Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:58:38.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is a European Community Law Judge?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Lord Slynn Hadley
Get access

Extract

It is good that the Cambridge Law Faculty has established a Centre for European Legal Studies. In the first place because it is plain that practising lawyers in the future will need to be increasingly aware of European Community Law—whether they are taught it as a separate subject or as a part of specialist areas of the law. In the second place because if, as I also think, Britain should be not only at the heart but also at the head of Europe, if it is in it at all, there are few better ways of preparing our future political and administrative leaders than by a grounding in Community law.

Type
Articles
Information
The Cambridge Law Journal , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , July 1993 , pp. 234 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See article 167, EEC Treaty.Google Scholar

2 Ibid.

3 Ibid..

4 Ibid..

5 See the Cassis de Dijon case. Case 120/78 [1979] E.C.R. 649; [1979] 3 C.M.L.R. 494.Google Scholar

6 Luisi and Carbone v. Minislero del Tesoro, Joined Cases 286/82 and 26/83, [1984] E.C.R. 377;[1985] 3 C.M.L.R. 52.Google Scholar

7 Thieffry v. Conseil de l'ordre des Avocats à la Cour de Paris, Case 71/76 [1977 2 C.M.L.R. 373.Google Scholar

8 Parliament v. Council (Comitology), Case 302/87, [1988] E.C.R. 5615.Google Scholar

9 See Draft Treaty on a European Economic Area [1992] 1 C.M.L.R. 921; Opinion 1/91, re The Draft Treaty on a European Economic Area (No. 1) [1992] 1 C.M.L.R. 245; Opinion 1/92, re The Draft Treaty on a European Economic Area (No. 2) [1992] 2 C.M.L.R. 217.Google Scholar

10 R. v. Secretary of State for Transport, Ex parte Factorlame (No. 2) [1991] 1 A.C.Google Scholar

11 Foto-Frost v. Hauptzollamt Lübeck-ost, Case 314/85 (1987) E.C.R. 4199; [1988] 3 C.M.L.R.57.Google Scholar

12 Cilfit v. Ministry of Health, Case 283/81, [1982] E.C.R. 3415; [1983] 1 C.M.L.R. 472.Google Scholar

13 Ibid.

14 Simmenthal, Case 106/77 [1978] E.C.R. 629.Google Scholar

15 Van Genden Loos. Case 26/62 [1963] E.C.R. 1.Google Scholar

16 Simmenthal, note 14 above.

17 Marleasing, Case C-106/89 [1990] E.C.R. 4135.Google Scholar

18 Francovich v. Italian Republic, Joint Cases C-6/90 and C-9/90, [1992] I.R.L.R. 84.Google Scholar