No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 December 2011
Foreign policy is an extremely elastic term. It may mean a great deal or very little: it may embrace the most vital interests of the world at large—humanity's very right to live and prosper—if it be the Foreign Policy of a World Power like the British Empire; or it may merely concern the interests of a particular country from a certain angle, that is to say, in so far as such interests may conflict with those of another nation or nations. These two aspects of Foreign Policy, the world and the regional, were clearly distinguished and defined after the Great War, when at the Conference which culminated in the Versailles Treaty the nations were classified as countries with world interests and countries with limited interests. It was, furthermore, given juridical expression in the composition of the Council of the League of Nations, in which World Powers were given permanent seats and the other members of the League were assigned an equal number of elective seats which they were to occupy for a limited period of time.
Substance of an Address on “Foreign Policy”—delivered by Don Agustin Edwards, Oct. 11, 1924, to the “Junior Historians” at Cambridge.
page 288 note 1 The whole document is translated in the Monroe Doctrine by Alvarez—Carnegie Endowment (1925), pp. 113–16.Google Scholar
page 289 note 1 Colombia, Mexico, Guatemala and Peru. Great Britain and the Netherlands were also invited, but sent only unofficial representatives.
page 290 note 1 A protocol of this Conference is in Alvarez, pp. 168–76.
page 291 note 1 That of Tacna-Arica—which he has decided is to be settled by plébiscite.