Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T22:10:36.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Baetis bundyae (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae), described from Arctic Canada is found in northernmost Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2014

Eino Savolainen*
Affiliation:
Kuopio Natural History Museum, Myhkyrinkatu 22, FI-70100, Kuopio, Finland
Marcus K. Drotz
Affiliation:
Lake Vänern Museum of Natural and Cultural History, SE-53154 Lidköping, Sweden
Anssi Saura
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden
Gunilla Ståhls
Affiliation:
Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 17, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: tiirinkaarre@windowslive.com).

Abstract

The taxonomy and identification of mayflies of the Baetis vernus group (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) represents a major challenge in both Europe and North America. The recent description of B. jaervii Savolainen from Finland, a species taxonomically close to the Palaearctic taxon Baetis macani Kimmins and the Nearctic B. bundyae Lehmkuhl, called for clarification of the status and distribution of these species in northernmost Europe. We generated mtDNA COI sequences for establishing the identity of the collected samples. Based on these data we conclude that B. bundyae does occur in northeastern Finland in sympatry with B. macani. Accordingly, this taxon shows a highly interesting distributional pattern across the Nearctic and western Palaearctic regions.

Type
Systematics & Morphology
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Chris Schmidt

References

Ball, S.L., Hebert, P.D.N., Burian, S.K., and Webb, J.M. 2005. Biological identifications of mayflies (Ephmeroptera) using DNA barcodes. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 24: 508524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauernfeind, E. and Humpesch, U.H. 2001. Die Eintagsfliegen Zentraleuropas (Insecta: Ephemeroptera): Bestimmung und Ökologie. Verlag des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Bauernfeind, E. and Soldán, T. 2012. The mayflies of Europe (Ephemeroptera). Apollo Books, Ollerup, Denmark.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilton, D.T., Freeland, J.R., and Okamura, B. 2001. Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32: 159181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonan, G. 2008. Ecological climatology: concepts and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, United States of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittain, J.E. 1975. The life cycle of Baëtis macani Kimmins (Ephemerida) in a Norwegian mountain biotope. Entomologica Scandinavica, 6: 4751.Google Scholar
Brittain, J.E. 2008. Mayflies, biodiversity and climate change. In International advances in the ecology, zoogeography, and systematics of mayflies and stoneflies. Edited by F.R. Harper, J.A. Stanford, and R.L. Newell. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, United States of America. Pp. 114.Google Scholar
Drotz, M.K., Savolainen, E., Saura, A., and Ståhls, G. 2012. The population structure of lotic and lentic mayflies of the Baetis vernus group. The Canadian Entomologist, 144: 679690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engblom, E. 1996. Ephemeroptera (Mayflies). In The aquatic insects of North Europe. Edited by A.N. Nilsson. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, Denmark. Pp. 1353.Google Scholar
Eriksson, U. 1972. The invertebrate fauna of the Kilpisjärvi area, Finnish Lapland. 10. Dytiscidae. Acta Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica, 80: 121160.Google Scholar
Giberson, D.J., Burian, S.K., and Shouldice, M. 2007. Life history of the northern mayfly, Baetis bundyae in Rankin Inlet, Nunavut, Canada, with updates to the list of mayflies of Nunavut. The Canadian Entomologist, 139: 628642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goloboff, P.A. 1999. Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: solutions for composite optima. Cladistics, 15: 415428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogg, I.D. and Williams, D.D. 1996. Response of stream invertebrates to global-warming thermal regime: an ecosystem-level manipulation. Ecology, 77: 395407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, U. 2003. Baetis Leach 1815, sensu stricto oder sensu lato. Ein Beitrag zum Gattungskonzept auf der Grundlage von Artengruppen mit Bestimmungsschlüsseln. Lauterbornia, 47: 59129.Google Scholar
Kimmins, D.E. 1957. A new lentic species of the genus Baëtis (Ephemeroptera) from North Finland. Notulae Entomologicae, 37: 2729.Google Scholar
Kjærstad, G., Webb, J.M., and Ekrem, T. 2012. A review of the Ephemeroptera of Finnmark – DNA barcodes identify Holarctic relations. Norwegian Journal of Entomology, 59: 182195.Google Scholar
Larsson, D.J., Alarie, Y., and Doughley, R.E. 2000. Predaceous diving bettles (Colepotera: Dytiscidae) of the Nearctic Region with emphasis on the fauna of Canada and Alaska. National Research Council Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Lehmkuhl, D.M. 1973. A new species of Baetis (Ephemeroptera) from ponds in the Canadian Arctic, with biological notes. The Canadian Entomologist, 105: 343346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macan, T.T. 1957. A description of the nymph of Baëtis macani Kimmins. Notulae Entomologicae, 37: 5860.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, United States of America.Google Scholar
McCafferty, W.P. 1994. Additions and corrections to the Ephemeroptera of Alaska. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 96: 177.Google Scholar
Morihara, D.K. and McCafferty, W.P. 1979. Subspecies of the transatlantic species, Baetis macani (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 81: 3437.Google Scholar
Müller-Liebenau, I. 1969. Revision der europäischen Arten der Gattung Baetis Leach, 1815 (Insecta, Ephemeroptera). Gewässer und Abwässer, 48/49: 1214.Google Scholar
Nixon, K.C. 2002. WinClada vs. 1.00.08 [online]. Published by the author. Available from www.cladistics.com [accessed 6 March 2014].Google Scholar
Sanmartín, I., Enghoff, H., and Ronqvist, F. 2001. Patterns of animal dispersal, vicariance and diversification in the Holarctic. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 73: 345390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savolainen, E. 2009. Baetis jaervii sp. n. (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from northern Europe. Entomologica Fennica, 20: 182185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savolainen, E., Drotz, M.K., Hoffsten, P.-O., and Saura, A. 2007. The Baetis vernus group (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) of northernmost Europe: an evidently diverse but poorly understood group of mayflies. Entomologica Fennica, 18: 160167.Google Scholar
Savolainen, E. and Saaristo, M. 1981. Distribution of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) in the biological province of Kuusamo (Ks), Finland. Notulae Entomologicae, 61: 117124.Google Scholar
Ståhls, G. and Savolainen, E. 2008. MtDNA COI barcodes reveal cryptic diversity in the Baetis vernus group (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 46: 8287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., and Kumar, S. 2011. Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28: 27312739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed