Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:49:14.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisiting the Dead: Tomb Reuse and Post-Burial Practices at Ascoli Satriano (Pre-Roman Apulia, Seventh–Fourth Century bc)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2018

Matthias Hoernes Open the ORCID record for Matthias Hoernes [Opens in a new window] ,
Christian Heitz Open the ORCID record for Christian Heitz [Opens in a new window]  and
Manuele Laimer
Matthias Hoernes
Affiliation:
Leopold-Franzens-Universität InnsbruckForschungsschwerpunkt ‘Kulturelle Begegnungen – Kulturelle Konflikte’ Innrain 52d A-6020 InnsbruckAustria Email: matthias.hoernes@uibk.ac.at
Christian Heitz
Affiliation:
Leopold-Franzens-Universität InnsbruckInstitut für Archäologien Langer Weg 11 A-6020 InnsbruckAustria Email: christian.heitz@uibk.ac.at
Manuele Laimer
Affiliation:
Leopold-Franzens-Universität InnsbruckInstitut für Archäologien Langer Weg 11 A-6020 InnsbruckAustria Email: manuele.laimer@uibk.ac.at
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the archaeology of death and burial, the premise that the dead were buried ritually and not simply disposed of seems to be accepted without argument. Where graves were reopened and reused for subsequent burials, however, the post-funeral manipulation of ‘older’ depositions is often regarded as having been primarily pragmatic and circumstantial. Countering this interpretative imbalance, we argue that the reuse of tombs was a highly complex procedure that forced communities into negotiating and formalizing, or even ritualizing, the way in which bodies and objects were acted on and engaged with. Taking the necropolis Giarnera Piccola/Ascoli Satriano in pre-Roman northern Apulia as a case study, and employing a microarchaeological-archaeothanatological perspective, we discuss the diverse and sometimes conflicting practices used to deal with pre-existing graves, objects and human remains, identifying tensions between maintaining or reconstructing the integrity of the body and intentionally manipulating and fragmenting it. We argue that repeatedly reused tombs constituted a socially and symbolically charged arena for a prolonged, active relationship with the deceased and for mobilizing, mediating and maintaining inter-generational memories.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 261 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, B., 2008. ‘Reading the body’: Geschlechterdifferenz im Totenritual der frühen Eisenzeit, in Körperinszenierung – Objektsammlung – Monumentalisierung: Totenritual und Grabkult in frühen Gesellschaften: Archäologische Quellen in kulturwissenschaftlicher Perspektive, eds. Kümmel, C., Schweizer, B. & Veit, U.. (Tübinger Archäologische Taschenbücher 6.) Münster: Waxmann, 375–95.Google Scholar
Aspöck, E., 2018. A high-resolution approach to the formation processes of a reopened early Bronze Age inhumation grave in Austria: taphonomy of human remains. Quaternary International 474, 131–45.Google Scholar
Augstein, M., 2013. Gräber – Orte der Lebenden und der Toten, Medien der Kommunikation, in Interpretierte Eisenzeiten: Fallstudien, Methoden, Theorie: Tagungsbeiträge der 5. Linzer Gespräche zur interpretativen Eisenzeitarchäologie, eds. Karl, R. & Leskovar, J.. (Studien zur Kulturgeschichte von Oberösterreich 37.) Linz: Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum, 107–22.Google Scholar
Bell, C., 1992. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bello, S. & Andrews, P., 2006. The intrinsic pattern of preservation of human skeletons and its influence on the interpretation of funerary behaviours, in Social Archaeology of Funerary Remains, eds. Gowland, R. & Knüsel, C.. Oxford: Oxbow, 1–13.Google Scholar
Bérard, R.-M., 2017. Mégara Hyblaea 6. La nécropole méridionale de la cité archaïque. 2. Archéologie et histoire sociale des rituels funéraires. Rome: École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Blin, A. & Chambon, P., 2013. Du cadavre à l'oubli: désindividualisation et déshumanisation des restes dans les sépultures collectives néolithiques. Les nouvelles de l'archéologie 132, 65–70.Google Scholar
Bottini, A., Fresa, M.P. & Tagliente, M., 1990. L'evoluzione della struttura di un centro daunio fra VII e III secolo: l'esempio di Forentum, in Italici in Magna Grecia. Lingua, insediamenti e strutture, ed. Tagliente, M.. Venosa: Edizioni Osanna, 233–64.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, N., 2013. Bestattungssitten zwischen Tradition und Modifikation. Kulturelle Austauschprozesse in den griechischen Kolonien in Unteritalien und Sizilien vom 8. bis zum 5. Jh. v. Chr. (Italiká 2.) Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Cassimatis, H., 1990. Propos sur le calathos dans la céramique italiote, in ΕΥΜΟΥΣΙΑ. Ceramic and Iconographic Studies in Honour of Alexander Cambitoglou, ed. Descœudres, J.-P.. (Mediterranean Archaeology Supplement 1.) Sydney: Meditarch, 195–201.Google Scholar
Chénier, A., 2009. Bones, people and communities: tensions between individual and corporate identities in secondary burials. Nexus. The Canadian Student Journal of Anthropology 21, 27–40.Google Scholar
Cornell, P. & Fahlander, F., 2002. Microarchaeology, materiality and social practice. Current Swedish Archaeology 10, 21–38.Google Scholar
Corrente, M. & Liseno, M.G., 2010. Osservazioni sulla storia del popolamento di Ausculum preromana: la comunità di Valle Castagna, in 30° Convegno Nazionale sulla Preistoria – Protostoria – Storia della Daunia, San Severo 21–22 novembre 2009, ed. Gravina, A.. San Severo: Archeoclub d'Italia, 259–90.Google Scholar
Crendall, J.J. & Martin, D.L., 2014. The bioarchaeology of postmortem agency: integrating archaeological theory with human skeletal remains. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 24(3), 429–35.Google Scholar
Crevecoeur, I., Schmitt, A. & Schoep, I., 2015. An archaeothanatological approach to the study of Minoan funerary practices: case-studies from the Early and Middle Minoan cemetery at Sissi, Crete. Journal of Field Archaeology 40(3), 283–99.Google Scholar
Devlin, Z.L. & Graham, E.-J. (eds.), 2015. Death Embodied: Archaeological approaches to the treatment of the corpse. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Duday, H., 2006. L'archéothanatologie ou l'archéologie de la mort [Archaeothanatology or the archaeology of death], in Social Archaeology of Funerary Remains, eds. Gowland, R. & Knüsel, C.. Oxford: Oxbow, 30–56.Google Scholar
Duday, H., 2008. Archaeological proof of an abrupt mortality crisis: simultaneous deposit of cadavers, simultaneous deaths?, in Paleomicrobiology: Past human infections, eds. Raoult, D. & Drancourt, M.. Berlin: Springer, 49–54.Google Scholar
Duday, H. 2009. The Archaeology of the Dead: Lectures in archaeothanatology. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Dupras, T.L. & Schultz, J.J., 2013. Taphonomic bone staining and color changes in forensic contexts, in Manual of Forensic Taphonomy, eds. Pokines, J. & Symes, S.A.. London: CRC Press, 315–40.Google Scholar
Esparza, A., Palomo-Díez, S., Velasco-Vázquez, J., Delibes, G., Arroyo-Pardo, E. & Salazar-García, D.C., 2017. Familiar kinship? Palaeogenetic and isotopic evidence from a triple burial of the Cogotas I archaeological culture (Bronze Age, Iberian Peninsula). Oxford Journal of Archaeology 36(3), 223–42.Google Scholar
Fabbri, M., Mazzei, M., Osanna, M. & Virtuoso, T., 2003. Sacrificio e banchetto funebre nella Daunia preromana: l'area sacra di Ausculum. Siris 3, 23–106.Google Scholar
Fabbri, M. & Osanna, M., 2002. Ausculum I. L'abitato daunio sulla collina del Serpente di Ascoli Satriano. Foggia: Grenzi.Google Scholar
Fabbri, M. & Osanna, M., 2005. Aspetti del sacro nel mondo apulo: rituali di abbandono tra area sacra e abitato nell'antica Ausculum, in Lo spazio del rito. Santuari e culti in Italia meridionale tra indigeni e greci: Atti delle giornate di studio (Matera, 28 e 29 giugno 2002), eds. Nava, M.L. & Osanna, M.. (Siris Supplement 1.) Bari: Edipuglia, 215–33.Google Scholar
Fahlander, F., 2003. The Materiality of Serial Practice: A microarchaeology of burial. (Gotarc Serie B 23.) Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
Fahlander, F., 2016. The materiality of the ancient dead. Post-burial practices and ontologies of death in southern Sweden AD 800–1200. Current Swedish Archaeology 24, 137–62.Google Scholar
Fahlander, F. & Oestigaard, T. (eds.), 2008. The Materiality of Death: Bodies, burials, beliefs. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Gardeła, L. & Kajkowski, K. (eds.), 2015. Kończyny, kości i wtórnie otwarte groby w dawnych kulturach. Limbs, Bones, and Reopened Graves in Past Societies. Bytów: Muzeum Zachodniokaszubskie.Google Scholar
Gramsch, A., 2013. Treating bodies. Transformative and communicative practices, in The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial, eds. Tarlow, S. & Nilsson Stutz, L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 459–74.Google Scholar
Greiner, C., 2003. Die Peuketia: Kultur und Kulturkontakte in Mittelapulien vom 8. bis 5. Jh. v. Chr. Remshalden-Grunbach: Greiner.Google Scholar
Guzzo, P.G., 1993. Oreficerie dalla Magna Grecia: Ornamenti in oro e argento dall'Italia meridionale tra l'VIII ed il I secolo. Taranto: La Colomba.Google Scholar
Heitz, C., in press. Gesellschaft und Wirtschaft im archaischen Süditalien. Ein Modell zu Identität und Hexis, ausgehend von Ripacandida und weiteren binnenländischen Gemeinschaften. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Hill, E. & Hageman, J.B. (eds.), 2016. The Archaeology of Ancestors. Death, memory, and veneration. Gainesville (FL): University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Hofmann, K.P., 2013. Gräber und Totenrituale: Zu aktuellen Theorien und Forschungsansätzen, in Theorie in der Archäologie: Zur jüngeren Diskussion in Deutschland, eds. Eggert, M.K.H. & Veit, U.. (Tübinger Archäologische Taschenbücher 10.) Münster: Waxmann, 269–98.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D.L. & Aragon, L.V., 2002. Collective burials and community memories: interpreting the placement of the dead in the southeastern and mid-Atlantic United States with reference to ethnographic cases from Indonesia. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 11(1), 27–54.Google Scholar
Iker, R., 1984. Ordona VII/1: Les tombes dauniennes: les tombes du VIIIe au début du IVe siècles avant notre ère. Brussels: Academia Belgica.Google Scholar
Iker, R., 1986. Ordona VII/2: Les tombes dauniennes: les tombes du IVe et du début du IIIe siècles avant notre ère. Brussels: Academia Belgica.Google Scholar
Juengst, S.L. & Becker, S.K. (eds.), 2017. The Bioarchaeology of Community. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 28, special issue.Google Scholar
Kerner, J., 2018. Manipulations post-mortem du corps humain. Implications archéologiques et anthropologiques. Leiden: Sidestone.Google Scholar
Klevnäs, A., 2015. Give and take: grave goods and grave robbery in the early middle ages, in Own and Be Owned: Archaeological approaches to the concept of possession, eds. Klevnäs, A. & Hedenstierna-Jonson, C.. (Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 62.) Stockholm: Publit, 157–88.Google Scholar
Knüsel, C.J., 2014. Crouching in fear: terms of engagement for funerary remains. Journal of Social Archaeology 14(1), 26–58.Google Scholar
Knüsel, C.J. & Robb, J., 2016. Funerary taphonomy: an overview of goals and methods. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 10, 655–73.Google Scholar
Kuijt, I., 2008. The regeneration of life: Neolithic structures of symbolic remembering and forgetting. Current Anthropology 49(2), 171–97.Google Scholar
Kümmel, C., 2009. Ur- und frühgeschichtlicher Grabraub. Archäologische Interpretation und kulturanthropologische Erklärung. (Tübinger Schriften zu Ur- und Frühgeschichtlichen Archäologie 9.) Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Laimer, M., 2016. Ascoli Satriano, Giarnera Piccola. Nuovi dati sulle campagne di scavo 2010–2014, in 36° Convegno Nazionale sulla Preistoria – Protostoria – Storia della Daunia, San Severo 15–16 novembre 2015, ed. Gravina, A.. San Severo: Archeoclub d'Italia, 217–34.Google Scholar
Laimer, M. & Larcher, A., 2006. Archäologische Ausgrabungen in der Giarnera Piccola in Ascoli Satriano (Provinz Foggia) 1999 und 2001–2005. Römische Historische Mitteilungen 48, 17–68.Google Scholar
Larcher, A., 2001. Österreichische Ausgrabungen in Daunien: Ascoli Satriano, Provinz Foggia. Römische Historische Mitteilungen 43, 145–77.Google Scholar
