Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:25:29.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New record of Chrysomya rufifacies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in Canada: predicted range expansion and potential effects on native species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

J.Y. Rosati  and
S.L. VanLaerhoven
J.Y. Rosati*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, Canada N9B 3P4
S.L. VanLaerhoven
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, Canada N9B 3P4
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: rosati1@uwindsor.ca).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is the first report of the hairy maggot blow fly, Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart), in Canada since its arrival in the continental United States of America in 1982. Specimens were collected from one swine (Sus scrofa L.) carcass in fall 2004 and again from six swine carcasses at three rural sites within the Windsor/Essex County region of southwestern Ontario in fall 2005. Based upon the biological characteristics of the species and the absence of specimens from spring and summer carrion-insect collections, it is suggested that C. rufifacies is present in southwestern Ontario during the fall season, after range expansion from the midcontinental United States of America during the spring and summer months. However, considering the projected increases in temperature due to global warming, establishment of C. rufifacies is predicted to extend well into southern Ontario and Quebec. Current and predicted distributions based upon the biological temperature requirements of C. rufifacies are depicted through geographic range maps. The potential economic and ecological impacts are discussed, with emphasis upon negative interactions between C. rufifacies and several native blow fly species, particularly Cochliomyia macellaria (Fabr.).

Résumé

Nous signalons pour la première fois la présence de la mouche de la viande à asticot velu, Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart), au Canada, depuis son arrivée dans la partie continentale des États-Unis en 1982. Nos spécimens proviennent d'une carcasse de porc, Sus scrofa L., à l'automne 2004 et de six carcasses de porc à l'automne 2005 dans trois sites ruraux de la région du comté de Windsor-Essex dans le sud-ouest de l'Ontario. D'après les caractéristiques biologiques de l'espèce et l'absence de spécimens dans les collections d'insectes sur les charognes au printemps et à l'été, nous croyons que C. rufifacies est présent dans le sud-ouest de l'Ontario en automne après avoir augmenté son aire de réparition durant les mois de printemps et d'été à partir des régions centrales du continent aux États-Unis. Cependant, en tenant compte des augmentations prévues de température causées par les effets du réchauffement global, nous prédisons que C. rufifacies étendra son aire de répartition considérablement dans le sud de l'Ontario et du Québec. Nous présentons des cartes géographiques des répartitions actuelles et projetées de C. rufifacies d'après ses besoins biologiques de température. Nous discutons des impacts potentiels, économiques et écologiques, surtout des interactions négatives de C. rufifacies avec plusieurs espèces indigènes de mouches de la viande, en particulier avec Cochliomyia macellaria (Fabr.).

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 139 , Issue 5 , October 2007 , pp. 670 - 677
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumgartner, D.L., 1986. The hairy maggot blowfly, Chrysomya ruffacies, confirmed in Arizona. Journal of the Entomological Society, 21: 130–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, D.L. 1993. Review of Chrysomya rufifacies (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 30: 338–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumgartner, D.L., and Greenberg, B. 1984. The genus Chrysomya (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in the New World. Journal of Medical Entomology, 21: 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, J.H., and Butler, J.F. 1997. Effects of temperature on Chrysomya rufifacies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) development. Journal of Medical Entomology, 34: 353–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrd, J.H., and Castner, J.L. 2001. Forensic entomology: the utility of arthropods in legal investigations. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
Canada Centre for Remote Sensing. 2005. Canadian provincial base map [online]. Available from http://www.geographynetwork.ca [accessed 21 January 2006].Google Scholar
Figarola, J.L.M., and Skoda, S.R. 1998. Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in Nebraska. Journal of the Entomological Society, 33: 319–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M.E. 1934. The insect inhabitants of carrion: a study in animal ecology. Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Bulletin No. 82.Google Scholar
Gagné, R.J., Gerrish, R.R., and Richard, R.D. 1982. Correspondence. Entomological Society of America Newsletter, 5(5): 9.Google Scholar
Goodbrod, J.R., and Goff, M.L. 1990. Effects of larval population density on rates of development and interactions between two species of Chrysomya (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in laboratory culture. Journal of Medical Entomology, 27: 338–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, B. 1990. Behaviour of postfeeding larvae of some Calliphoridae and a muscid (Diptera). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 83: 1210–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, G.H. 1981. Insects of Hawaii. Vol. 14. Diptera: Cyclorrhapha IV. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Hijmans, R.J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J.L., Jones, P.G., and Jarvis, A. 2005. The WorldClim interpolated global terrestrial climate surfaces. Version 1.4 [online]. Available from http://www.worldclim.org/ [accessed 4 December 2005].Google Scholar
Houghton, J.T., Griggs, D.J., Nouger, M., van der Linden, P.J., and Xiaosu, D. (Editors). 2001. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Illingworth, J.F. 1923. Insects attracted to carrion in Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaii Entomological Society, 5: 280–281.Google Scholar
Johnston, T.H., and Tiegs, O.W. 1922. Notes on the biology of some of the more common Queensland muscoid flies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland, 34: 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C.E. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17: 386–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, D.M. 1993. Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8: 133–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackerras, M.J. 1933. Observations on the life-histories, nutritional requirements and fecundity of blowflies. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 24: 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C.S., Carlton, C.E., and Meek, C.L. 1996. New distribution record of the hairy maggot blowfly Chrysomya rufifacies. Southwestern Entomologist, 21: 477–478.Google Scholar
McQuilland, P.B., Jones, A.L., and Williams, H. 1983. Recent studies on sheep blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in Tasmania. In Proceedings of Sheep Blowfly and Flystrike in Sheep: Second National Symposium, Kensington, Australia, 6 December 1983. Department of Agriculture, Sydney, Australia. pp. 100–105.Google Scholar
Meek, C.L., Puskarich-May, C., and Carlton, C.E. 1998. New state record for the hairy maggot blow fly Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart). Southwestern Entomologist, 23: 373–375.Google Scholar
Norris, K.R. 1959. The ecology of sheep blowflies in Australia. In Biogeography and ecology in Australia. Edited by Keast, A., Crocker, R.L., and Christian, C.S.. Monographiae Biologicae. 8: 514–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, K.R. 1965. The bionomics of blowflies. Annual Review of Entomology, 10: 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Flynn, M.A. 1983. The succession and rate of development of blowflies in carrion in southern Queensland and the application of these data to forensic entomology. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 22: 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, D.H. 1980. Partitioning of the carrion resource by sympatric Calliphoridae (Diptera) near Melbourne. Ph.D. thesis, LaTrobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
Richard, R.D., and Gerrish, R.R. 1983. The first confirmed field case of myiasis produced by Chrysomya sp. (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in the continental United States. Journal of Medical Entomology, 20: 685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shahid, S.A., Hall, R.D., Haskell, N.H., and Merritt, R.W. 2000. Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) established in the vicinity of Knoxville, Tennessee, USA. Journal of Forensic Science, 45: 896–897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Subramanian, H., and Mohan, K.R. 1980. Biology of the blowflies Chrysomyia megacephala, Chrysomyia rufifacies, and Lucilia cuprina. Kerala Journal of Veterinary Science, 11: 252–261.Google Scholar
Sukontason, K.L., Narongghal, P., Sripakdee, D., Boonchu, N., Chaiwong, T., Ngern-Klun, R., Piangjai, S., and Sukontason, K. 2005. First report of human myiasis caused by Chrysomya megacephala and Chrysomya rufifacies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in Thailand, and its implications in forensic entomology. Journal of Medical Entomology, 42: 702–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sukontason, K.L., Sukontason, K., Lertthamnongtham, S., Kuntalue, B., Thijuk, N., Vogtsberger, R.C., and Olson, J.K. 2003. Surface ultrastructure of Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) larvae (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 40: 259–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tillyard, R.J., and Seddon, H.R. 1933. The sheep blowfly problem in Australia. Report No. 1. Joint Blowfly Committee Pamphlet 37, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, and Scientific Bulletin 40, New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Tomberlin, J.K., Albert, A.M., Byrd, J.H., and Wall, D.W. 2006. Interdisciplinary workshop yields new entomological data for forensic sciences: Chrysomya rufifacies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) established in North Carolina. Journal of Medical Entomology, 43: 1287–1288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullerich, F.H. 1984. Analysis of sex determination in the monogenic blowfly Chrysomya rufifacies by pole cell transplantation. Molecular Genes and Genetics, 193: 479–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterhouse, D.F. 1947. The relative importance of live sheep and of carrion as breeding grounds for the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Australian (Melbourne) Commonwealth Council for Scientific and Industrial Research Bulletin 217.Google Scholar
Watson, E.J. 1997. Faunal succession of necrophilous insects associated with high-profile wildlife carcasses in Louisiana. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Entomology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.Google Scholar
Watson, E.J., and Carlton, C.E. 2005. Insect succession and decomposition of wildlife carcasses during fall and winter in Louisiana. Journal of Medical Entomology, 42: 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J.D. 1991. Chrysomya megacephala (Diptera: Calliphoridae) has reached the continental United States: review of its biology, pest status, and spread around the world. Journal of Medical Entomology, 28: 471–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, J.D. 1992. Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart): an introduced blow fly and its effect on the native Cochliomyia macellaria. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Chicago.Google Scholar
Wells, J.D., and Greenberg, B. 1992 a. Interaction between Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) on Cochliomyia macellaria (Fabr.) (Diptera: Calliphoridae): the possible consequences of an invasion. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 82: 133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J.D., and Greenberg, B. 1992 b. Laboratory interaction between introduced Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) and native Cochliomyia macellaria. Environmental Entomology, 21: 640–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J.D., and Greenberg, B. 1992 c. Rates of predation by Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) on Cochliomyia macellaria (Fabr.) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in the laboratory, effect of predator and prey development. Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 68: 12–14.Google Scholar
Wells, J.D., and Greenberg, B. 1994. Resource use by an introduced and native carrion flies. Oecologia, 99: 181–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, J.D., and Kurahashi, H. 1997. Chrysomya megacephala (Fabr.) is more resistant to attack by Ch. rufifacies (Macquart) in a laboratory arena than is Cochliomyia macellaria (Fabr.) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 73: 16–20.Google Scholar
Wilton, D.P. 1954. A study of a blowfly, Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) with special reference to its reproductive behavior (Diptera-Calliphoridae). M.S. thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Zumpt, F. 1965. Myiasis in man and animals in the Old World. Butterworths, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar