Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T05:54:22.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Olfactory activity of ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate on adult oriental fruit moths

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Fabio Molinari*
Affiliation:
Istituto di Entomologia e Patologia vegetale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, via Emilia Parmense 84, I-29122 Piacenza, Italy
Gianfranco Anfora
Affiliation:
Research and Innovation Centre, Istituto Agrario di San Michele all'Adige, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via Edmund Mach 1, I-38010, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy
Silvia Schmidt
Affiliation:
Research and Innovation Centre, Istituto Agrario di San Michele all'Adige, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via Edmund Mach 1, I-38010, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy
Michela Villa
Affiliation:
Istituto di Entomologia e Patologia vegetale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, via Emilia Parmense 84, I-29122 Piacenza, Italy, and Research and Innovation Centre, Istituto Agrario di San Michele all'Adige, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via Edmund Mach 1, I-38010, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy
Claudio Ioriatti
Affiliation:
Research and Innovation Centre, Istituto Agrario di San Michele all'Adige, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via Edmund Mach 1, I-38010, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy
Edison Pasqualini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agroambientali, Università di Bologna, Viale Giuseppe Fanin 42, I-40137 Bologna, Italy
Antonio De Cristofaro
Affiliation:
Department of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Molise, Via De Sanctis, I-86100, Campobasso, Italy
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: fabio.molinari@unicatt.it).

Abstract

We investigated whether or not pear ester (ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate) attracted adult oriental fruit moths, Cydia molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The electroantennographic responses of C. molesta to pear ester were recorded and dose–response curves calculated. In laboratory bioassays, the attractiveness of different dosages was assessed in a dual-choice olfactometric arena. The responses of virgin males and females to pear ester in the presence and absence of pear (Pyrus communis L.), peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.), and apple (Malus ×domestica Borkh.) (Rosaceae) shoots were evaluated. Electroantennographic recordings demonstrated that both male and female C. molesta were able to detect the pear ester. In our bioassay, however, pear ester readily attracted males but attracted very few females. The response of males was dose-dependent and they preferred pear ester over apple- and pear-shoot volatiles, whereas no apparent preference between pear ester and peach-shoot volatiles was observed. Therefore, this kairomonal compound could be more effective in attracting C. molesta when applied in orchards of secondary host plants, like apple or pear, than in peach orchards.

Résumé

Des essais ont été effectués pour étudier l'effet attractif de l'ester de poire, éthyle (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate, sur les adultes de Cydia molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Les réponses électroantennographiques de C. molesta à l'ester de poire ont été enregistrées et les courbes de dose–réponse ont été calculés. L'attraction aux différentes doses a été évaluée grâce à des essais au laboratoire sous forme de tests de choix dans un olfactomètre à deux choix. La réponse des mâles et des femelles vierges à l'ester de poire a été évaluée en présence et en absence des rameaux de poire (Pyrus communis L.), pêche (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.) et pomme (Malus ×domestica Borkh.) (Rosaceae). Les enregistrements électroantennographiques ont démontré que les mâles et les femelles de C. molesta sont capables de détecter l'ester de poire. Dans notre test de choix l'ester de poire a attiré les mâles alors que les femelles étaient moins sensibles. La réponse des mâles est dépendante de la dose. Les mâles ont montré une préférence pour l'ester de poire, comparativement à la pomme et aux volatiles des rameaux de poire, alors qu'aucune préférence n'a été observée lorsque l'ester de poire était en concurrence avec les volatiles des rameaux de pêche. Par conséquent, ce composé kairomonal pourrait être plus efficace pour attirer la tordeuse orientale lorsqu'il est appliqué dans les vergers de plantes-hôtes secondaires, comme la pomme et la poire, plutôt que dans le verger de pêches.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anfora, G., Baldessari, M., Maines, R., Trona, F., Reggiori, F., and Angeli, G. 2007. Control of Cydia pomonella L. and Cydia molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera Tortricidae) in pome-fruit orchards with Ecodian sex pheromone dispensers. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, 72: 535541. PMID:18399485.Google ScholarPubMed
Anfora, G., Tasin, M., De Cristofaro, A., Ioriatti, C., and Lucchi, A. 2009. Synthetic grape volatiles attract mated Lobesia botrana females in laboratory and filed bioassays. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 35: 10541062. PMID:19779942 doi:10.1007/s10886-009-9686-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angeli, G., Berti, M., Maines, R., and Ioriatti, C. 2003. Utilizzo delle tecniche di disorientamento e “attract and kill” nella difesa del melo da Cydia pomonella (L.) e Cydia molesta (Busck). Informatore Fitopatologico, 53: 4550.Google Scholar
Bradlwarter, M., Oesterreich, J., Weis, H., Rass, W., and Greismair, W. 1999. Pfirsichwickler zeigen verändertes Verhalten. Obstbau Weinbau, 12: 355358.Google Scholar
CAB International, 2004. Crop protection compendium. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Cardé, R.T., Baker, T.C., and Castrovillo, P.J. 1977. Disruption of sexual communication in Laspeyresia pomonella (codling moth), Grapholitha molesta (oriental fruit moth) and G. prunivora (lesser appleworm) with hollow fiber attractant sources. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 22: 280288. doi:10.1007/BF00302866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosse, A.A., and Baker, T.C. 1999. Electrophysiologically and behaviorally active volatiles of buffalo gourd root powder for corn rootworm beetles. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25: 5166. doi:10.1023/A:1020885032397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, P.D., Raina, R., Prasad, A.R., and Sen, A. 2007. Electroantennogram responses of the potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelichiidae) to plant volatiles. Journal of Biosciences, 32: 339349. PMID:17435325 doi:10.1007/s12038-007-0033-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Cristofaro, A., Ioriatti, C., Pasqualini, E., Anfora, G., Germinara, G.S., Villa, M., and Rotundo, G. 2004. Electrophysiological responses of Cydia pomonella (L.) to codlemone and pear ester ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate: peripheral interactions in their perception and evidences for cells responding to both compounds. Bulletin of Insectology, 57: 137144.Google Scholar
Den Otter, C.J., Tchicaya, T., and Van den Berg, M.J. 1988. Olfactory sensitivity of five species of tsetse flies (Glossina spp.) to 1-octen-3-ol, 4-heptanone, 3-nonanone and acetone. Insect Science and its Application, 9: 213218.Google Scholar
Den Otter, C.J., Tchicaya, T., and Schutte, A.M. 1991. Effects of age, sex and hunger on the antennal olfactory sensitivity of tsetse flies. Physiological Entomology, 16: 173182. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1991.tb00554.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickel, E.R., and Ducroquet, J.P.H.J. 1998. Monitoring and control of Grapholita molesta in Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe. Agropequaria Catarinense, 11: 811.Google Scholar
Il'ichev, A.L., Williams, D.G., and Milner, A.D. 2004. Mating disruption barriers in pome fruit for improved control of oriental fruit moth Grapholita molesta Busck (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in stone fruit under mating disruption. Journal of Applied Entomology, 128: 126132. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.2004.00822.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioriatti, C., Anfora, G., Angeli, G., Civolani, S., Schmidt, S., and Pasqualini, E. 2009. Toxicity of emamectin benzoate to Cydia pomonella (L.) and Cydia molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): laboratory and field tests. Pest Management Science, 65: 306312. PMID:19097022 doi:10.1002/ps.1689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, A.L., and Light, D.M. 2001. Attractants from ‘Bartlett’ pear for codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) larvae. Naturwissenschaften, 88: 339342. PMID:11572015 doi:10.1007/s001140100244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, A.L., and Light, D.M. 2004. Use of ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate in codling moth management: kairomone species specificity. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 101: 6167.Google Scholar
Knudsen, G.K., Bengtsson, M., Kobro, S., Jaastad, G., Hofsvang, T., and Witzgall, P. 2008. Discrepancy in laboratory and field attraction of apple fruit moth Argyresthia conjugella to host plant volatiles. Physiological Entomology, 33: 16. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.2007.00592.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovanci, O.B., Walgenbach, J.F., and Kennedy, G.G. 2004. Evaluation of extended-season mating disruption of the oriental fruit moth Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lep., Tortricidae) in apples. Journal of Applied Entomology, 128: 664669. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.2004.00906.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, D.M., Knight, A.L., Henrick, C.A., Rajapaska, D., Lingren, B., Dickens, , et al. 2001. A pear-derived kairomone with pheromonal potency that attracts male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) Naturwissenschaften, 88: 333338. PMID: 11572014 doi:10.1007/s001140100243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molinari, F., and Cravedi, P. 1990. Il metodo della confusione sessuale nella difesa contro Cydia molesta (Busck) e Anarsia lineatella Zell. Informatore Fitopatologico, 40: 3136.Google Scholar
Natale, D., Mattiacci, L., Pasqualini, E., and Dorn, S. 2003. Response of female Cydia molesta (Lepidoptera Tortricidae) to plant derived volatiles. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 93: 335342. PMID: 12908919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natale, D., Mattiacci, L., Hern, A., Pasqualini, E., and Dorn, S. 2004 a. Bioassay approaches to observing behavioural responses of adult female Cydia molesta to host plant odour. Journal of Applied Entomology, 128: 182187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natale, D., Mattiacci, L., Pasqualini, E., and Dorn, S. 2004 b. Apple and peach fruit volatiles and the apple constituent butyl hexanoate attract female oriental fruit moth, Cydia molesta, in the laboratory. Journal of Applied Entomology, 128: 2227. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0418.2003.00802.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piñero, J.C., and Dorn, S. 2007. Synergism between aromatic compounds and green leaf volatiles derived from the host plant underlies female attraction in the oriental fruit moth. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 125: 185194. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2007.00614.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popovich, V.V. 1982. The oriental fruit moth in the Krasnodar region. Zashchita Rastenii, 11: 4041.Google Scholar
Reis, F.W., Nora, I., and Melzer, R. 1988. Population dynamics of Grapholita molesta, Busck, 1916, and its adaptation on apple in south Brazil. Acta Horticulturae, 232: 204208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, G.H.L., and Vickers, R.A. 1991. Biology, ecology and control of the oriental fruit moth. In World crop pests. Vol. 5. Tortricid pests: their biology, natural enemies and control. Edited by Geest, L.P.S. Van Der and Evenhius, H.H.. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 389412.Google Scholar
Rumbo, E.R., and Vickers, R.A. 1997. Prolonged adaptation as possible mating disruption mechanisms in oriental fruit moth, Cydia (= Grapholita) molesta. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 23: 445457. doi:10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006370.64127.49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, S., Anfora, G., Ioriatti, C., Germinara, G.S., Rotundo, G., and De Cristofaro, A. 2007. Biological activity of ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate on different tortricid species: electrophysiological responses and field tests. Environmental Entomology, 36: 10251031. PMID:18284724 doi:10.1603/0046-225X(2007)36[1025:BAOEEO]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tòth, M., Pénzes, B., Vuity, Z., Hàri, K., and Koczor, S. 2009. Testing pear ester-based lures in Hungary II. Cydia pyrivora and Hedya nubiferana (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). In Semio-chemicals without Borders: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the Pheromone Groups of the West and East Palearctic Regional Sections of the International Organisation for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, Budapest, Hungary, 15–20 November 2009, p. 99.Google Scholar
Valeur, P.G., and Löfstedt, C. 1996. Behaviour of male oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta, in overlapping sex pheromone plumes in a wind tunnel. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 79: 5159. doi:10.1007/BF00333821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, M.A., and Baker, T.C. 1994. Behaviour of flying oriental fruit moth males during approach to sex pheromone sources. Physiological Entomology, 19: 6169. doi:10.1111/j.1365-032.1994.tb01075.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Z.R., Wang, Y.G., and Yan, G.Y. 1989. A preliminary report on the oriental fruit moth in north Jiansgu. Insect Knowledge, 26: 1719.Google Scholar