Larcher, A. & Defranceschi, O., 2012. Das sogenannte Kriegergrab auf dem Colle Serpente in Ascoli Satriano. Römische Historische Mitteilungen 54, 15–52.Google Scholar
Larcher, A. & Laimer, M., 2010a. Ausgrabungen in Ascoli Satriano, Giarnera Piccola 2006–2009. Vorläufiger Bericht. Römische Historische Mitteilungen 52, 15–78.Google Scholar
Larcher, A. & Laimer, M., 2010b. A controllo del Carapelle: la comunità di Giarnera Piccola, in 30° Convegno Nazionale sulla Preistoria – Protostoria – Storia della Daunia, San Severo 21–22 novembre 2009, ed. Gravina, A.. San Severo: Archeoclub d'Italia, 241–58.Google Scholar
Larcher, A. & Laimer, M., 2013. Ascoli Satriano, Giarnera Piccola. Vorbericht zu den Grabungskampagnen 2010–2012. Römische Historische Mitteilungen 55, 15–80.Google Scholar
Larcher, A. & Müller, F.M., 2008. Scavi dell'Università di Innsbruck sul Colle Serpente ad Ascoli Satriano dal 1997 al 2002, in Storia e archeologia della Daunia: In ricordo di Marina Mazzei: Atti delle Giornate di studi (Foggia 19–21 maggio 2005), eds. Volpe, G., José Strazzulla, M. & Leone, D.. Bari: Edipuglia, 133–48.Google Scholar
Liseno, M. G., 2012. Tomba 8 di Valle Castagna, in Lo spreco necessario: Il lusso nelle tombe di Ascoli Satriano, ed. Corrente, M.. (Ausculum 2.) Foggia: Grenzi, 171–88.Google Scholar
Lohmann, H., 1979. Grabmäler auf unteritalischen Vasen. (Archäologische Forschungen 7.) Berlin: Mann.Google Scholar
Meyer, Ch., Ganslmeier, R., Dresely, V. & Alt, K.W., 2012. New approaches to the reconstruction of kinship and social structure based on bioarchaeological analysis of Neolithic multiple and collective graves, in Theoretical and Methodological Considerations in Central European Neolithic Archaeology: Proceedings of the Theory and Method in Archaeology of the Neolithic (7th–3rd millennium BC) Conference held in Mikulov, Czech Republic, 26th–28th of October 2010, eds. Kolář, J. & Trampota, F.. (BAR International series S2325.) Oxford: Archaeopress, 11–23.Google Scholar
Müller, F.M., 2007. Überlegungen zu Funktion, Verzierungen und Fundkontexten daunischer Webgewichte, in Interpretierte Eisenzeiten: Fallstudien, Methoden, Theorie: Tagungsbeiträge der 2. Linzer Gespräche zur interpretativen Eisenzeitarchäologie, eds. Karl, R. & Leskovar, J.. (Studien zur Kulturgeschichte von Oberösterreich 19.) Linz: Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum, 291–303.Google Scholar
Müller, F.M. & Schemel, E.M., 2008. Archäologische Zeugnisse für rituelle und kultische Praktiken im antiken Daunien, in Ritus und Religion in der Eisenzeit. Beiträge zur Sitzung der AG Eisenzeit während der Jahrestagung des Mittel- und Ostdeutschen Verbandes für Altertumsforschung e. V. in Halle an der Saale 2007, eds. Eggl, C., Trebsche, P., Balzer, I. et al. (Beiträge zur Ur- und Frühgeschichte Europas 49.) Langenweißbach: Beier & Beran, 79–88.Google Scholar
Nikita, E., 2017. Osteoarchaeology: A guide to the macroscopic study of human skeletal remains. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Nilsson Stutz, L., 2003. Embodied Rituals & Ritualized Burials: Tracing ritual practices in Late Mesolithic burials. (Acta Archaeologica Lundensia 46.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Nilsson Stutz, L., 2008. More than metaphor: approaching the human cadaver in archaeology, in The Materiality of Death: Bodies, burials, beliefs, eds. Fahlander, F. & Oestigaard, T.. Oxford: Archaeopress, 19–28.Google Scholar
Nilsson Stutz, L., 2010. The way we bury our dead: reflections on mortuary ritual, community and identity at the time of the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition. Documenta Praehistorica 37, 33–42.Google Scholar
Nilsson Stutz, L., 2015. A proper burial: some thoughts on changes in mortuary ritual, and how archaeology can begin to understand them, in Death and Changing Rituals: Function and meaning in ancient funerary practices, eds. Brandt, J.R., Prusac, M. & Roland, H.. (Studies in Funerary Archaeology 7.) Oxford: Oxbow, 1–16.Google Scholar
Obojes, L., 2016. Kinderbestattungen in Daunien – Nordapulien (7.–3. Jh.). Ein Überblick, in Akten des 15. Österreichischen Archäologentages in Innsbruck, 27. Februar–1. März 2014, eds. Grabherr, G. & Kainrath, B.. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press, 257–63.Google Scholar
Osanna, M., 2004. Rituali sacrificali e offerte votive nel santuario lucano di Torre di Satriano. Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 6, 45–62.Google Scholar
Osanna, M., 2008. Monumenti, commemorazione e memoria in Daunia: la collina del Serpente di Ascoli Satriano tra età arcaica e conquista romana, in Storia e archeologia della Daunia: In ricordo di Marina Mazzei: Atti delle Giornate di studi (Foggia 19–21 maggio 2005), eds. Volpe, G., José Strazzulla, M. & Leone, D.. Bari: Edipuglia, 149–70.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, A.J., Baustian, K.M. & Martin, D.L. (eds.), 2014. Commingled and Disarticulated Human Remains: Working toward improved theory, method, and data. New York (NY): Springer.Google Scholar
Rebay-Salisbury, K., 2016. The Human Body in Early Iron Age Central Europe. Burial practices and images of the Hallstatt world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rebay-Salisbury, K., Stig Sørensen, M.L. & Hughes, J. (eds.), 2010. Body Parts and Bodies Whole: Changing relations and meanings. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Robb, J., 2013. Creating death: an archaeology of dying, in The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial, eds. Tarlow, S. & Nilsson Stutz, L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 441–58.Google Scholar
Röder, B., 2012. Beyond elites: Neoevolutionistische Gesellschaftstypologien und Verwandtschaftsforschung als Alternative zur archäologischen Elitenforschung?, in Beyond Elites. Alternatives to hierarchical systems in modelling social formations. International Conference at the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany, October 22–24, 2009, vol. 2, eds. Kienlin, T.L. & Zimmermann, A.. (Universitätsforschungen zur Prähistorischen Archäologie 215.) Bonn: Habelt, 105–24.Google Scholar
Roksandic, M., 2002. Position of skeletal remains as a key to understanding mortuary behavior, in Advances in Forensic Taphonomy: Method, theory, and archaeological perspectives, eds. Haglund, W.D. & Sorg, M.H.. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, 99–117.Google Scholar
Rösing, F.W., Graw, M., Marré, B., et al. , 2005. Empfehlungen für die forensische Geschlechts- und Altersdiagnose am Skelett. Anthropologischer Anzeiger 63(2), 221–32.Google Scholar
Rückl, J., 2012. Ipogeo dei profumi, in Lo spreco necessario: Il lusso nelle tombe di Ascoli Satriano, ed. Corrente, M.. (Ausculum 2.) Foggia: Grenzi, 222–49.Google Scholar
Rugg, J. & Holland, S., 2017. Respecting corpses: the ethics of grave re-use. Mortality 22(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/13576275.2016.1192591Google Scholar
Schemel, E., 2008. Daunische Kieselpflasterungen in Ascoli Satriano, Prov. Foggia (Apulien), in Akten des 11. Österreichischen Archäologentages in Innsbruck, 23.–25. März 2006, eds. Grabherr, G. & Kainrath, B.. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press, 251–9.Google Scholar
Sørensen, T.F., 2016. In praise of vagueness: uncertainty, ambiguity and archaeological methodology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23(2), 741–63.Google Scholar
Tinè Bertocchi, F., 1985. Le necropoli daunie di Ascoli Satriano e Arpi. Genoa: Sagep Editori.Google Scholar
Valentin, F., Rivoal, I., Thevenet, C. & Sellier, P. (eds.), 2014. La chaîne opératoire funéraire: Ethnologie et archéologie de la mort. Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Weiss-Krejci, E., 2011. The formation of mortuary deposits: implications for understanding mortuary behavior of past populations, in Social Bioarchaeology, eds. Agarwal, S.C. & Glencross, B.. Malden (MA): Wiley-Blackwell, 68–106.Google Scholar
Weiss-Krejci, E., 2015. The distinction between funeral and burial and why it matters, in Le Funéraire: Mémoire, protocoles, monuments, eds. Delaplace, G. & Valentin, F.. (Collection Colloques de la Maison Archéologie & Ethnologie, René-Ginouvès 11.) Paris: De Boccard, 35–47.Google Scholar
Yntema, D., 2013. The Archaeology of South-East Italy in the first millennium BC: Greek and native societies of Apulia and Lucania between the 10th and the 1st century BC. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar