Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-27T05:11:20.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Slow Progress in Striking Out Dilatory Litigants: “No Second Bite at the Cherry”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2001

Get access

Extract

For many years the problem of delay has plagued English civil proceedings. The main instrument used to counter it has been the power to strike out claims on the basis of “want of prosecution” (Allen v. Sir Alfred McAlpine & Sons Ltd. [1968] 2 Q.B. 229, C.A.; Birkett v. James [1978] A.C. 297, H.L.). But, notoriously, this doctrine long ago lost its snap. Now the Court of Appeal in Securum Finance Ltd. v. Ashton [2000] 3 W.L.R. 1400 has sharpened the doctrine’s bite, or at least lengthened its leash, by deciding that this power of dismissal extends to claims which are not yet statute barred.

Type
Case and Comment
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)