Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T07:42:08.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Name Dropping: Toward a Uniform Best Practice on Historical Commemoration in Medicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2022

Joseph M. Appel*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, New York 10029, USA
*
Corresponding author: Email: jacobmappel@gmail.com

Abstract

The removal of controversial names and monuments from the public sphere in the United States has gained traction in the context of efforts to achieve social justice for historically mistreated and marginalized communities. Such debates are increasingly raising issues in the healthcare setting as hospitals and medical schools grapple with the legacies of figures whose scientific contributions are clouded with ethical transgressions. Present efforts to address these challenges have largely occurred at the institutional level. The results have been guidelines that are complex, highly inconsistent across institutions, and largely downplay the symbolic importance of such historical redress. This paper proposes a simpler three-part test for name and monument removal in the medical and hospital settings that places greater weight on the symbolic importance of the renaming process itself instead of only considering the outcomes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Panush, RS, Paraschiv, D, Dorff, RE. The tainted legacy of Hans Reiter. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 2003;32:231–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

2. Woywodt, A, Matteson, EL. Wegener’s granulomatosis—probing the untold past of the man behind the eponym. Rheumatology 2006;45:1303–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3. Winkelmann, A, Noack, T. The Clara cell: A “Third Reich eponym”? European Respiratory Journal 2010;36:722–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

4. Sweet, F, Csapó-Sweet, RM. Clauberg’s eponym and crimes against humanity. Israel Medical Association Journal 2012 Dec;14(12):719–23.Google ScholarPubMed

5. O’Connor, M. Surgical experimentation by John Marion Sims in the pre-anaesthetic era. Journal of Law and Medicine 2020 Apr;27(3):527–34.Google Scholar

6. Wall, LL. The controversial Dr. J. Marion Sims (1813–1883). International Urogynecology Journal 2020 Jul;31(7):1299–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Cronin M. Anarcha, Betsey, Lucy, and the women whose names were not recorded: The legacy of J Marion Sims. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2020 Nov 29 (epub ahead of print).

8. Brown K. Statue of colonizer John Sutter removed after being defaced in Sacramento. Los Angeles Times 2020 June 16.

9. Hoover A. Rutgers University is named for a slave owner, but its first Black president says the name will stay. Penn Live 2020 July 7.

10. Schuessler J. Johns Hopkins reveals that its founder owned slaves. The New York Times 2020 Dec 9.

11. Sales B. Jewish educator’s name removed from prestigious medical award due to racist, sexist views. Jewish Exponent 2020 Dec 1.

12. Announcement Regarding Bard Hall; 2020 Aug 28; available at https://president.columbia.edu/news/announcement-regarding-bard-hall (last accessed 30 May 2021).

13. Letter of the Committee to Establish Principles on Renaming; 2016 Nov 21; available at https://president.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/CEPR_FINAL_12-2-16.pdf (last accessed 30 May 2021).

14. Principles and Procedures for Renaming Buildings and Other Features at Stanford University; 2018; available at https://campusnames.stanford.edu/renaming-principles (last accessed 30 May 2021).

15. See note 13, Letter of the Committee to Establish Principles on Renaming 2016.

16. See note 13, Letter of the Committee to Establish Principles on Renaming 2016.

17. See note 14, Principles and Procedures for Renaming Buildings and Other Features at Stanford University 2018.

18. Report of the Trustee Committee on Woodrow Wilson’s Legacy at Princeton; 2017 Aug; available at https://www.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/documents/2017/08/Wilson-Committee-Report-Final.pdf (last accessed 30 May 2021).

19. Harkness, JM. Prisoners and pellagra. Public Health Reports 1996;111(5):463–7.Google ScholarPubMed

20. Francis, T, Salk, JE, Pearson, HE, Brown, PN. Protective effect of vaccination against induced influenza A. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 1944;55(2):104–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21. Harmon AJ. Watson had a chance to salvage his reputation on race. He made things worse. The New York Times 2019 Jan 1.

22. Science must acknowledge its past mistakes and crimes. Nature 2017 Sept 4;549(7670):5–6.

23. See note 22, Science must acknowledge its past mistakes and crimes 2017.

24. See note 13, Letter of the Committee to Establish Principles on Renaming 2016.

25. See note 13, Letter of the Committee to Establish Principles on Renaming 2016.

26. Kimball, BA, Coquillette, DR. The Intellectual Sword: Harvard Law School, the Second Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2020.Google Scholar

27. Appel JM. Judging medical history. Education Update 2015 Mar/Apr.

28. Office of Diversity and Inclusion Review Committee on Parran Hall. Report and Recommendations. University of Pittsburgh; 2018 June 11, at 4.

29. Sanky, C, Appel, JM. Tainted largess: A moral framework for medical school donations. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2020:29(3):437–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30. Kowalczyk L. In about face hospital will disperse portraits of past white male luminaries. Boston Globe 2018 June 18.

31. Atlas, MC. Ethics and access to teaching materials in the medical library: The case of the Pernkopf atlas. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 2001;89(1):51–8.Google ScholarPubMed

32. Herschthal, E. Antislavery science in the early republic: The case of Dr. Benjamin Rush. Early American Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2017;15(2):274307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. Matthews D. Woodrow Wilson was extremely racist—even by the standards of his time. Vox 2015 Nov 20.

34. See note 14, Principles and Procedures for Renaming Buildings and Other Features at Stanford University 2018.

35. Keye W. Point: If memorials to the Confederacy should be torn down, so should the Amherst name. The Massachusetts Daily Collegian 2017 Sept 10.

36. If higher ed institutions change names, there’s a cost. Marketplace; 2015 Oct 6; available at https://www.marketplace.org/2015/10/06/if-higher-ed-institutions-change-names-theres-cost (last accessed May 30 2021).

37. See note 35, Keye 2017.

38. Svrluga S. Faculty resoundingly votes to change the name of Washington and Lee. The Washington Post 2020 July 7.