Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-zpsnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T23:13:02.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fear of Life, Fear of Death, and Fear of Causing Death: How Legislative Changes on Assisted Dying Are Doomed to Fail

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2017

MATTI HÄYRY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Fear of life, fear of death, and fear of causing death form a combination that prevents reasoned changes in laws concerning end-of-life situations. This is shown systematically in this article using the methods of conceptual analysis. Prevalent fears are explicated and interpreted to see how their meanings differ depending on the chosen normative stance. When the meanings have been clarified, the impact of the fears on the motivations and justifications of potential legislative reforms are assessed. Two main normative stances are evoked. The first makes an appeal to individual self-determination, or autonomy, and the second to the traditional professional ethics of physicians. These views partly share qualifying elements, including incurability and irreversibility of the patient’s medical condition, proximity of death, the unbearable nature of suffering, and issues of voluntariness further shade the matter. The conclusion is that although many motives to change end-of-life laws are admirable, they are partly contradictory, as are calls for autonomy and appeals to professional ethics; to a degree that good, principled legislative solutions remain improbable in the foreseeable future.

Keywords

ethicseuthanasiaend of lifeassisted suicidefearlifedeathcausing deathlawlegislationmedicalhealthcareprofessional ethics
Type
Special Section: Open Forum
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 145 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. France adopts sedated dying law as compromise on euthanasia. Guardian January 28, 2016 available at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/jan/28/france-adopts-sedated-dying-law-as-compromise-on-euthanasia (last accessed 21 May 2017).

2. Citizens’ initiative on euthanasia proceeds to Parliament, Finnish Broadcasting Company December 19, 2016; available at http://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/citizens_initiative_on_euthanasia_proceeds_to_parliament/9360850 (last accessed 21 May 2017).

3. Euthanasia & Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS) around the World: Legal Status in 28 Countries from Australia to Uruguay. ProCon.org, July 20, 2016; available at http://euthanasia.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000136 (last accessed 21 May 2017).

4. Brazier, M, Cave, E. Medicine, Patients and the Law, 4th ed. London: Penguin Books; 2007, at 52.Google Scholar

5. Huxtable, R, Möller, M. “Setting a principled boundary”? Euthanasia as a response to “life fatigue.” Bioethics 2007;21:117–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Häyry, M. Prescribing cannabis: Freedom, autonomy, and values. Journal of Medical Ethics 2004;30:333–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

7. Takala, T. Concepts of “person” and “liberty,” and their implications to our fading notions of autonomy. Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33:225–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

8. Häyry M. The tension between self-governance and absolute inner worth in Kant’s moral philosophy. Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;31:645–7.

9. Häyry, M. Liberal Utilitarianism and Applied Ethics. London: Routledge; 1994.Google Scholar

10. Häyry, M, Takala, T. Coercion. In: ten Have, H, ed. Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Cham: Springer; 2016.Google Scholar

11. O’Neill, O. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002, at 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. Kimsma, GK. Death by request in The Netherlands: Facts, the legal context and effects on physicians, patients and families. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 2010;13:355–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13. Emanuel, EJ, Onwuteaka-Philipsen, BD, Urwin, JW, Cohen, J. Attitudes and practices of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe. JAMA 2016;316:79–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

14. Häyry, M. Considerable life extension and three views on the meaning of life. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2011;20:21–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed