Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:16:46.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Nuclear Generator of Clouds: Accidents and Radioactive Contamination Identified on Declassified Satellite Photographs in the Mayak Chemical Combine, Southern Urals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2021

Grzegorz Kiarszys Open the ORCID record for Grzegorz Kiarszys [Opens in a new window]
Grzegorz Kiarszys*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology Szczecin University ul. Krakowska 71–79 71-017 Szczecin Poland Emil: grzegorz.kiarszys@usz.edu.pl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Mayak Chemical Combine was one of the most secretive places in the Soviet Union. It was built in the southern Urals, close to Kyshtym. The facility produced weapons-grade plutonium and other radioactive isotopes for the Soviet nuclear military programme. Fugitives from behind the Iron Curtain mentioned the site, usually due to accidents and peculiar, unexplained observations. Such reports were often treated in the West as exaggerated or fictional, as they spoke of large-scale disasters, deportations and vast landscape transformations. This paper aims to present the research potential of declassified Cold War intelligence records for archaeological landscape studies of off-limits military sites. To outline a somewhat broader perspective, I will combine those sources with contemporary historical knowledge and modern remote sensing data. The analysis will be focused on the Central Intelligence Agency [CIA] satellite imagery (CORONA and GAMBIT) from the 1960s to the beginning of the 1970s. The discussed sources recorded outcomes of nuclear disasters, hundreds of square kilometres of uninhabited wasteland, abandoned villages, disappearing lakes, dying forests, diverted rivers, and other features related to this clandestine plutonium facility.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , August 2022 , pp. 409 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarkrog, A., Dahlgaard, H., Frissel, M., et al. , 1992. Sources of anthropogenic radionuclides in the southern Urals. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 15, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarkrog, A., Dahlgaard, H., Nielsen, S.P., et al. , 1997. Radioactive inventories from the Kyshtym and Karachay accidents: estimates based on soil samples collected in the south Urals (1990–1995). Science of the Total Environment 201, 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarkrog, A., Trapeznikov, A.V., Molchanova, I.V., et al. , 2000. Environmental modelling of radioactive contamination of floodplains and sorlakes along the Techa and Iset rivers. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 49, 243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K., 2013. Plutopia: Nuclear families, atomic cities, and the great Soviet and American plutonium disasters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brugioni, D.A., 1989. The serendipity effect of aerial reconnaissance. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 14, 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burström, M., 2009. Garbage or heritage. The existential dimension of a car cemetery, in Contemporary Archaeologies — Excavating now, eds Holtorf, C. & Piccini, A.. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 133–45.Google Scholar
Burström, M., Acosta, T.D., Noriega, E.G., et al. , 2013. Memories of a world crisis: the archaeology of a former Soviet nuclear missile site in Cuba. Journal of Social Archaeology 9(3), 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chertok, B., 2006. Rockets and People. Creating a rocket industry, Vol. II. Washington (DC): NASA History Division.Google Scholar
CIA, 1962. Nuclear Energy and Miscellaneous Plants in and Near Sverdlovsk (CREST record number CIA RDP80T00246A061800100001-4). College Park (MD): National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
CIA, 1964a. Photographic Interpretation Report. Kyshtym Atomic Energy Complex, USSR (CREST record number CIA RDP02T06408R000800010080-4). College Park (MD): National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
CIA, 1964b. Photographic Interpretation Report. Ancillary facilities, utilities, and transportation networks, Kyshtym Atomic Energy Complex, USSR (CREST record number CIA RDP02T06408R000800010077-8). College Park (MD): National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
CIA, 1967. Photographic Intelligence Report. Reactor Area III. Kyshtym Atomic Energy Complex, USSR (CREST record number CIA RDP02T06408R001200010036-8). College Park (MD): National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
CIA, 1978. The Kyshtym Nuclear Accident (CREST record number CIA RDP05T00644R000100060008-0). College Park (MD): National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
CIA, 1981. USSR: Nuclear Accident Near Kyshtym in 1957–58 (CREST record number CIA 0000498481). College Park (MD): National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
Cochran, T.B., Norris, R.S. & Bukharin, O.A., 1995. Making the Russian Bomb: From Stalin to Yeltsin. San Francisco (CA): Westview Press.Google Scholar
Cochran, T.B., Norris, R.S. & Sukko, K.L., 1993. Radioactive contamination at Chelyabinsk-65, Russia. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 18, 507–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowley, D.C., Ferguson, L.M. & Williams, A., 2013. The Aerial Reconnaissance Archives: a global aerial photographic collection, in Archaeology from Historical Aerial and Satellite Archives, eds Hanson, W.S. & Oltean, I.A.. New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowley, D.C., Standring, R.A. & Abicht, M.J., 2010. Landscapes through the lens: an introduction, in Landscapes Through the Lens: Aerial photographs and the historic environment, eds Cowley, D.C., Standring, R.A. & Abicht, M.J.. Oxford/Oakville: Oxbow, 1–6.Google Scholar
Dickson, D., 1989. Kyshtym ‘almost as bad as Chernobyl’. New Scientist 124(1696/1697), 3–4.Google Scholar
Fairclough, G., 2007. The Cold War in context: archaeological explorations of private, public and political complexity, in A Fearsome Heritage: Diverse legacies of the Cold War, eds Schofield, J. & Cocroft, W.D.. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press, 19–32.Google Scholar
Fowler, M.J.F., 2004. Archaeology through the keyhole: the serendipity effect of aerial reconnaissance revisited. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 29, 118–34.Google Scholar
Fowler, M.J.F., 2008. The application of declassified KH-7 GAMBIT satellite photographs to studies of Cold War material culture: a case study from the former Soviet Union. Antiquity 82, 714–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, M.J.F., 2010. The Skrunda Hen Houses: a case study in Cold War satellite archaeology, in Landscape Through the Lens. Aerial photographs and historic environment, eds Cowley, D.C., Standring, R.A. & Abicht, M.J.. Oxford/Oakville: Oxbow, 287–93.Google Scholar
Fowler, M.J.F., 2013. Declassified intelligence satellite photographs, in Archaeology from Historical Aerial and Satellite Archives, eds Hanson, W.S. & Oltean, I.A.. New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer, 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, K.E., 1995. CORONA, studies in intelligence, supplement, in CORONA: America's first satellite program, CIA Cold War records, ed. Ruffner, K.C.. Washington (DC): CIA History Staff, Center for the Study of Intelligence, 3–39.Google Scholar
Hanson, T.A., 2010. Uncovering the arsenals of Armageddon: the historical archaeology of North American Cold War ballistic missile launch sites. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 25(1), 157–72.Google Scholar
Hanson, T.A., 2016a. The ephemeral and the enduring: trajectories of disappearance for the scientific objects of American Cold War nuclear weapons testing. Theory of Science (Teorie Vědy) 38(3), 279–99.Google Scholar
Hanson, T.A., 2016b. The Archaeology of the Cold War. Gainesville (FL): University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Hanson, W.S. & Oltean, I.A., 2013. A spy in the sky: the potential of historical aerial and satellite photography for archaeological research, in Archaeology from Historical Aerial and Satellite Archives, eds Hanson, W.S. & Oltean, I.A.. New York/London: Springer, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiarszys, G., 2016. Erased landscapes: conflict, memory and post-World War II landscape transformation in western Poland, in Conflict Landscapes and Archaeology from Above, eds Stichelbaut, B. & Cowley, D.C.. Farnham: Ashgate, 219–34.Google Scholar
Kiarszys, G., 2019. The destroyer of worlds hidden in the forest: Cold War nuclear warhead sites in Poland. Antiquity 93, 236–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuletz, V.L., 1998. The Tainted Desert. Environmental and social ruin in the American west. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, D., 1985. The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, D., 1989. Nostalgia tells it like it wasn't, in The Imagined Past. History and nostalgia, eds Shaw, C. & Chase, M.. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 18–32.Google Scholar
McWilliams, A., 2013. An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain. Material and metaphor. Stockholm: Södertörns högskola.Google Scholar
Medvedev, Z.A., 1976. Two decades of dissidence. New Scientist 72(1025), 264–7.Google Scholar
Orwell, G., 1945. You and the atomic bomb. Tribune (October 19).Google Scholar
Pedlow, G.W. & Welzenbach, D.E., 1992. The Central Intelligence Agency and Overhead Reconnaissance. The U-2 and OXCART programs, 1954–1974. Washington (DC): History Staff, Central Intelligence Agency.Google Scholar
Schofield, J., Beck, C. & Drollinger, H., 2006. Alternative archaeologies of the Cold War: the preliminary results of fieldwork at the Greenham and Nevada peace camps, in Landscapes Under Pressure. Theory and practice of cultural heritage research and preservation, ed. Loxny, L.R. New York (NY): Springer, 149–62.Google Scholar
Schofield, J. & Cocroft, W.D. (eds), 2007. A Fearsome Heritage: Diverse legacies of the Cold War. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, J., Cocroft, W.D. & Dobronovskaya, M., 2021. Cold War: a transnational approach to a global heritage. Post-Medieval Archaeology 55(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Соколов, А.К., 2008. Глава I, Принуждение к труду в советской экономике 1930-е — середина 1950-х гг, in ГУЛАГ. Экономика принудительного труда, eds Бородкин, И., Грегори, П. & Хлевнюк, О.В.. Moscow: Издательство Российская политическая энциклопедия, 17–66. [Sokolov, A.K., 2008. Chapter I. Forced labour in the Soviet economy from the 1930s to the mid 1950s, in GULAG. Economics of forced labour, eds I. Borodkin, P. Gregory & O.V. Khlevnyuk. Moscow: Publishing House Political Encyclopedia, 17–66.]Google ScholarPubMed
Solzhenitsyn, A., 1974. The Gulag Archipelago: An experiment in literary investigation, Vol. I. New York/Evanston/San Francisco/London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Solzhenitsyn, A., 1975. The Gulag Archipelago: An experiment in literary investigation, Vol. II. New York/Evanston/San Francisco/London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Solzhenitsyn, A., 1978. The Gulag Archipelago: An experiment in literary investigation, Vol. III. New York/Evanston/San Francisco/London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Soran, D.M. & Stillman, D.B., 1982. An Analysis of the Alleged Kyshtym Disaster. Los Alamos (NM): Los Alamos National Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturdy Colls, C., 2015. Holocaust Archaeologies: Approaches and future directions. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturdy Colls, C., Kerti, J. & Colls, K., 2020. Tormented Alderney: archaeological investigations of the Nazi labour and concentration camp of Sylt. Antiquity 94, 512–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trabalka, J.R, Eyman, D.L. & Auerbach, S.I., 1979. Analysis of the 1957–58 Soviet Nuclear Accident. Oak Ridge (TN): Oak Ridge National Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapeznikov, A.V., Aarkrog, A., Pozolotina, V.N., et al. , 1994. Radioactive pollution of the Ob river system from Urals Nuclear Enterprise «Majak». Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 25, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapeznikov, A.V., Pozolotina, V., Molchanova, I., et al. , 2000. Radioecological investigation of the Techa-Iset’ river Ssystem. Russian Journal of Ecology 31(4), 224–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uziel, D., 2010. The Holocaust from above: Auschwitz imagery and beyond, in Landscape Through the lLens. Aerial photographs and historic environment, eds Cowley, D.C., Standring, R.A. & Abicht, M.J.. Oxford/Oakville: Oxbow, 267–79.Google Scholar
Whorton, M., 2002. Evaluating and managing Cold War era historic properties: the cultural significance of US Air Force defensive radar systems, in Matériel Culture: The archaeology of twentieth-century conflict, eds Beck, C.M., Johnson, W.G. & Schofield, J.. London: Routledge, 216–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar