Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T23:31:10.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Honeydew associated with four common crop aphid species increases longevity of the parasitoid wasp, Bracon cephi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2023

Tatyana A. Rand Open the ORCID record for Tatyana A. Rand [Opens in a new window]  and
Laura B. Senior
Tatyana A. Rand*
Affiliation:
Pest Management Research Unit, Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1500 N Central Avenue, Sidney, Montana, 59270, United States of America
Laura B. Senior
Affiliation:
Pest Management Research Unit, Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1500 N Central Avenue, Sidney, Montana, 59270, United States of America
*
*Corresponding author. Email: tatyana.rand@usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The absence of sugar resources can be an important factor in limiting the success of parasitoids as biological control agents. Restoring vegetation complexity within agricultural landscapes has thus become a major focus of conservation biological control efforts, with a traditional emphasis on nectar resources. Aphid honeydew is also an important source of sugars that is infrequently considered. We carried out a laboratory experiment to examine the potential effects of honeydew from six different aphid species by crop species combinations on the longevity of Bracon cephi Gahan (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), the most important biological control of the wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), a major pest of wheat in the northern Great Plains of North America. The benefits of honeydew for parasitoid longevity varied significantly among different aphid and crop species, illustrating the complexity of these interactions. However, honeydew produced by four aphid species commonly found in wheat, pea, and canola crops significantly increased the longevity (by two- to threefold) of the parasitoid. The study suggests that honeydew provisioning could be an important mechanism underlying the benefits of crop diversification to support biological control that merits further research.

Type
Scientific Note
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 155 , 2023 , e20
Check for updates
Creative Commons
This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Entomological Society of Canada.
Copyright
© United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 2023.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject Editor: Christopher Cutler

References

Benelli, G., Giunti, G., Tena, A., Desneux, N., Caselli, A., and Canale, A. 2017. The impact of adult diet on parasitoid reproductive performance. Journal of Pest Science, 90: 807–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buteler, M., Weaver, D.K., and Miller, P.R. 2008. Wheat stem sawfly-infested plants benefit from parasitism of the herbivorous larvae. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 10: 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo-Agudo, M., Dregni, J., González-Cabrera, J., Dicke, M., Heimpel, G.E., and Tena, A. 2021. Neonicotinoids from coated seeds toxic for honeydew-feeding biological control agents. Environmental Pollution, 289: 117813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calvo-Agudo, M., Tooker, J.F., Dicke, M., and Tena, A. 2022. Insecticide-contaminated honeydew: risks for beneficial insects. Biological Reviews, 97: 664–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavallini, L., Peterson, R.K., and Weaver, D.K. 2022. Dietary sugars and amino acids increase longevity and enhance reproductive parameters of Bracon cephi and B. lissogaster, two parasitoids that specialise on wheat stem sawfly. Physiological Entomology, 45: 24–34.Google Scholar
El-Basha, N.A. 2015. Developmental and reproductive biology of the ecto-larval parasitoid Bracon hebetor Say (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on sesame capsule borer, Antigastra catalaunalis (Duponchel) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences: A, Entomology, 8: 69–78.Google Scholar
Evans, E.W. 1994. Indirect interactions among phytophagous insects: aphids, honeydew, and natural enemies. In Individuals, populations, and patterns in ecology. Edited by Leather, S.R., Mills, N.J., Watt, A.D., and Walters, K.F.A.. Intercept Press, Andover, United Kingdom. Pp. 287–298.Google Scholar
Fahrner, S.J., Lelito, J.P., Blaedow, K., Heimpel, G.E., and Aukema, B.H. 2014. Factors affecting the flight capacity of Tetrastichus planipennisi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a classical biological control agent of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Environmental Entomology, 43: 1603–1612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faria, C.A., Wäckers, F.L., and Turlings, T.C. 2008. The nutritional value of aphid honeydew for non-aphid parasitoids. Basic and Applied Ecology, 9: 286–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, G., Wratten, S.D., and Altieri, M.A. 2004. Ecological engineering for pest management: Advances in habitat manipulation for arthropods. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia. 232 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kheirodin, A., Cárcamo, H.A., and Costamagna, A.C. 2020. Contrasting effects of host crops and crop diversity on the abundance and parasitism of a specialist herbivore in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 35: 1073–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landis, D.A., Wratten, S.D., and Gurr, G.M. 2000. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology, 45: 175–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, T.-X. and Sparks, A.N.J. 2001. Aphids on cruciferous crops: identification and management. AgrLifeExtension Publication B-6109. Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas, United States of America. Available from https://agrilife.org/texaslocalproduce-2/files/2018/07/Aphids-on-Cruciferous-Crops-Identification-and-Management.pdf [accessed 3 May 2023].Google Scholar
Lundgren, J.G. 2009. Relationships of natural enemies and non-prey foods. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 454 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luquet, M., Peñalver-Cruz, A., Satour, P., Anton, S., Cortesero, A.-M., Lavandero, B., and Jaloux, B. 2021. Aphid honeydew may be the predominant sugar source for Aphidius parasitoids even in nectar-providing intercrops. Biological Control, 158: 104596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, A.R., Headley, J.V., Peru, K.M., Michel, N.L., Cessna, A.J., and Morrissey, C.A. 2014. Widespread use and frequent detection of neonicotinoid insecticides in wetlands of Canada’s Prairie Pothole Region. PLOS One, 9: e92821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mockford, A., Westbury, D.B., Ashbrook, K., Urbaneja, A., and Tena, A. 2022. Structural heterogeneity of wildflower strips enhances fructose feeding in parasitoids. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 339: 108139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monticelli, L.S., Tena, A., Idier, M., Amiens-Desneux, E., and Desneux, N. 2020. Quality of aphid honeydew for a parasitoid varies as a function of both aphid species and host plant. Biological Control, 140: 104099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrill, W.L., Kushnak, G.D., and Gabor, J.W. 1998. Parasitism of the wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) in Montana. Biological Control, 12: 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, T.A. and Lundgren, J.G. 2018. Quantifying temporal variation in the benefits of aphid honeydew for biological control of alfalfa weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Environmental Entomology, 48: 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, T.A. and Waters, D.K. 2020. Aphid honeydew enhances parasitoid longevity to the same extent as a high-quality floral resource: implications for conservation biological control of the wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 113: 2022–2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, T.A., Allen, B.L., Campbell, J.W., Jabro, J.D., and Dangi, S.R. 2022. Pests associated with two brassicaceous oilseeds and a cover crop mix under evaluation as fallow replacements in dryland production systems of the northern Great Plains. The Canadian Entomologist, 154: e27. https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2022.14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, T.A., Waters, D.K., Blodgett, S.L., Knodel, J.J., and Harris, M.O. 2014. Increased area of a highly suitable host crop increases herbivore pressure in intensified agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 186: 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, D.A. 2018. The potential of sugar resources in the reproductive biology of wheat stem sawfly parasitoids. MSc thesis. College of Agriculture, Montana State University – Bozeman, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America.Google Scholar
Reis, D.A., Hofland, M.L., Peterson, R.K.D., and Weaver, D.K. 2019. Effects of sucrose supplementation and generation on life-history traits of Bracon cephi and Bracon lissogaster, parasitoids of the wheat stem sawfly. Physiological Entomology, 44: 266–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabri, A., Vandermoten, S., Leroy, P.D., Haubruge, E., Hance, T., Thonart, P., et al. 2013. Proteomic investigation of aphid honeydew reveals an unexpected diversity of proteins. PLOS One, 8: e74656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute Inc. 1989–2021. JMP 15®. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2019a. JMP®15 Fitting Linear Models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2019b. JMP®15 Reliability and Survival Methods. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
Tansey, J., Dosdall, L., Keddie, B., and Sarfraz, R. 2008. Differences in Phyllotreta cruciferae and Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) responses to neonicotinoid seed treatments. Journal of Economic Entomology, 101: 159–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tena, A., Llácer, E., and Urbaneja, A. 2013. Biological control of a non-honeydew producer mediated by a distinct hierarchy of honeydew quality. Biological Control, 67: 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tena, A., Pekas, A., Cano, D., Wäckers, F.L., and Urbaneja, A. 2015. Sugar provisioning maximizes the biocontrol service of parasitoids. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52: 795–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tena, A., Senft, M., Desneux, N., Dregni, J., and Heimpel, G.E. 2018. The influence of aphid-produced honeydew on parasitoid fitness and nutritional state: a comparative study. Basic and Applied Ecology, 29: 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tena, A., Wäckers, F.L., Heimpel, G.E., Urbaneja, A., and Pekas, A. 2016. Parasitoid nutritional ecology in a community context: the importance of honeydew and implications for biological control. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 14: 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tharp, C.I., Blodgett, S.L., and Denke, P.M. 2005. Aphids of economic importance in Montana. MontGuide MT 200503 AG. Montana State University Extension Service, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America. Available from https://agresearch.montana.edu/wtarc/producerinfo/entomology-insect-ecology/RussianWheatAphid/MontGuide.pdf [accessed 10 February 2023].Google Scholar
Vollhardt, I.M.G., Bianchi, F., Wackers, F.L., Thies, C., and Tscharntke, T. 2010. Spatial distribution of flower vs. honeydew resources in cereal fields may affect aphid parasitism. Biological Control, 53: 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wäckers, F.L. 2005. Suitability of (extra-) floral nectar, pollen and honeydew as insect food sources. In Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: a protective mutualism and its applications. Edited by Wäckers, F.L., van Rijn, P., and Bruin, J.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Pp. 17–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wäckers, F.L. and Fadamiro, H. 2005. The vegetarian side of carnivores: use of non-prey food by parasitoids and predators. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods, Davos, Switzerland, 12–16 September, 2005. Edited by Hoddle, M.S.. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Publication FHTET-2005-08. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America. Pp. 420–427.Google Scholar
Wäckers, F.L., van Rijn, P.C.J., and Heimpel, G.E. 2008. Honeydew as a food source for natural enemies: making the best of a bad meal? Biological Control, 45: 176–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar