilizes a blend of volatiles, including the aggregation pheromone, lineatin, and the host kairomones α-pinene and ethanol (MacConnell et al. 1977; Vité and Bakke 1979; Borden et al. 1982; Bakke 1983; Lindgren et al. 1983). In single cell recordings of European T. lineatum olfactory cells, Tømmerås and Mustaparta (1989) reported no response to pheromones of other scolytid species. However, Benz et al. (1986) reported some response in the field by European T. lineatum to a blend of synthetic Ips typographus (L.) pheromones, although a single attractant was not identified. We report that frontalin, a pheromone utilized by numerous Dendroctonus spp., is an attractive kairomone for T. lineatum in western North America.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 124 , Issue 3 , June 1992 , pp. 559 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakke, A. 1983. Dosage response of the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) to semiochemicals. Zeitschrift für angewandte Entomologie 95: 158–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, G., Bovey, P., and Junod, P.. 1986. On the specific attraction of the males of the six-toothed spruce bark beetle, Pityogenes chalcographus (L.) to a mixture of synthetic pheromones of the eight-toothed spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). Experientia 42: 325–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J.H., King, C.J., Lindgren, B.S., Chong, L., Gray, D.R., Oehlschlager, A.C., Slessor, K.N., and Pierce, H.D. Jr, 1982. Variation in response of the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum from two continents to semiochemicals and trap form. Environmental Entomology 11: 403–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daterman, G.E., Rudinsky, J.A., and Nagel, W.P.. 1965. Flight patterns of bark and timber beetles associated with coniferous forests of western Oregon. Oregon State University Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 87.Google Scholar
Gries, G., Pierce, H.D. JrLindgren, B.S., and Borden, J.H.. 1988. New techniques for capturing and analyzing semiochemicals for scolytid beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 81: 1715–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, B.S., Borden, J.H., Chong, L., Friskie, L.M., and Orr, D.B.. 1983. Factors influencing the efficiency of pheromone-baited traps for three species of ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). The Canadian Entomologist 115: 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacConnell, J.G., Borden, J.H., Silverstein, R.M., and Stokkink, E.. 1977. Isolation and tentative identification of lineatin, a pheromone from the frass of Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 3: 549–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, J.L., Pierce, H.D. Jr , Borden, J.H., and Butterfield, A.. 1988. Sites of production and occurrence of volatiles in Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins. Journal of Chemical Ecology 14: 1305–1317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nijholt, W.W. 1973. Turpentine oil delays ambrosia beetle attacks. Environment Canada Forestry Service Bi-monthly Research Notes 29(6): 36.Google Scholar
Pitman, G.B., and Vité, J.P.. 1970. Field response of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to synthetic frontalin. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 63: 661–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudinsky, J.A., and Daterman, G.E.. 1964. Field studies on flight patterns and olfactory responses of ambrosia beetles in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon. The Canadian Entomologist 96: 1339–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1985. SAS Users Guide, Version 5 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 957 pp.Google Scholar
Tømmerås, B.Å., and Mustaparta, H.. 1989. Single cell responses to pheromones, host, and non-host volatiles in the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 52: 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderwel, D.C., and Oehlschlager, A.C.. 1987. Biosynthesis of pheromones and endocrine regulation of pheromone production in Coleoptera. pp. 175–215 in Prestwick, G.D., and Blomquist, G.J. (Eds.), Pheromone Biochemistry. Academic Press, New York, NY. 565 pp.Google Scholar
Vité, J.P., and Bakke, A.. 1979. Synergism between chemical and physical stimuli in host colonization by an ambrosia beetle. Naturwissenschaften 66: 528–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar